THE HILL
 

Revenge of the middle class

By John Feehery - 11/03/09 07:06 PM ET

The elections today should send a simple message to the Obama administration and congressional Democrats: You lost the middle class, and you won’t get them back until you fundamentally change your legislative agenda.

During last year’s campaign, President Barack Obama consistently stressed how his policies were going to help the middle class. He talked about his middle-class tax cut. He promised that any new spending would be paid by the rich. He attacked his opponent, John McCain, continuously for his plan to raise taxes on the middle class. He promised change the middle class could believe in. He was Mr. Middle Class.

John McCain never mentioned the middle class. Not once. Sure, he made fun of Obama’s celebrity (not understanding that the middle class kind of likes celebrity), he talked about the war (not understanding that many in the middle class are tired of war), and he talked about taxes and the free market (when the middle class were growing tired of the free market and weren’t that concerned about their taxes going up).

Obama won the middle class (or at least did better than he should have) in the last election, and that is one of the most important reasons why he won the election.

Now, a year into his presidency, the middle class is turning on the Obama administration, and more importantly, the Democrats in Congress. They don’t particularly love Republicans either, but at least Republicans aren’t being blamed for what has happened over the last 10 months.

The middle class sees the Wall Street bailout, sees Tim Geithner, a former Wall Street wunderkind, orchestrating it, and they get angry.

The middle class sees bailout money going for things like a grant for Syracuse University to study the sex lives of freshman women, or $800,000 for a project to build a backup runway for the John Murtha airport, and they get really angry.

They get angry because they know that they are going to have to pay for it.

They get angry because they know that they are going to have to pay for the new tax on energy consumption, a tax that they know will make life harder on them.

They get angry when they see a healthcare bill that may or may not give healthcare coverage to illegal immigrants, but certainly won’t make their current healthcare premiums go down. And they know that they will have to pay for that, too.

They get angry when they see the president not make a decision on or show leadership on Afghanistan, but rush off at a moment’s notice to Copenhagen to see if he can get his hometown of Chicago the Olympics, only to be humiliated in the process.

They like Obama personally (or at least that is what the polls show), but they are angry that the Democrats seem to care more about the rich and the poor, and less about them.

They see all this big government coming, and they see all this bailout money going, and they don’t think it is right. They think they are going to get screwed, and worse, they think the country is going in the wrong direction.

And today, they are going to vote against the president and the Democrats, and send a message that they hope will get their attention.

If that doesn’t work, they will try again next November.

Visit www.thefeeherytheory.com.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/campaign/66187-revenge-of-the-middle-class

Comments (43)

Judging by the fact that Obama will be watching Chicago Bulls game tonight instead of election returns, the middle class revenge has started.BY Bzdashek on 11/03/2009 at 19:51
My mother used tosay "Be careful what you wish for, you may get it!" Well, Dems, you got it . You were baffled and dazzled by a shiester extrordinaire. You wanted the anti-Bush. You got him. You liked the idea of being "progressive" and voted like knee-jerk liberals, and elected an inexpreienced neophyte who is hell bent on breaking YOUR backs for the benefit of everyone else, even as he jets all over the world, has jazz parties in the White House, plays non-stop golf and B-ball; essentially fiddling while men and women die in Afghanistan and his wife parades in designer duds. You elected a president who wants to make up for every socio-economic injustice HE perceives, in one year. In short, youelected yourself, another narcissistic member of the ME generation, who is more interested in what he sees in the mirror than anything else. So you asked for it, you got. Now get up and do something about it before your singing the national anthem in Russian.BY Reality Check on 11/03/2009 at 19:52
National Debt approx $12 Trillion and counting. Has Congress lost their minds? Gross Negligence. No more incumbents. Select fiscal conservatives in your primaries.BY Farnsworth on 11/03/2009 at 19:58
Wishing does not mean fulfillment. Many are they who look at these elections and hope… This hope however will be smashed, because these elections mean nothing in the national arena. They carry this hope to blogs everywhere assured that those who read them and many other bytes of information will have their minds changed believing they may be on the losing side in 2010. But these people who read are smarter than those worship the words written by conservative bloggers. Get a grip. These elections mean nothing except at the local level.BY Commonsensus on 11/03/2009 at 21:16
do not know what these elections really mean. I do know it is unfortunate for these states that they now have GOP governors, which really means nothing will get done for the people and policies put in to enrich corporations and insurance companies. If they thought they were having a hard time under the Dems, they ain't seen nothing yet? They are up for a very [***]py ride and rude awakening!BY Angellight on 11/04/2009 at 05:53
So a voter goes to the polls to elect a governor and its all about Obama????? BS. The middle class isn't as stupid as Republican pundits would have everyone believe.BY Gil Wilson on 11/04/2009 at 06:10
I know very few middle class people who voted for Obama. they saw thru him but McCann was not the candidate that should have been chosen either.I do hope we are able to rid both sides who are nothing but losers including Obama.BY ania on 11/04/2009 at 06:13
President Obama and the democratic congress had promised change that would help people's lives, such as real healthcare reform, a greener economy, transparency in the government, more people being able to stay in their homes, etc. Even with the tactics of the republican (fascist) party, they should have been able to push this through much more strongly and in a way much more beneficial to Main Street. If people don't experience a real and tangible difference to their lives in terms of jobs, salaries, healthcare, etc, the democrats will continue to lose ground.BY Tovah on 11/04/2009 at 06:26
I hope liberals really think this is "only local".BY Rick H on 11/04/2009 at 07:13
Perhaps these two races for governor in NJ and VA are not about Obama personally. Could it not be, however, that they were about policies that Obama and the two Dem candidates for governor embrace? If folks don't see policies working, they are not likely to support candidates who embrace them. Right now, folks want to work. Unemployment is going up and up. And I think most folks know or believe in their gut that the Obama "jobs saved/created" numbers are distortions of reality if not out-and-out lies.BY QR4J on 11/04/2009 at 07:57

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.