THE HILL
 

Time to hang up the teabags?

By A.B. Stoddard - 11/04/09 06:11 PM ET

Sarah Palin couldn't deliver New York's 23rd district for Republicans with her endorsement of Conservative third-party candidate Doug Hoffman, but candidates across the country are still scared of the power of Palin, Tea Parties and the Club for Growth combined.


The morning after Hoffman went down and a Democrat was elected in NY-23 for the first time since 1870, Rep. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) got to work soliciting an endorsement from Palin for his campaign to win President Barack Obama's old Senate seat next year. According to a memo obtained by The Washington Post, Kirk contacted Fred Malek, a Republican who has taken Palin under his wing, and asked for the nod from the former Alaska governor.

Kirk — aware that the Club for Growth has already indicated they are cool to his candidacy — is braced for the wrath of Tea Partiers and more if he can't secure some conservative cred from someone like Palin early on. The Post reported Kirk noted that Palin will be appearing on "Oprah" on Nov. 16 and that the Chicago media will be sure to ask her whether she opposes Kirk's candidacy. Kirk wrote to Malek that he seeks something "quick and decisive" from Palin and suggested the following: "Voters in Illinois have a key opportunity to take Barack Obama's Senate seat. Congressman Kirk is the lead candidate to do that."

We'll be watching and waiting to see if Palin approves of someone the Club for Growth does not. But what we know now is that despite a win by a Democrat in NY-23, no GOP candidate believes the conservative activists who backed Hoffman are ready to hang up their tea bags.


WHAT ABOUT THE DEMOCRATS CIVIL WAR?
Ask A.B. returns Tuesday, Nov. 10. Please join my weekly video Q&A by sending your questions and comments to This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it . Thank you.


Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/campaign/66395-time-to-hang-up-the-teabags

Comments (13)

The NY23 results can be very confusing, but here are things people need to know. Owens campaigned against the public option on health care. Dede had endorsed a Democrat which means the million dollars spent by the Republican Party was a waste of time and proving there really is no functional two party system. Owens did not win 50 percent of the vote and immediately has to start running for office for 2010. This story is far from over.BY Andrew on 11/04/2009 at 19:26
No, it isn't time to hang up the teabaggers yet. Typically, you don't throw away a teabag until you've squeezed every last drop out of them. I don't believe the GOP is done using them yet, nor is the left done appreciating them yet. If the combined enodor[***]ts of ERic Erickson of RedState, Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Hugh Hewitt, Michael Medved, Laura Ingraham, [***] Armey, Michele Bachmann, Sarah Palin, Rick Santorum, Rep Todd Tiahrt, Steve Forbes, Tim Pawlenty, Jim DeMint, Governor of Texas Rick Perry, Mike Huckabee, Newt Gingrich, as well as others and a host of organizations can't win in a district that has been Republican since 1870, I think the GOP needs to rethink falling victim to the "Kill The R.I.N.O.s" genocide currently being planned by the teabaggers. At any rate, I'm popping my popcorn. See you in 2010…BY Robert Emory on 11/05/2009 at 00:03
@Andrew: What a surprise— another teabagger who is SURE his favorite wingnut radio and tv hosts always tell him the truth! Owens did not campaign against the public option and is, in fact, on record as supporting the public option in the current House bill. http://news.firedoglake.com/2009/10/29/ny-23-owens-endorses-public-option-in-only-televised-debate/ This historic election was a referendum on teabaggers. Even moderates aren't comfortable in the same room with them!BY Melissa on 11/05/2009 at 00:17
Well, that worked for the Republicans even better than McCain/Palin—-Go Rouge!!! Again!!!!!!!!!! Harder!!!!!!!!! !!Harder!!!!!!! !! !!!!!!!!!!!!BY Dale from Midland on 11/05/2009 at 00:27
The narrow margin that Hoffman lost by in the 23rd district tells the bigger story.BY D.P on 11/05/2009 at 07:50
Keep laughing, as a third party candidate in the 23rd District forced a Republican out of the race—not because the party made her leave but because the money dried up and her poll numbers dropped into the toilet. A third party candidate received 44 percent of the vote. When's the last time that happened? If Scozzafava had not been on the ballot, if service men and women had not voted before she pulled out of the race, hard to say how the numbers would have come in. Nothing standard about this race.BY Kathleen on 11/05/2009 at 08:22
Well that does seem to prove the fact, how the Democrats snookered you againBY ian cormac on 11/05/2009 at 10:31
There needs to be a strategy to defeat these "Brownshirt" teabaggers, birthers, tenthers, and astroturfers.. The strategy they are using consists of McCarthyism, the use of the Nazi "Big Lie" and just plain adolescent immaturity. Go To: www.oldamericancentury.org/14pts.html for some insight. Expose them as being fiscally irresponsible by just showing the citizens who are the really big spenders. Go To: www.lafn.org/gvdc/Natl_Debt_Chart.html.BY ghostcommander on 11/05/2009 at 11:56
The N.Y Race was lost because the top echelon of theRepublican party made a stupid mistake in backingthat women who stabbed them in the back.By putting herself behind the Dem.I think it would have been worst if Palin did not get involved.BY J Walsh on 11/05/2009 at 14:17
There were many contributing factors to this race. Hoffman BY Jon on 11/05/2009 at 14:29

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.