Looks like the Democrats are facing a tough night tomorrow; they could lose both gubernatorial elections in New Jersey and Virginia and the special election in New York's 23rd district. While they will be able to credibly explain away each loss, those explanations will drown in the big story of a GOP rout and the foreboding the Democratic Party should feel about next year's midterm elections.
Whatever happens tomorrow in the NY-23 race will be anticlimactic. Now that Dede Scozzafava, the Republican candidate, has dropped out, there has already been a clear and historic victory for the Conservative Party.
The Republican Party is now a third party in NY-23. The Conservative Party of New York was formed in 1962, but is the focus now of national interest. And it cannot be denied that Sarah Palin was the first major national political figure to cross the river to NY-23. The new energy heading to NY-23 is formed out of the Tea Party and Town Hall movements. We can possibly see now the fledgling beginning of a third major party in America, the Conservative Party.
The spin has started. The Democratic pundits and Democratic strategists have begun their march to sophistry with this: Whatever happens in the 2009 elections is really not important.
This is baloney, and even worse, it is very dangerous baloney, because delusion is never a good political strategy, and deception is never a good communications tactic.
If Creigh Deeds, the Democratic nominee for governor of Virginia, loses by a significant margin, it should send Democrats to an ice-cold shower.
With just days to the 2009 election, we can prepare for ourselves an avalanche of media reports, blog posts, tweets, e-mails (OK, you get the idea) of what the results in the New Jersey and Virginia gubernatorial races mean for President Barack Obama and the Democratic Party.
Truth to be told, it won’t mean much no matter what happens. Why, you say? First, with about a year to the 2010 midterm elections and three years to the presidential elections, the results of what happens in Virginia (McDonnell will win, unfortunately), and New Jersey (Corzine will win, fortunately) will be long forgotten. Second, as much as people want to make state races in an off-year about the incumbent president’s popularity or lack thereof, they really come down to state issues (not national ones), and how candidates and campaigns ran against each other. That being said, nothing will stop the avalanche of stories and comments by the political intelligentsia, who will try to extract national meaning from two state races that at best can be described as traditionally blue (New Jersey) and purple (Virginia).
Q: What do you do to relax? How do you stay fit? What are you most proud of? What book are you reading now? What is your favorite sport to watch on TV? What is on your Ipod these days?
Sen. Creigh Deeds (D): I enjoy spending time with my
As a baseball fan, I was excited to hear that they’re bringing minor league baseball back to Richmond. I think that’s a great thing for the community and for everybody in Richmond who loves baseball. I look forward to getting out to cheer on the home team next year.
The Hill's A.B. Stoddard answers a viewer question about congressional term limits and looks at how Tea Party Republicans and other third-party candidates may help Democrats in several upcoming elections.
Why did voters say they voted for the Republican? According to The Washington Post, the reasons varied. One said that he voted for the person, not the party. Another thought that electing a Republican would give more balance to the City Council, and perhaps inspire it to work in a bipartisan way.
Even with a hard shift to the left by President Obama and his Democrat cohorts, Americans remain willing to give the party of FDR more latitude and flexibility to pursue its liberal agenda, pending any massive lurches that throw the entire country off track.
Despite Treasury Secretary Geithner’s best attempts to do just that, public opinion of the administration remains high. Polls out just this week show most Americans don’t blame Obama for the financial mess, alluding to the argument that many are anxious to see how he will get us out of this mess.
In campaigns, one side often calls on the other to return money for one reason or another. Sometimes it's valid, sometimes not. Regardless, it's Campaign 101. But when the contributor in question is the single biggest financial criminal in history, there can be no question that those illicit funds should not remain in campaign coffers.