Campaign

  October 14, 2010, 10:41 am

Delaware debate: A pathological problem on taxes

By Armstrong Williams

CNN's coverage of Delaware's Senate race debate was definitely one to watch as a keen microcosm of the larger issues facing voters this November.

Yes, the candidates, Democrat Chris Coons and Republican/Tea Partier Christine O'Donnell, were a bit quirky at first in their responses. If you watched, you saw both looking stiff, pale and downright canned in their answers.

Read more...
Archived under: Campaign
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  October 13, 2010, 4:58 pm

Going through the campaign motions

By A.B. Stoddard


Archived under: Campaign
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  October 13, 2010, 1:53 pm

Andrew Cuomo — the next purple governor of NY?

By Lanny Davis

So when is the last time you heard a truly progressive Democrat say the following (I am paraphrasing, thus no quotation marks):

I believe we may have reached a critical mass as Democrats: It's time for a freeze on government spending, a freeze on all taxes, and we should seriously look at tax cuts to encourage private-sector job growth. And regarding the Tea Partiers: I share their anger, I share their frustration, and we need to address their concerns about big government and high deficits. Read more...

Archived under: Campaign
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  October 12, 2010, 3:38 pm

So, it is about hate

By David Di Martino

News out of Nevada — according to The Washington Post’s Chris Cillizza — Nevada Tea Party Senate nominee Sharron Angle raised a whopping $14 million over the third fundraising quarter (July 1-Sept. 30). Surely, this is an exceptional fundraising feat — and is likely to stand as the most money raised for a Senate campaign in a quarter for the entire election cycle.

Usually, campaigns rejoice over high fundraising totals. Usually, raising a few million dollars stokes momentum and elicits elation. Usually, campaigns would rally around that accomplishment and drive a positive message about the change they are hoping to bring about. Or they might demonstrate the overwhelming humility that candidates usually feel when showered with such support. Read more...

Archived under: Campaign
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  October 12, 2010, 1:42 pm

Redefining the gender gap this November

By Sabrina L. Schaeffer

We all know 2010 is expected to be the “Year of the Republican Woman.” Usually we’re just referring to the rise in GOP female candidates. But now it appears there’s more: Democrats cannot depend on the female vote in 2010.

According to a recent AP-GfK poll, Democrats hold only a five-point advantage among likely female voters in November — the same edge Democrats had in 1994 when Republicans took back Congress.

Political analysts love to talk about the election gender gap — the notion that women support Democrats disproportionately over Republicans. But as Karlyn Bowman of the American Enterprise Institute has explained, the most important issue that contributes to voting differences between men and women is over the proper role of government. And this is where things have changed.

Read more...
Archived under: Campaign
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  October 12, 2010, 1:15 pm

The attack on Gillespie

By John Feehery

I have known Ed Gillespie for a long time. He is a good guy. He is honest as the day is long. He is a hard worker. He is a smart strategist and he understands policy.

When President Bush called on him to work in the White House, Gillespie left his thriving strategic advocacy firm (Quinn Gillespie, a firm that I will be joining at the end of this month, in full disclosure), at considerable personal expense, to help out the president.

Read more...
Archived under: Campaign
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  October 11, 2010, 3:18 pm

Campaign finance: Does anyone care?

By A.B. Stoddard

You have all, no doubt, heard about all of the money pouring into the 2010 midterm elections. Donations can now be kept secret, and millions are being funneled through “social welfare” nonprofits designated by the tax code as 501(c)(4) groups that the IRS and the Federal Election Commission (FEC) are paying little mind to at this point. Most won't file taxes for the first time until after the election is over with.



It is a whole new money game with profound implications, but we are three weeks away from Election Day and the debate over campaign finance is going nowhere. The White House is picking fights with the Chamber of Commerce over the question of foreign money being used to pay for ads supporting Republican campaigns. The president and his senior adviser, David Axelrod, have raised the question but have provided no evidence that it's happening. Read more... Archived under: Campaign
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  October 11, 2010, 2:16 pm

CBS's Scheiffer: ‘Is that the best you can do?’

By Cheri Jacobus

In what turned out to be the single best moment of yesterday's Sunday morning political chat-fests, CBS's Bob Scheiffer, host of "Face the Nation," asked Obama crony David Axelrod, quite simply, "Is that the best you can do?" The New York Times and other media outlets have plainly said the Democrats are wrong.

Read more...
Archived under: Campaign, Media
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  October 11, 2010, 1:07 pm

Obama is losing it

By John Feehery

If you are an American and you travel anywhere in the world in an official capacity, one of your first meetings is likely to be with the local American Chamber of Commerce.

Meeting with AmChams (as they are called) is an essential way to get a better understanding of how American businesses are doing in selling American products overseas. Members of AmChams (who are usually American) have an acute understanding of the local laws, the obstacles that foreign governments often place in the way of trade and the opportunities that exist for further investment.

Read more...
Archived under: Campaign, The Administration
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  October 11, 2010, 12:47 pm

Is this the change you were promised?

By Armstrong Williams

In three weeks, it is time for America to vote for change.

The Democrats have had their run in Congress for four years now and never have we seen such low approval ratings.

They claimed to offer us a positive difference from an out-of-touch GOP back in 2006, but have proven to be worse. They neither “drained the swamp of corruption” nor listened to the voices of their constituents.

Read more...
Archived under: Campaign
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
« Start< Prev11121314151617181920Next >End »
 

More Videos »

Pundits Blog Twitter - Click to follow
bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire (Energy) »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »

More Healthwatch »

More Floor Action »

More Transportation »

More DEFCON Hill »

More Global Affairs »

More In The Know »

More RegWatch »

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.