THE HILL
 

The Constitution’s dark side

By Armstrong Williams - 10/16/09 09:53 AM ET

The original intent of the Founding Fathers who drafted United States Constitution was to minimize the impact of government tyranny on the people. There was a clear bias toward small government and local governance. Thomas Jefferson was clear that governments that govern the best govern the least. As a result, the Constitution imposed significant constraints on ability of the federal government to govern.

It is difficult to have a strong, principled leader in the U.S because there are so many checks and balances among the three branches of government (legislature, judiciary and executive) and federalist system. In order to pass legislation it takes much compromise, even among members of the same party. It's much easier to govern in a European-style parliamentarian system where these checks and balances do not exist. The parliamentary party in control doesn't have to pass muster with an independent executive who has veto power. Nor a Supreme Court that can over rule the constitutionality of any law. Nor a Constitution that says that all power not explicitly delegated to the federal government belongs to local government or the people.


Because so many levels of government are required for approval of legislation, it's sort of like the old aphorism about decisions made by committee. You try to design a horse and you end up with a camel. It is an unfortunate byproduct of the U.S. system that legislation is complex and often includes provisions that do not pertain to the central core of the legislation (e.g., earmarks) but are required for passage.

People who are decisive leaders find the inability of the government to make decisive decisions frustrating. As a result, people who are decisive leaders tend to go into the private sector and the military, where decisive actions are valued and people are responsible for their decisions. People who go into politics and government tend to respond to the results of polls and power, not principle, analysis and foresight. As a result, they easily abdicate responsibility for the collective decisions made in government. Furthermore, these politicians are willing to compromise their principles and soul if necessary in order to gain and retain power.

This is the dark side of a Constitution that has the intent of minimizing government tyranny on the people.


Williams can be heard nightly on XM Power 169 from 9 to 10 p.m. EST.


Visit www.armstrongwilliams.com .

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/civil-rights/63447-the-constitutions-dark-side

Comments (4)

I doubt our founding fathers would've expected/anticipated the modern creation of "career politicians" either.BY Kathryn on 10/16/2009 at 11:04
It's interesting you take this viewpoint. What is unfortunate is those "decisive leaders" you talk about are completely disregarding Thomas Jefferson's point and are actively working to circumvent the structure of government that is meant to keep it small and only where absolutely necessary.These "restrictions" that are being worked around with earmarks and endless legal babble are doing more damage to our nation than any other situation outside of the general moral apathy we are also experiencing, although the two are directly related in my mind.Had Thomas Jefferson envisioned such shenanigans in his time, I'm sure there would have been verbiage to limit their use. As it is now, we need to install those limits and take care of the mess that is our current federal legal infrastructure.BY Ben on 10/16/2009 at 14:51
Easy answer…TERM LIMITS.BY Marc in NY on 10/16/2009 at 22:39
I do not know how you could have so perverted the Constitution that it gives rise to the conclusions you postulate herein. Earmarks are unavoidable because of the Constitution? There is nothing wrong with the Constitution, the failure exists within the people that have been sworn to uphold it. This current Communist Administration cannot even conduct themselves with the same transparency and integrity of the Russian Parliment! The problem is lobbyists, the greed, and that the systems in place that exacerbate the continuance of this greed has corrupted the system. Making Unconstitutiona lity a Federal Offense that gives both financial and internment punishments, might help. As all our forefathers warned…men without virtue cannot ever live up to the Oath they have been given. People without virtue cannot vote correctly either.BY Savant Noir on 10/17/2009 at 18:29

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.