THE HILL
 

Ron Paul and Sarah Palin: The Ross Perot moment

By Bernie Quigley - 09/17/09 12:35 PM ET

The most startling statistic to come out this month is the latest Washington Post/ABC poll that shows 43 percent of Americans now consider themselves to be independents.

Much of the celebrity thrill seems to be gone, as Wall Street Journal commentator Fouad Ajami said it would, with the hip new president who gives such charming speeches. Could be that hip is not what you want in a president when the only difference between Cheney’s war in Iraq and Obama’s war in Afghanistan and Bush’s missile defense program and Obama’s is the better cut of the new commander in chief’s suit. On the two main fronts, the economy and the war, majorities oppose, and he has even lost 10 percent of the young'uns since July. Twenty-two-year-olds consider themselves to be immortal. They don’t want health insurance.



Change is about, without question, but Obama himself may only be the harbinger, not the change. We could be approaching not a Kennedy or a Roosevelt or a Lincoln moment, but a Ross Perot moment.

Ross Perot came out of nowhere back in the early 1990s and with a kooky Texas freshness, a crateful of his own cash and a bunch of charts, he took almost 20 percent of the vote in 1992. At one point in the summer he commanded a lead with 39 percent. What the Perot moment indicated was that World War II or Elvis or the Beach Boys or something had freed Americans from their old constraints. But Ronald Reagan really turned the sea. Prior to Reagan you could with accuracy count on good Boston Irish going to the Catholic Church and voting Democrat every time. You could count on New York Jews and Southern Baptists to do the same. But when Reagan took 49 states in 1984, it was all over with that. Americans were free. With 43 percent claiming to be independent today, they apparently still are free.

This week Arianna Huffington, the liberal doyenne, and Ron Paul both appeared on "Morning Joe." They seemed to like each other and to be in increasing agreement on economic issues. But what was striking was the new legitimacy that Rep. Paul (Texas) has gained since Obama’s bailouts have taken hold. Given the high disapproval ratings on both the economy and the war, it could be said today that the country is moving to Paul’s positions by osmosis. Paul opposed the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. He opposed the bailouts. He opposed the entire Keynesian perspective that the Obama administration has adopted lock, stock and barrel. Morning Joe — no radical libertarian — pulled out an old script to read in amazement how the housing crisis had played out exactly as Paul said it would back in 2003. Paul advocates Austrian economics, and as he gathers continuing respect, Austrian economics gains a new authenticity as well.

Sarah Palin and Ron Paul bear kinship. Those who like Paul very often also like Palin. She has said she admired Paul’s independent streak and Paul, like Palin, was considered a pariah when America’s support for Obama was in the 70s and all three networks were head over heels for Obamanomics. But as the sweet and authentic Mary Travis of Peter, Paul and Mary unfortunately passed away this week, I was remembering how the charmed old labor songs that the Weavers used to sing took flight when I was a teenager. Bob Dylan was the pariah then; now he’s everywhere — selling Pepsi and women’s underwear on TV during football games, playing bar mitzvahs. You can’t get rid of the guy.

Such an awakening is ahead again, perhaps, as the old ideas inevitably yield to time. But different times yield to different ideas.

There are maybe subtle hints that the networks seem to be catching on. Charles Gibson, the ABC News anchor, who led the major networks in their idolatrous backing of Obama, is retiring this year. He will be replaced by Diane Sawyer. Comment was that they wanted a woman for the job. But there are certainly lots of other women who could do it. Sawyer goes way back, to Nixon, to Kissinger, to the Time of Tall Men. My instinct was they were making a correction, ditching the lightweights and getting their best people up front for what lies just ahead.


Visit Mr. Quigley's website at http://quigleyblog.blogspot.com.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/economy-a-budget/59257-ron-paul-and-sarah-palin-the-ross-perot-moment

Comments (137)

I have always known that Sarah Palin, deep down in her heart, is a libertarian after having read about her term as governor of Alaska, plus her many speeches and interviews.She said, after her resignation: "politically speaking, if I die, I die. So be it." That is the most trenchant way any politician has ever said regarding the pervasive contempt of the people for the whole corrupt and extremely partisan political process in our country.What a great woman.BY thomas j young on 09/17/2009 at 14:54
"Those who like Paul very often also like Palin."You lie. Good article until that point.BY Nick on 09/17/2009 at 15:04
Sarah Palin and Ron Paul go together like popcorn and the opera. Sarah Palin is a product of the neocon Bill Kristol. Ron Paul is the anti-neocon. It's weird to link together people from completely different ideologys.Sarah Palin Booo!Ron Paul Yeah!BY Jon on 09/17/2009 at 15:11
Yeah I agree with Nick 100% unless by "like" you mean some type of affection based on the person. There is a night vs. day difference between Palin and Paul; the one which stands out most starkly to me is of course their opposite views about having American troops making eternal war on "terrorists". Sarah Palin takes that pathetic model for granted, vs. Ron Paul who wants no part of it.BY Chris on 09/17/2009 at 15:23
I'm going to second Nick's comment. Those who are libertarians and have supported Paul the most DO NOT support/like Palin because she uses neo-conservative rhetoric. She believes in State involvement (government involvement) in civil liberty cases. She also happens to wants more government involvement in Foreign affairs like the war in Iraq. I'm sorry Bernie but you're flat out misinformed about who we "Paulites" are.BY Travis on 09/17/2009 at 15:40
Nick 100% right on.I highly doubt anyone who likes or admires Sarah Palin has the intelligence or intestinal fortitude to understand let alone support Ron Paul.They go together like popcorn and opera, classic…BY detroitjoe on 09/17/2009 at 15:49
I don't really see what Paul and Palin have in common. Paul holds reasoned and consistent beliefs and is well-read on the topics that should matter in politics (economics, the Constitution, etc). Palin is basically the stereotype of a vacuous politician that just regurgitates what she thinks the voters want to hear.BY Cytoarchitecture on 09/17/2009 at 15:52
Palin may have been much less evil and corrupt than McCain but she is no Ron Paul. The significant difference is of course her embrace of neocon foreign policy.BY Michael on 09/17/2009 at 15:52
Ron Paul = Real Deal. Palin = wuddacuddashudd a.BY Elvis on 09/17/2009 at 15:53
Yeah you did mess that up. People that like Paul like Palin. You are just about as smart and crazy as Palin.BY KYLE IN WI on 09/17/2009 at 15:59

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.