THE HILL
 

States must prohibit taxation of children

By Bernie Quigley - 11/23/09 10:52 AM ET

Once we might have called upon Congress when reason and responsibility demanded initiative. But the feckless Pelosi and Reid have expressed such vast irresponsibility in their short tenure that we must look now to the legislative bodies of last resort: The states. First item: The states should prohibit the taxation of children.

Centuries ago, as we rose to self-governance, a division occurred between feudal countries, which placed economic burdens on children by demanding that they pay the debts of their parents or grandparents. In free countries, a child is born free of such onerous debt. It is the hallmark of a free country. But it is no longer the hallmark of our country.

Douglas Holtz-Eakin, former director of the Congressional Budget Office, recently testified before Congress that our fiscal situation has deteriorated rapidly in just the past few years. The federal government ran a 2009 deficit of $1.4 trillion — the highest since World War II — as spending reached nearly 25 percent of GDP and total revenues fell below 15 percent of GDP. Shortfalls like these have not been seen in more than 50 years.
Going forward, he wrote in The Wall Street Journal, there is no relief in sight, as spending far outpaces revenues and the federal budget is projected to be in enormous deficit every year. Our national debt is projected to stand at $17.1 trillion 10 years from now, or over $50,000 per American.

“The planned deficits will have destructive consequences for both fairness and economic growth,” he writes. “They will force upon our children and grandchildren the bill for our overconsumption.

But it’s not going to happen. In czarist Russia, perhaps. Or Cromwell’s Ireland. But not here.

Visit Mr. Quigley's website at http://quigleyblog.blogspot.com.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/economy-a-budget/69103-states-must-prohibit-taxation-of-children

Comments (3)

Bush's 2009 Budget is going to tax kids?Wow and his Borrow and spend for the previous 8 years didn't? I'm surprised; NOT.BY Donaldd on 11/23/2009 at 12:01
Bernie, I don't think they really care, as long as they appear to care. Donaldd, who had the power of the purse last year and I seem to recall a few additional spending measures earlier this year, after a certain pres. took office. Tsk TskBY Winfield on 11/23/2009 at 13:02
Exactly Winfield! Folks conveniently forget that there was a Democrat controlled Congress since 2006.BY Kathryn on 11/23/2009 at 16:23

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.