A bipartisan consensus against 'big pharma' is growing in Congress
© Getty Images

When President Trump, then candidate Trump, first fired a volley of insults and criticism at the pharmaceutical drug industry over their high drug prices, and pledged to use government to get a better deal, the reaction among the establishments of both parties was roughly comparable to that of the pope after reading the 95 Theses.

Unfortunately, if recent rumors about the president’s drug policy are any guide, Trump the president seems to have lost the courage of Trump the candidate on this issue. This is saddening, because the rest of Washington seems to have come candidate Trump’s way. The ground in Congress has unmistakably shifted on the question of drug pricing. With that shift has come some much-needed skepticism of the previously almost bulletproof pharmaceutical industry’s influence over debates on drug policy – skepticism which is slowly but surely making its way into not just op-eds and policy studies, but into actual legislation.

The most recent example of this is the bill that was just introduced by Reps. Gregg Harper (R-Miss.) and Peter WelchPeter Francis WelchOvernight Health Care — Sponsored by PCMA — Trump hits federally funded clinics with new abortion restrictions Dems press Trump officials to reduce price of opioid reversal drug Green activists up the pressure on automobile efficiency standards MORE (D-V.T.) designed to close the so-called “orphan drug loophole” connected to the 340B drug-pricing program. “Orphan drugs” refer to a category of drug supposedly targeted at such a niche market (sufferers of a rare disease) that they could not be profitable without extra government incentives.

PhRMA, the powerful interest group representing brand name drug makers, cut a deal with the Obama White House to prevent rural hospitals from fully benefitting from this much needed drug discount program. Big Pharma had threatened to pull their ads in support of the Affordable Care Act unless they got their way and the Obama administration caved. As a result, brand name drug makers can skirt the requirement that they sell drugs at more affordable prices to safety net hospitals, in exchange for access to the Medicaid and Medicare Part B drug market.

 

Obviously, the problem with a carve out like this is that it creates a perverse incentive to misclassify certain drugs as “orphan” drugs, regardless of their profitability or the size of the market they serve. Not that Pharma needed the encouragement, since orphan drug classification has already ballooned far beyond the categories of drugs it was intended to cover, with pharmaceutical companies attempting to spin even profitable drugs as “orphans” due to specific niche uses for those drugs, a practice called “salami slicing.”

This monopolistic, anti-market practice obviously hurts all consumers, but it particularly hurts the vulnerable people who rely on the often underfunded, understaffed hospitals that the 340B law is designed to help. The fact that both Republicans and Democrats are willing to consider enforcing the program more strictly is, therefore, a positive sign both for consumers and for those concerned about anti-market practices.

But while this is the most recent such bill, it is far from the only one. Earlier this year, the Senate narrowly voted down a bill that would’ve permitted drug importation from Canada: a bill that somehow managed the incredible feat of getting both Sen. Bernie SandersBernard (Bernie) SandersSunday shows preview: Lawmakers weigh in after Texas school shooting Voters Dems need aren't impressed by anti-waterboarding showboating Primary win gives resurgent left a new shot of adrenaline MORE (I-V.T.) and Sen. Ted CruzRafael (Ted) Edward CruzTen dead after shooting at Texas high school Hillicon Valley: Lawmakers target Chinese tech giants | Dems move to save top cyber post | Trump gets a new CIA chief | Ryan delays election security briefing | Twitter CEO meets lawmakers For cable commentators, the 2016 GOP primary never ended MORE (R-Texas) to support it, while losing centrist, pharma-backed Democrats like Corey Booker.

Further, the bipartisan Creating and Restoring Equal Access to Equivalent Samples (CREATES) Act, which permits generic manufacturers to more effectively hold brand name companies engaging in anticompetitive behavior to account, comes with the support of everyone from veteran liberal Sen. Patrick LeahyPatrick Joseph LeahyDem senator mocks Pruitt over alleged security threats: 'Nobody even knows who you are' Pruitt tells senators: ‘I share your concerns about some of these decisions’ Protesters hold up 'fire him' signs behind Pruitt during hearing MORE (D-V.T.) to right-wing Sens. Mike LeeMichael (Mike) Shumway LeeSenate panel advances Trump's CIA nominee Doug Jones to oppose Haspel as CIA chief This week: Trump heads to Capitol Hill MORE (R-Utah) and Charles GrassleyCharles (Chuck) Ernest GrassleyHow House Republicans scrambled the Russia probe Dem lawmaker spars with own party over prison reform Overnight Energy: Pruitt taps man behind 'lock her up' chant for EPA office | Watchdog to review EPA email policies | Three Republicans join climate caucus MORE (R-Iowa).

Now, one could argue that the support of progressive Democrats for anti-pharma causes is to be expected, due to the pervasive anti-corporate attitudes of those same figures. But what is less predictable, and thus more encouraging, is the character of the Republicans joining them. Sens. Mike Lee (R Utah), Chuck GrassleyCharles (Chuck) Ernest GrassleyHow House Republicans scrambled the Russia probe Dem lawmaker spars with own party over prison reform Overnight Energy: Pruitt taps man behind 'lock her up' chant for EPA office | Watchdog to review EPA email policies | Three Republicans join climate caucus MORE (R-Iowa), and especially Cruz form the absolute right flank of the Senate Republican caucus. Similarly, Rep. Gregg Harper (R-Miss.), co-author of the orphan drug loophole-closing bill, has racked up a 96 percent rating from the American Conservative Union for his voting record. Further, Harper votes with President Trump’s position 100 percent of the time in Congress, according to FiveThirtyEight.

Not only is this good for the Republican party, since such zealous members of the party frequently have outsized power to define its agenda, but it represents the depth of the sea change over drug prices that has taken place in Washington. When crunchy socialists and right-wing fire-breathers are uniting in favor of the very policies that the pharmaceutical industry fears will take away its gravy train, it’s time to consider that a political earthquake may be taking place.

Mytheos Holt (@MytheosHolt) is a senior fellow at the Institute for Liberty. He previously worked as a speechwriter for Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), and as a writer for publications including The Federalist.


The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the views of The Hill.