THE HILL
 

Obama’s health insurance tax: Coming soon to all policies

By Dick Morris - 09/24/09 08:58 AM ET

By Dick Morris and Eileen McGann

The Baucus healthcare bill provides for a tax on “gold-plated” health insurance policies. But, as with the Alternative Minimum Tax, once slated to be imposed only on the wealthy, inflation will make most Americans liable to pay the 40 percent tax in a few years.

The tax applies to all individual policies with premiums above $8,750 and families of four whose premiums exceed $23,000. But the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the average health insurance premium for families of four will reach $25,000 by 2018. The average premium should pass the thresholds in Baucus’s bill by 2016.



So, a few years after the bill takes effect in 2013, the health insurance premium tax will become virtually universal. And this tax is to be a 40 percent levy. So, in six years, the average family health insurance policy, now projected to cost $25,000, will, in fact, cost $35,000 due to the Obama-Baucus tax!

The Baucus bill tax threshold is, of course, not indexed for medical inflation or even for regular inflation. (Premiums have been rising at 10 percent for a decade and the average family premium now is 109 percent higher than it was 10 years ago.)

Will Congress act, in the future, to index the health insurance premium tax so it does not reach down to the average American’s policies? Not very likely. As costs rise under ObamaCare (as they have in Massachusetts, where they have more than doubled in two years), the pressure for increased revenue will dictate that Congress let the tax grow and expand its reach until it is a universal tax that pays for universal care.

Until now, the Obama plan has not meant much for the average American who now has insurance. While scarcity of doctors and medical care is a likely result, the harm was largely confined to the elderly, who will bear the brunt of the rationing. But now, the Baucus bill shows that the real story is quite different. In a few years’ time, most families will find their health insurance premiums 40 percent higher because of the new tax. Far from cutting the cost of health insurance, the bill will send it through the roof!

To fight this bill, please go to dickmorris.com and click on the link to donate funds to run ads in key swing states (like Maine) to stop this iniquitous piece of legislation.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/healthcare/60149-obamas-health-insurance-tax-coming-soon-to-all-policies

Comments (13)

There are to many loopholes an faults with this reform bill i say tort reform an buying across state lines.BY ANN on 09/24/2009 at 10:29
This is just a great example of Democrats at their best. While proclaiming they are going to give you better health care, they secretly plan to raise your taxes and ration your health care. Calling the Democratic leadership scum would be doing them a favor. What they are doing here is taking dog squeeze and covering it with whipped cream and strawberries and when you complain about the taste they put more whipped cream on it, and if you complain about it then they get their friends in the media to throw out terms like AstroTurf and Teabaggers.BY Robert Rosencrans on 09/24/2009 at 10:42
Good grief. Is this the best Congress can do? Are Americans stuck with choosing the lesser of two evils; Obamacare vs Baucus' bill? I'm very disappointed, indeed.BY Kathryn on 09/24/2009 at 10:47
me thinks if we are not careful there will be only 2 classes the very rich an the very poor.BY ANN on 09/24/2009 at 11:01
If people are going to believe your whopper that costs in Massachusetts have doubled in two years, why not say that they have tripled or quadrupled? Maybe they'll believe that, too.BY Richard Robert on 09/24/2009 at 13:57
Health care costs in Massachusetts have increased significantly and continue to climb. Whether they doubled or not the cost is busting the state budget. Read all about it. http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/03/26/healthcare_cost_increases_dominate_mass_budget_debate/?page=2 Kirwan said the state expects to spend substantially more for insurance subsidies than the $869 million Governor Deval Patrick proposed in his 2009 budget just two months ago, because of increasing enrollment and higher payments to insurers. In private briefings, she has told coalition members that the cost could be $100 million more, according to several who were present. The administration declined to confirm that number.The gap is part of an estimated $1.3 billion shortfall in the $28 billion state budget. A recession could also bring layoffs at private companies that increase the ranks of the uninsured.The subsidized program, called Commonwealth Care, accounts this year for about one-third of the $1.9 billion price tag for healthcare reform. About half of that total is picked up by the federal government.BY Robert Rosencrans on 09/24/2009 at 14:11
Look at the history every program put out there was estimated low to get the people for the program and then as years go by the costs went out of sight. Any thing this administration will do is a big fat lie! They can never give the true costs because it would be rejected by the people! Power is what they want and they only want two classes of people rich and poor it is easier to control poor people! That is why Obama doe not care for the unemployed the more the better for him!BY William on 09/24/2009 at 15:18
I want to see healthcare problems solved, but having folks just give opinions, some are excellent and may be the perfect answer; others are not so good. As long as those of us who want good healthcare dont have a unified voice, then (you know)There MUST take place some kind of meeting of the minds so that people can put their 2 cents in. Congress is not able nor equipped to provide expertise in healthcare, why should they be? But Mr. So and Sew used to be a doctor! why is he now a congressman? Just because someone got the medical diplomas and signatures needed to be an M.D. does not guarantee that person knows everything about everything, doctors are people who make mistakes, some doctors are democrat (proving medical knowledge and common sense are not related).Here is common sense, if the gov't is to take part in healthcare, then let it be for managing the medical facility ie the lights, the utilities, the maintenance, have govt workers build and maintain complex MRI machines so that the doctors themselves and the staff only do their doctorification on people without worry of the overhead cost of the facility/building.Then if I wanted to, I could go in and say I want an appointment for an MRI scan on my knee. no waiting? okay then I go in there and turn on the MRI machine, it scans my knee, it makes a dvd disc and I take it and leave. People self medicate. Give people the recognition that people want to be healed and seek to find the problem and fix it.Our insurance system now is not setup to find the problem and fix it; its setup to generate revenue for the insurance companies and doctors. The insruance company becomes the doctor ad-litem and what treatment you get? is based on an equationCode number PD01234 is small cut on the finger, cost to fix is $5.00; code PD84450 is a digital laceration cost to fix is $120.00 both are the same exact thing described differently. insurance systems seek to treat your finger cut as a code PD84450BY BradAllen on 09/24/2009 at 18:05
And the democrat estimate for the actual and complete cost of this ever-changing healthcare scheme which is too important to properly debate is … ?Would any competent accountant care to reveal the promised and actual costs of each and every major government program which has been implemented up to today's date?BY Davole on 09/25/2009 at 09:59
Well, it seems that with the Democrats every plan comes with the need to unfairly punish someone. It's becoming more and more clear that class envy is driving the train here.BY Glennisq on 09/25/2009 at 10:52

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.