THE HILL
 

How much ObamaCare costs the average family

By Dick Morris - 10/16/09 01:28 PM ET

By Dick Morris and Eileen McGann

Whether or not you now have health insurance, Obama’s healthcare bill will cost you dearly. If you don’t have insurance, you will be required to buy it. The legislation specifies how much you will have to pay for the coverage before any subsidy kicks in. All during the campaign, Obama kept speaking about affordable coverage. Now it appears that his definition of “affordable” might be a bit elastic. 


* If your household income is $66,000 a year, slightly above the national average, Obama’s healthcare bill will require you to spend 12 percent of your income — about $8,000 a year or almost $700 a month — to buy health insurance before you get any federal subsidy. * Even those making less will have to reach deep into their meager resources to satisfy Obama’s statutory requirement. Families scraping by on only $44,0000 a year will have to pay 7 percent of their income (about $3,000) on insurance.

* Even those making just $33,000 will have to ante up 4.5 percent of their income (about $1500) for health insurance.

* The required payments reach so far down the scale that those who are living at the federal poverty level of $22,000 will have to shell out 2 percent of their totally inadequate incomes ($440) for insurance. That Obama is charging premiums to those living at or on the border of poverty is absolutely incredible! And this from a candidate who pledged that he would not tax the middle class! If you have insurance, you will get hit by his proposed 40 percent tax on insurance premiums.

• When the tax — and the legislation — takes effect in 2013, all families making about $120,000 or more in combined household income (14 percent of all families or one in seven) will have to pay the tax. 

• By the next year, 2014, the tax will hit every family making more than $100,000 (about 18 percent of all families or one in six)

• By 2019, 10 years hence, the tax will reach down to effect every family making more than $75,000 a year (31 percent of families or one in three).

The tax will take 40 percent of all premiums above $21,000.

So if you don’t have insurance, you will be socked with a mandate to buy coverage and pay a hefty proportion of your income to do it and if you have insurance, you will be hit with an excise tax on the coverage.

(In theory, it is the insurance companies that have to pay the tax, but the Senate Finance Committee “assumes” that they will pass the tax along to their policyholders.)

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/healthcare/63499-how-much-obamacare-costs-the-average-family

Comments (20)

Does anyone know where one can obtain Bend Over Insurance?BY Robert Rosencrans on 10/16/2009 at 17:32
To those who voted for Obama: Is this the "Hope and Change" that you expected?To those who voted for McCain: Is this the "Rope and Chains" that you expected?BY Mark Gooch on 10/17/2009 at 05:50
More of the same policies of reaching into our pockets to pay for there goverment hand outs to lobbist and friends. They want us dependent not independent so they can obtain ultimate power.BY D.P on 10/17/2009 at 10:57
Morris, why does it sound like so much B*lls*it when you act so concerned for the poor folks who are at the poverty level?You could care less! You are just a shill for the Republican party, always echoing the latest talking points. If they gave free medical care to the poor, you would be talking about the welfare state. By requiring at least some "skin in the game" this balances responsibility with compassion.BY Smilinjack on 10/17/2009 at 17:02
[***] Morris is still holding a grudge against Bill Clinton and I guess he will for the rest of his life. This guy will do and say anything to trash dems and seems to forget that he used to be one of us - makes it obvious that his politics change with his pockets.BY andreams on 10/17/2009 at 18:07
SMILINJACK. I fail to see where you offered any concrete proofs to invalidate the 'talking points" of the author, except to only offer your own talking points that merely reflect your beliefs of what you deem 'right'. All obfuscations and rhetoric aside, no one objects to those 5 million people that cannot get insurance, to have existing programs expanded that will enable them. Simple, that problem is resolved without it ever being some mandated imposition upon my freedoms or freedom of choice. On a nationwide basis, if another objective is to lower costs, then make insurance portable across state lines so "choice" stimulates competition. Want to lower the costs another 10-15%? Do what NO politician would ever do (because they are so friggin corrupt)…and insititute tort reform. They will never do it because they are corrupt, the Lawyer Lobbyists give them 10's of millions of dollars, so they are not going to do "right" by the people when it comes to their own pocketbook. Thats a fact. Now, given that FACT, why would you want to give that kind of corruption a BIGGER hand to stick down your pockets?BY Savant Noir on 10/17/2009 at 18:15
SMILINJACK,Let's see how much smilin' will be goin' on when the government taxes you at their whim. Healthcare needs reform, not a takeover by the government. We need tort reform and insurance purchased over state lines. More competition. By the way, we do give free healthcare to the poor. It's called medicaid.BY Kathi on 10/18/2009 at 01:14
Why are they in so much of hurry? Why don't they take there time and do it right! The programs does not start until 2013! What we are going to get is health rationing at a cost that is going to be trillions I say again trillions more that what they are estimating. Not one government program has been estimated correctly and the costs are usually 10 times what they say it will be. Lets crawl before running and do it the right way and include tort reform which will bring down costs.BY William on 10/18/2009 at 01:33
@RR, the "Bend Over Insurance" policies would be available only to male voters in Nancy Pelosi's district in San Francisco. The rest of us would simply have to insist that any candidate for President in 2012 would nullify Obama's health care overhaul by executive order on Jan 20th, 2013.BY Bzdashek on 10/18/2009 at 02:23
Please stop referring to the healthcare reform plans as being "Obamacare". Believe me, liberal dems wish it was that instead of the hands off tactic he's using. By the way, since it seems to be exciting to point out the cost, why don't they point out, in dollars, what the cost would be without reform? And what about all the elected officials at the local state and federal levels who are receiving free healthcare until they die? What's that figure?BY andreams on 10/18/2009 at 11:07

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.