THE HILL
 

Medicare revisited

By John Feehery - 10/26/09 12:40 PM ET

Medicare is a great program for senior citizens. It is a very popular government-run entitlement. Many old people rely on it for their healthcare. It now includes a prescription drug benefit, which also has proven to be popular.

It is so popular that many Democrats have said they want to extend Medicare for all. If it is so popular for old people, why wouldn’t it work for young people, the theory goes.

The problem with that theory is that Medicare is not all that it is cracked up to be.

First, it is going broke. Earlier this year, the Obama administration said that the Medicare Trust Fund would be going broke by 2017. Coupled with the strains associated with Social Security Trust Fund, which is also going broke, the simple fact of the matter is that we can’t afford to add additional costs to a government that can’t pay its bills now.

Second, it is rife with corruption. According to most estimates, Medicare loses about $60 billion through waste, fraud and abuse every year. For some reason, it is easier and more fun to rip off a government program than it is to rip off a private insurance plan. God knows that people like to rip off insurance companies too, but it is more fun and easier to rip off the government.

Third, reimbursement rates are so low with Medicare that most really good doctors either don’t take Medicare patients or, if they do, they make their patients take all kinds of unnecessary tests so they can make up the difference. Reimbursement rates are already too low. They don’t reflect the realities of the marketplace or the high costs of frivolous medical lawsuits. Some believe that by having Medicare for all, we can somehow control costs. That is nonsense. More government involvement in setting prices will either have a dramatic impact on private-sector costs or (more likely) have a dramatic impact on the overall healthcare quality that we enjoy in this country.

If we want to really have a discussion about fixing healthcare in this country, we should discuss fixing Medicare so that it doesn’t go broke, doesn’t waste billions of dollars every month and doesn’t screw doctors out of their proper reimbursements.

Medicare is very popular for older Americans. On that, there is little disagreement. But what is great for seniors is not necessarily great for the long-term fiscal health of this country.

We should fix Medicare before we even think of expanding it.

Visit www.thefeeherytheory.com.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/healthcare/64759-medicare-revisited

Comments (3)

Bush tried to privatize Medicare and partially succeeded with Medicare Advantage of which he succeeded to place a faster drain on Medicare Funds. That 10-11 Billion a year operating cost over regular Medicare has shortened it's potential life expectancy. Bush use of the Medicare Trust Fund for his war efforts didn't help matters any either.BY Donaldd on 10/26/2009 at 14:49
Bush financed Part D, Medicare by borrowing even more money from the Chinese and adding it to our deficit. To make matters worse he allowed the Drug Companies to write the legislation. My favorite provision is the one that forbids the Government from using its purchasing power to negotiate drug prices with Pharmaceutical Companies just as the VA does. As far as corruption and fraud is concerned with Medicare check with Rick Scott and Humana about their unprecedented fines for fraudulent claims. Looks like the fraud perps are the Insurance companies, doctors, and hospitals. What does it say about their ethics and integrity. When does the greed stop???BY kildeer on 10/26/2009 at 23:04
"Don't screw the doctors out of their proper reimbur[***]ts"? Forget you, Feehery. You've got it all turned around. The Docs, Hospitals, and Drugco's have been screwing us for 20 years with double digit price increases. The U.S. spends 17% of it's GNP on healthcare, the highest of any nation. Europe spends just ½ that much! Rick Scott now runs that "Patriotic Resistance" LIEsite, and was fined 1.3 BILLION while CEO at Columbia Health Care, and should be behind bars. The public option will force lower reimbur[***]t rates, and will pay for insuring the deserving (NOT ILLEGALS) so that their unpaid claims don't force them to bankruptcy. The Tea Partiers have been fed Bushchit by the RNC. Check the 26 lies here: http://www.factcheck.org/2009/08/twenty-six-lies-about-hr-3200/BY flyfshr1cd on 10/27/2009 at 17:56

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.