Homeland Security

Terrorism Will Never Be Extinct

The American government needs to stop celebrating the arraignments of four men over the weekend, believing it helped foil a terrorist plot.Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani said it best: “Today’s arrests remind us that we’re at war … But the reality is that today’s arrests remind me of the fact that we have to stay on offense against terrorists.” That is exactly what both Americans and the American government need to remember.

Unfortunately, it happened almost six years ago, and it can easily happen again. No matter how many plots we halt, there is never a guarantee that terrorism, terrorists or mindless idiots will be eliminated from our society.
Read More...

This is frightening

With past threats of infectious diseases having plagued the world and scared us several times over, it is not only shocking but reprehensible to hear of the 31-year-old lawyer Andrew Speaker, infected with TB, who decided to disobey orders from U.S officials and jeopardize the lives of everyone who may have been anywhere near him.

In a time where bioterrorism creates such a stir within the American public, Speaker should have used the opportunity to cooperate with the CDC and accept their warnings as a blessing to prevent any further spread of the disease.

And with constant scandals and governmental corruption, we now have a Border Patrol officer who saw the flagged passport and still allowed Speaker to cross the border. Forget the fact that Speaker felt he had no reason to obey the law. What about the officer whose job it is to make sure the laws are implemented and respected? This story screams irresponsibility, irrationality and sheer disgust.
Read More...

Why the Media Minimizes the Fort Dix Terror Plot

The mainstream media insist on minimizing terror threats that our intelligence operatives quash before they can wreak mayhem and kill our people. They did it with the Sears Tower raid, the jets that were going to be destroyed over the Atlantic, the millenium attack on LAX airport, the shoe bomber, the Brooklyn Bridge attack, and Padilla the would-be dirty bomber.  In each case, the media is fond of writing how the gang could never have gotten it together to pull off the raid. They portray the attackers as clowns who were disorganized and just dabblers in terror whose case is being hyped by the right wing to stoke terror fears.

But these characterizations of real threats we faced and, thanks to our homeland security forces, thwarted are quite wrong and distorted. Had these liberal critics interviewed Mohammed Atta and his gang of 9/11 hijackers, they might have come to the same conclusion.
Read More...

George Tenet: Bush’s First Mistake

After watching George Tenet being interviewed by Scott Pelley last night on “60 Minutes,” one thing became clear to me: President Bush should have put his own guy at the CIA at the beginning of his first term.

Tenet seems like he was passionate about his job. He truly wanted to protect the nation from terrorism. Of that, I have no doubt. But let’s face it. He was Clinton’s guy, and he presided over the destruction of the CIA as a fully functioning intelligence agency while he served President Clinton. He should not have stayed on with President Bush, if for no other reason than he was the choice of the president who had the lowest regard for the intelligence community in our nation’s history.
Read More...

Rudy Draws Blood in Hit on Terror

Rudy Giuliani has raised the first cross-party issue of the 2008 election by saying that if the Democrats win, America would be forced to take the defensive in the war on terror. Clinton and Obama quickly jumped on the attack and replied that that was hitting below the belt. Point to Rudy. The Democrats, for all their strength over Iraq, are vulnerable on every other
aspect of the terror issue. Their reluctance to approve the Patriot Act, their opposition to aggressive interrogation of terror suspects, and their horror at invasions of e-mail and telephone privacy all cast them as weaker than Giuliani or the GOP in the war on terror.

Rudy's attack is a great way to defend the war in Iraq — by saying, in effect, that the best defense is a good offense. If we do not have the terrorists back on their heels, dodging from cave to cave in Afghanistan and street to street in Baghdad, they will hit us here, at home. Rudy is on the right track in making this his issue.
Read More...

Pages