The report of the working group advising President Obama about the future of NSA eavesdropping, along with the latest decision of a federal court that finds much of the NSA spying unconstitutional, inspires one conclusion: There should be a cutback in the overall level of NSA spying.
Retired Army colonel and historian-scholar at Boston University Andrew Bacevich has an intriguing take on the current conversation about secrecy.
“Thanks to a couple of tech-savvy malcontents, anyone with access to the Internet now knows what only insiders were supposed to know," he wrote in a book review in The Washington Post recently.
Because the public doesn’t know what insiders know, we can’t know whether Bradley Manning or Edward Snowden are patriotic whistle-blowers or treasonous leakers. I speculate neither description accurately characterizes their behavior.
Is the now-notorious, massive leak of National Security Agency classified information by Edward Snowden an act of valuable civil disobedience for which the American public should be grateful?
No less than the co-founder of Apple, Steve Wozniak, expressed distress to learn that the technology he helped develop was being used by the government (the National Security Agency) to invade people’s privacy. For bringing this to public attention, he considers Snowden a hero, he told The Daily Beast.
Or is Snowden’s action a hit-and-run act by an irresponsible fugitive, a traitor, and an attention seeker at that who appropriately was indicted and is being hunted down as he traverses the world, now a veritable man without a country?
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper is in the extra-hot seat at the moment, what with the shocking news of the government dragnetting our phone calls and emails and Skype sessions, etc.
Calls for the President to deep-six the 72-year-old retired military officer are mounting. Clapper has not done well in trying to explain his apparent lie under oath at a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing last March. The exchange with Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore) went like this:
Wyden: “Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?”
Clapper: “No sir ... not wittingly.”
His subsequent justification of the answer, in an interview last Sunday with NBC’s Andrea Mitchell, only made things worse:
It is ironic that when American civil liberties are under attack, the mechanism employed would be called a "patriot" act. It is equally ironic that when the final legacy of President Obama is written, it will include his championing of a surveillance state of a kind that that his predecessor, President George W. Bush, established over the objection at that time of Barack Obama.
Recently, Wall Street Journaleditorial board member Dorothy Rabinowitz referred to the government of New York City as “totalitarian.” Obama apologist Paul Krugman said on ABC of the federal government this week: "We Are kind of an 'authoritarian surveillance state."
Glenn Greenwald, a reporter for the British newspaper The Guardian, said on CNN: “There is a massive apparatus within the United States government that with complete secrecy has been building this enormous structure that has only one goal, and that is to destroy privacy and anonymity, not just in the United States but around the world.” And France 24 reports on WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange: The U.S. justice system was suffering from a “calamitous collapse in the rule of law.”
Big Brother is watching your taxes, following your travel, monitoring your email, counting your phone calls, photographing your car, spying on your shopping, invading your privacy, attacking your rights, shadowing your life and deciding whether you are on approved or disapproved lists.
Big Brother is big government united with big business. Big Brother is Barack Obama united with George W. Bush. Opposition to Big Brother unites Matt Drudge with conservative libertarians such as former Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) and liberal libertarians such as Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
Let's put Big Brother in Guantanamo, so long as there is a Guantanamo. When I worked for House Democratic leaders, I was in the loop on much of this secret stuff and know a lot but can say little about this subject.
Who would of thought to see the Russian ambassador sitting between two
of America’s intelligence anchors to discuss cooperation and
On May 28, just after Memorial Day, the Institute for Education (IFE) hosted three esteemed members of Washington’s brain trust at the Federal City Council to discuss how the U.S. national security landscape has changed in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombing in April. As part of IFE’s INFO Global Connections Series Roundtable, His Excellency Sergey Kislyak, Russian ambassador to the U.S.; Gen. Michael Hayden, former director of the CIA and National Security Agency; and Ambassador John Negroponte, former director of National Intelligence, shared their thoughts, in particular, on the balance Americans have struck between security and freedom.
The language of the daily newspaper, at least the doorway to what is behind in mind and soul, and initial-response headlines this morning suggest we are not yet fully ready to defend ourselves.
A Drudge Report headline, for example, tells that Fox (correctly) pulls an episode of the (loathsome) "Family Guy" show with a joke about people being killed during a Boston Marathon.
Glad I can clear that up for you Mr. President, David Axelrod and Chris Matthews.
President Obama's consistent reluctance to call violent acts of terrorism "terrorism" is becoming increasingly more disturbing, with him taking a full day to refer to the Boston bombing as an "act of terror."