Homeland Security

Dems and terror

The Obama administration, coming under fire for administering Miranda rights to Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab just 50 minutes after questioning him about his attempted bombing on Christmas Day aboard a Northwest Airlines flight, has begun to rethink several key national security questions. This week we learned from House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) that the White House is revisiting a plan to transfer detainees from Guantanamo Bay to a prison in Thomson, Ill. And we know from key Democrats, though the Department of Justice continues to deny it, that the trial for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed won't be taking place in New York City after all.


KSM rules NYC

The terrorists won by forcing cowardly politicians, both Republicans and Democrats, to undermine Attorney General Eric Holder’s plans to bring KSM to trial in lower Manhattan, within blocks of the scene of the crime, ground zero.

By so loudly opposing the New York City venue, of course, Republicans are outright hypocrites. For eight years, under George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, the policy of the United States was to bring terrorist suspects to trial in federal civilian court, most of them in New York. According to Human Rights Watch, they brought 119 such cases following Sept. 11, with a 91 percent conviction rate. And that included two high-profile security trials: shoe bomber Richard Reid in Boston and al Qaeda operative Zacarias Moussaoui in Alexandria, Va.


Citzenship, partisanship and common ground in the war on terror

In the two weeks since an alleged terrorist tried to detonate an explosive device on a flight bound for Detroit — in what has become known as the Christmas Day bombing attempt — there has been no shortage of finger-pointing in Washington about who is to blame for a very close call.


Obama now owns another war

It took President Obama two weeks to step forward and deliver a decisive response to the foiled Christmas Day bombing and more than a year to own the war on terror. But yesterday, in remarks accepting full responsibility for the lapse in security that led to the Northwest Airlines incident, he did both.

In detailing just how his administration failed to integrate intelligence that showed the potential danger Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab posed to the United States, and how he has ordered reviews across the entire system to improve the sharing of such intelligence, Obama took an inadequate system over for good.


Disconnecting the disconnected dot connectors

So there was President Barack Obama with his stern face, telling the world still again that the system failed, trying to assure one and all he is serious, “less interested in placing blame than I am in correcting these mistakes.”

But isn't a little blame in order? The one thing the "Underwear Bomber" accomplished with his inept attempt to cause calamity is that his blundering was easily matched by those whose job it is to see these kinds of things coming. They are, after all, in charge of the sprawling, gazillion-dollar apparatus that is supposed to "connect the dots.”


Amateur hour is over

Enough is enough. There was a time when the amateur hour that has characterized the behavior of the staff in the Obama White House over the past year could be chalked up to innocent inexperience. Now that behavior is nothing short of dangerous and President Barack Obama is being ill served by those by those closest around him: Mr. Cool must lose his cool and fire those staff members who have failed their president and failed their nation.


Dick Cheney, neocon wars and the politics of terror

Let’s first discard certain right-wing theorists who know nothing about war in real life, and certain extreme partisans who view the death of Americans from acts of terror as just another excuse for their uncontrollable partisanship that knows no limits and has no shame. For six years I worked on the CIA Intelligence Identities Protection Act, subject of the famous CIA leak case, with its original sponsor, Sen. Lloyd Bentsen (D-Texas). For more than two decades I have worked with every aspect of intelligence and counterintelligence.


Kill them before they kill us!

After the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, al Qaeda brazenly declared its goal of building an Islamic empire that would wipe out the “infidels” (read this as you and me).

Since then, there have been at least 29 foiled terror plots against the United States.

The terrorists intend to destroy us. They will strike again. They have told us so — most recently with the botched attempt by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to detonate an explosive device aboard a Northwest Airlines flight.


Reversing field for a bold response

It took former Vice President Dick Cheney mocking President Barack Obama to fire up the stoic, no-drama, vacationing White House last week and provoke the ultimate response — sending John Brennan, Obama's counterterrorism adviser, out to the Sunday shows to hit back at Cheney. It was the exactly the kind of response they should have used out of the box.


So now we're at war?

I was quite interested to hear President Barack Obama declare in his remarks this past Saturday that America is a country at war.

To be sure, the signals coming from the president and his administration in the days following the attempted terrorist attack on our soil Christmas Day have been both muted and mixed. First, press secretary Robert Gibbs and Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano sought to assure us that the "system" worked following the attempted murder of hundreds of Americans aboard a jetliner on final approach to Detroit. The only thing that worked was that the would-be terrorist martyr was able to elude scrutiny and place himself aboard a flight to the United States after (1) purchasing a one-way airline ticket to America after (2) his father had warned American officials as to the "radicalization" of his son and (3) said terrorist was placed on a watch list by American authorities. The system worked, indeed.