|
|
|
|
|
October 7, 2009, 9:25 am
By
Armstrong Williams
Unfortunately, a critical shift in the paradigm through which our nation accesses foreign policy has been dramatically modified, leaving America at the mercy of the most vicious of totalitarian dictators the world has to offer.
Over the past month, President Barack Obama continues to naively put America’s security at grave risk. At the United Nations General Assembly meeting in September, Obama unintentionally announced his “Hope Doctrine” to promote world peace.
Read more...
Archived under:
Homeland Security, The Administration
|
|
July 14, 2009, 10:18 am
By
A.B. Stoddard
Archived under:
Healthcare, Homeland Security, Lawmaker News, Media, The Administration, The Judiciary
|
June 17, 2009, 7:37 am
By
Ronald Goldfarb
There are two revolutions going on in Iran. A hopeful political one that is very much in the news. And a side revolution, as well: in journalism about the revolution, the very news that is describing the political unrest surrounding the recent election. Of the latter, more will come to pass, and better experts will comment on it. On the latter, however, the world is witnessing an evolving phenomenon regarding news reporting.
Read more...
Archived under:
Foreign Policy, Homeland Security, Media
|
June 15, 2009, 12:34 pm
By
Cheri Jacobus
CIA Director Leon Panetta got into trouble with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) when he rightfully called into question her claims that the CIA had lied to her and Congress about the use of enhanced interrogation methods. He made the mistake of telling the truth.
Now, several weeks later, Panetta's presented Madam Speaker with a big bouquet of flowers, neatly tied with a bow, as he uttered what will likely end up being the most regrettable statement of his life:
Read more...
Archived under:
Homeland Security, Lawmaker News
|
June 11, 2009, 9:56 am
By
Ron Christie
In case you've missed it: Earlier this year, President Obama told the CBS “60 Minutes” program and the American people that he didn't believe terrorists were entitled to Miranda rights. We've all seen and heard these rights being read on television, but I'll put them here for handy reference:
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, an attorney will be appointed for you.
Prior to interrogating a suspect in police custody, officers must read words similar to those above and the suspect must acknowledge the waiver of such rights if an interrogation is to commence to satisfy Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination.
Read more...
Archived under:
Crime, Homeland Security
|
June 2, 2009, 11:54 am
By
A.B. Stoddard
Just two weeks after the Guantanamo Bay issue blew up on President Obama and his own party refused to fund its closing, things have only grown more bleak for his plans to shutter the prison by Jan. 22, 2010. As I have written here, it was his first great mistake — an ambitious deadline to solve an enormous problem set in the exuberance of the first week in his historic presidency without consulting the U.S. Congress.
Read more...
Archived under:
Homeland Security, The Administration
|
|
June 1, 2009, 12:44 pm
By
A.B. Stoddard
The Hill's A.B. Stoddard answers viewer questions about issues surrounding the Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor, and how President Obama should handle closing the Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp.
Archived under:
Homeland Security, Lawmaker News, The Administration, The Judiciary
|
June 1, 2009, 3:22 am
By
Armstrong Williams
The United States treaty and criminal prohibition against torture contains no exceptions. There is no ticking-time-bomb exception. There is no “High Value Detainee” exception. There is no urgent-information exception. Of course, such exceptions can be made part of the law if Congress amends the anti-torture law or the president revokes the torture treaty. But neither was done during the Bush administration.
The United States prosecuted “waterboarding,” i.e., simulated drowning, as torture during World War II when practiced by the Japanese against American captives. The United States law prohibiting torture defines it as creating an imminent fear of death that causes prolonged mental pain or suffering. Republican Department of Homeland Security chief Tom Ridge declared that waterboarding constitutes torture under United States laws. Yet neither the Bush nor Obama administrations have done anything to criminally investigate waterboarding as torture.
Read more...
Archived under:
Homeland Security
|
May 26, 2009, 4:23 am
By
Lanny Davis
The following appeared originally in The Washington Times of Monday, May 25.
I began having second thoughts about last week's column urging the indictment of former Vice President Dick Cheney for approving the use of waterboarding and other forms of illegal torture, shortly after it was published and posted last Monday morning — days before the Obama-Cheney back-to-back speeches Thursday.
Read more...
Archived under:
Homeland Security, The Administration
|
|
May 22, 2009, 11:12 am
By
Armstrong Williams
With torture dominating the news headlines, Armstrong Williams takes a look at when and why the U.S. would use methods like waterboarding.
Archived under:
Foreign Policy, Homeland Security, The Military
|