Joe ManchinJoseph (Joe) ManchinOvernight Energy: EPA aims to work more closely with industry Overnight Finance: Lawmakers grill Equifax chief over hack | Wells Fargo CEO defends bank's progress | Trump jokes Puerto Rico threw budget 'out of whack' | Mortgage tax fight tests industry clout Lawmakers try again on miners’ pension bill MORE, the new senator from West Virginia, put it pretty well. President Obama has “failed to lead,” he said.

I might have put it differently. Obama has failed to even show up.

Woody Allen once said that nine-tenths of any job is just showing up. The president is not currently meeting that threshold.

The president has not only failed to lead on the budget negotiations. He is leaving that job to Joe BidenJoseph (Joe) Robinette BidenReport: Biden to write foreword for memoir by transgender activist Biden to Alabama: No more extremist senators Kasich, Biden to hold discussion on bipartisanship MORE and Harry ReidHarry ReidChris Murphy’s profile rises with gun tragedies Republicans are headed for a disappointing end to their year in power Obama's HHS secretary could testify in Menendez trial MORE. Well, let’s be clear. He is leaving all of the negotiations to Harry Reid, the man who just barely beat Sharron Angle last year.

When it comes to entitlement reform, the president once again was a no-show. His new budget director, Jack LewJacob (Jack) Joseph LewBipartisan bill would force Treasury to put Tubman on bill Top conservative rails against ‘clean’ debt limit increase Trump mocked Obama for three chiefs of staff in three years MORE, who by all accounts is a nice guy, improbably said that the president didn’t unveil a plan to deal with entitlements because he didn’t want to inject partisanship into the debate.

No offense, Mr. Lew, but I find that explanation to be fanciful. The president didn’t want to unveil a plan because he doesn’t have a plan, and he doesn’t have a plan because he doesn’t want a plan, and he doesn’t want a plan because he doesn’t believe that entitlements need to be changed in any way, shape or form.

That is why the president didn’t endorse the recommendations that came from his own deficit commission. He ran away from them as fast as he could.

When it comes to the crisis in Libya, the president has been embarrassingly absent. He is more than a step behind, and his vacillating leadership is giving Moammar Gadhafi great confidence that he can survive this challenge to his rule.

Obama's indecisiveness on Libya was preceded by confusion on Egypt, which was preceded by bewilderment in Tunisia. Obama seems uncertain, clueless and largely absent from all the major conflicts in the world.

And that includes the conflict in Wisconsin. The president first decided to back the protesters in Madison until he read the polls and decided that wasn’t such a good idea. Now, he is just a bystander to the conflict, refusing to put in a good word for the taxpayers while also refusing to say anything about those AWOL state senators who presumably still get paid for not showing up to work.

Where’s Waldo? was a series of children’s books that depicted big groups of people doing a variety of funny things at a certain place. The challenge for kids, of course, was to find where Waldo was. Today, there are big groups of people doing a bunch of not-so-amusing things, and the challenge for the American people is to figure out where the president is. The problem is that it is just about impossible to find the president taking a leadership position on any of the big issues of the day. If you don’t believe me, just ask Joe Manchin.