Had the Syria vote in Congress occurred on Monday, when members had returned from recess, it would probably have narrowly passed the Senate, certainly been defeated in the House and definitely been a disaster for the worldwide credibility and deterrent capability for the U.S. and all nations opposing the criminal use of chemical weapons.
What a difference a day makes!
There are two key points regarding the Russian proposal for Syria to turn over its chemical weapons to an international authority:
In prelude to that cultural movement which became the Tea Party, there was much talk of the U.N., the World Court and varied enterprises that had evolved from like-minded urban dwellers across Europe and America. We had little regard, because we felt no sovereign instincts outside our own borders.
Our moral intuition about things beyond our turf was an abstraction. It is for everyone. But as rumors of invasion grew, and neocons in D.C. talked openly of randomly invading various countries in the Middle East, even with already psychologically embedded mainstream media, how could they be held back? What could be done?
We could not have cared less about the U.N.’s condemnation, but how could we stop those who were planning death abroad from our own turf? In 2003 the first claims were made in Vermont and New Hampshire that we had the constitutional and moral right as states not to participate after a Rhodes Scholar with lifelong distinguished government service in Russia and Vietnam claimed in The New Yorker that the invasion of Iraq was likely against international law. But what could we do? Could we not just throw them in jail? Could we not today?
In my latest column, I suggested that the coming vote in Congress is one of the great moral and security moments of our time. I praised and criticized various Democrats and Republicans.
Now I focus on one Republican in particular, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), whose performance this week was shameless; and to a lesser degree, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), whose hypocrisy in talking tough for two years and then voting against military action was a sad sight to behold.
Not long ago, Paul, who never served in the military, chastised Secretary of State John Kerry, a decorated war hero, for not remembering what combat is like. Is there any shame left in Republican presidential wannabes?
Canada faces a crisis. Don Cherry, "Grapes" to friends, soon turns 80. It is as primary a crisis as can come to a happy people: Recall England without Victoria. Darkness descended. Cherry is to Canada what Uncle Sam was to America. He appears every Saturday night in his Coach’s Corner segment of Hockey Night in Canada. When he passes, Canada will feel an emptiness. And it will come at an awkward time, as Canada is just now rising in the world.
One day our secretary of State is negotiating with intense commitment, passion and skill to bring Israelis and Palestinians together in search of peace.
The next day, the secretary of State is championing strong action to stop mass murder by Syria including barbaric and criminal use of chemical weapons.
Secretary of State John Kerry, a man of military heroism and diplomatic savvy, is a man for all seasons who knows the ropes and speaks the truth. Kerry is right to make Herculean efforts for Middle East peace and to make equally Herculean efforts to hold Syrian leaders — mass murderers who commit crimes against humanity — accountable for their criminal slaughters.
As Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and BFF John McCain (R-Ariz.) head to Egypt on President Obama’s orders, should not Nancy Mace, who brings Graham a primary challenge, take a trip to Israel to establish contrast? Mace has the opportunity here to educate and awaken Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Ted Cruz (R-Texas), the avant garde of the rising conservative generation, just as Dorothy did her erstwhile triumvirate on their journey to Oz.