Lawmaker News

Thank God! Congress Saves Christmas!

Members of Congress are always threatening to ban frivolous lawsuits. Maybe they should begin by banning frivolous acts of Congress.

Case in point: a resolution actually voted on and approved by the House of Representatives this week declaring that Christmas is important.

It was a tough fight. Debate was fierce. Emotions ran high. But, in the end, advocates of Christmas managed to squeeze out a narrow victory, 372-9. The United States Congress is now officially on record as acknowledging “the international religious and historical importance of Christmas and the Christian faith.”
Read More...

Henry Hyde

Most people will remember Henry Hyde for his commitment to the unborn or for his role in the impeachment of Bill Clinton (a role he assumed with no great pleasure).

I remember Henry Hyde as simply the greatest orator of his generation.

Watching Hyde speak on the House floor was like watching Larry Bird play basketball or Tiger Woods play golf or Ted Williams swing a baseball bat. It was mesmerizing.
Read More...

Troops Out! - Or Still There?

I've just put up our latest Quick Poll! question: "Will there be fewer than 100,000 US troops in Iraq on Election Day next year?" Scroll down the page and vote. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) is contemplating legislation that would give Republican senators electoral cover to change administration policy while not pulling the rug out from beneath President Bush (See story in The Hill, Thursday, Nov 15).
Read More...

Bear Any Burden?

A report put together by some Democratic staffers of the Joint Economic Committee (JEC) said war costs would hit $1.6 trillion by the end of next year, doubling the $804 billion spent or requested by the administration. This includes both the war in Iraq and the war in Afghanistan.

Democratic leaders unveiled the report as they plotted their latest bid to force Bush's hand on Iraq, warning he would not get any more money for the war this year — unless he agreed to troop withdrawal timetables.
Read More...

Let's Have a Conversation

OK, so now she's getting rapped for not tipping a waitress when she said she really did, and so today I feel sorry for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.). But how did the gender card play with you? It has been a whole 48 hours since the week-long story of Clinton as victim of the big boys, getting eaten up at a debate by those big mean boys. I wrote in my column this week about how Team Clinton pushed the story because they saw it as an opportunity. They must have run the calculation and crunched the numbers that this would make her look weak and decided it was worth it anyway. But I agree with what Tucker Carlson said on his MSNBC show this week, that Clinton's strength is her strength.
Read More...

Hillary's Earmarks

In today's issue of The Hill, on the front page, is an article reporting that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) topped her presidential rivals in securing earmarks from the taxpayers. In laudatory terms, the article gropes for an explanation for her success, speculating on the impact of seniority and connections.

The article misses the point, clear to everybody else on earth, that earmarking is not something to be proud of. It is an abuse of legislative power that robs taxpayers of money and diverts it to pet projects, usually closely linked to campaign contributions to the friendly legislator who lined up the money. The article should have speculated on whether Hillary can live down the distinction of being the earmark queen rather than laud her for her effectiveness at ripping off the taxpayers.
Read More...

Disjointed Thoughts on a Friday

With your indulgence, I will give you some disjointed thoughts today.

My good friend Al Felzenberg, who teaches a communications course at the Annenberg School at the University of Pennsylvania, invited me up to give his students some of my thoughts on my former job as a press secretary. I gladly accepted because I wanted to see what was on the students’ minds.

I expected them to be concerned about the environment, and of course, they were. But what they mentioned most to me was America’s declining prestige around the world, linking that to the precipitous fall in the value of the dollar. Frankly, the kids just didn’t seem that optimistic about our nation’s future, although they all were very patriotic.
Read More...

The Impeachment of Vice President Cheney

Just when you thought the Democrats in charge of running the House of Representatives had received the message that the American people wanted them to govern, not posture, Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) brought a resolution to the floor today in an effort to impeach the vice president. Now, I happen to like the congressman personally — he’s quirky, to be sure, but very passionate about his beliefs, something I respect. Having worked with Kucinich over the years when I was a member of former Rep. John Kasich’s (R-Ohio) staff, we got along rather well — a relationship that I’ve enjoyed to this day.
Read More...

What Are They Up to Now?

During a presidential election year, congressional majorities don’t have much of a chance to make an impression. The media is fixated on the horse-race for the White House, and if there are other things going on, Congress gets nary a mention.

These days, congressional Democrats have even less of a chance to make much of a positive impression. The presidential contest is wide open, there’s a war in Iraq, global warming panic is gripping the media, and the world seems to be collapsing in many other different places (like Pakistan and Burma).

That is why it is so curious that congressional Democrats are using their precious little time chasing after a partisan witch hunt that will yield little positive press for their side.
Read More...

Democrats Hand Bush Another Win

Use it or lose it. It’s true about many things, and it’s especially true about political power. Once you get power, if you don’t use it to help bring about the things you believe in, you might as well give it up.

But, sadly, that’s how it is with Democrats today.

They were elected to end the war, but when George Bush vetoed their timetable for bringing the troops home, Democrats gave him all the money he wanted for Iraq, no strings attached.
Read More...

Pages