Lawmaker News

Reid blasts Banana Republican shutdown; House GOP centrists begin to revolt

Harry Reid blasted them Wednesday. I blasted them last Thursday in my column. America is blasting them in polls showing that approval of the Tea Party has fallen to record lows. In fact, Obama's approval rating towers above the Tea Party's. Public approval of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi (California) is well above the Tea Party's. 


GOP on Cruz control

Republican Party leaders and top GOP donors can top off their bad week with even more challenging news: Sen. Ted Cruz (Texas) is now the top contender among possible 2016 Republican presidential hopefuls, jumping 8 points since July, according to a new Public Policy Polling survey.

The Cruz-ade, as I called it in my column this week, to defund ObamaCare or shutdown the government has taken the Texan to new heights in only two months since he began pushing for something he knew could not be achieved. Money has been raised, along with his profile, and ObamaCare is right where it was before, save for a few delays the administration — not Republicans— has imposed.


Ted Cruz: God's gift to Barack Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi

Regarding my new column, Banana Republicans 2013, here is the inside: The smartest Republican strategists, major Republican donors, and even some Republican leaders in Congress (whom I criticized) privately agree with me.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) is the best thing that has happened to Democrats since "Brownie" handled Katrina for Bush 43, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is playing him like a violin. Let him talk, and the more voters who hear Cruz, the better for Democrats.


George H.W. Bush’s socks and the end of the world

I could not help but notice that former President George H.W. Bush, serving as an official witness Saturday at the Maine wedding of Bonnie Clement and Helen Thorgalsen, co-owners of a Kennebunk general store, was wearing one blue sock and one red sock. It was not an accident; wife Barbara was on hand, signing as well. They do not let the former president who brought traditional New England cachet and karma to weigh down the first important president from the West, Ronald Reagan, appear dotty, especially when signing the charter for a gay marriage. But what I found troubling is that the blue sock was on the right foot and the red sock on the left foot. This is the way the world ends.


Ted Cruz should resign from the Senate and run for president

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) should resign from the Senate and run for president in 2016. Cruz can no longer effectively represent Texans because he is almost universally disrespected by House and Senate Republicans, as well as Democrats. 

His erratic behavior surrounding ObamaCare is merely the latest example of "The Ted Cruz Show" in which this politician is wasting taxpayer money on shameless personal politics and legislatively ineffective self-promotion.


Consensus — and time — in short supply

Keeping your eyes on the sad Syria crisis may actually be more comforting than paying attention to the Congress's inability to pass a bill to keep the government open.

The few days of September scheduled for legislating — in the House it was only nine — are slipping away, swallowed up initially by President Obama's bungled response to the chemical attack in Syria. Indeed, with the end of the fiscal year coming Sept. 30, consensus is nowhere to be found.


Syria: Obama is Winston Churchill compared to Rand Paul, Ted Cruz and Alan Grayson

On the matter of war crimes by the Assad regime in Syria, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) literally offer no policy and no ideas about how to stop the slaughter of innocent people with chemical weapons.

Read them carefully. Listen to them closely. They have nothing coherent to say. They suggest nothing effective to do. By contrast, President Obama has taken the initiative and offers a course of action that will send a message to Bashar Assad and reduce his capability of using chemical weapons for mass murder against innocent people.


Alan Grayson vs. Barack Obama

The Syrian debacle spawns new directions. Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) appears, wearing a peace symbol tie, on PBS "NewsHour", in The New York Times and everywhere else this weekend. His analysis was lucid and well-articulated — better, in my opinion than any of the others. Pundits can’t recall a time when left factions have so closely aligned with those of the right in opposition to a specific issue. I can: Watergate. And like Watergate, it all seemed so spontaneous and unplanned, as if an accident or a simple twist of fate.

Below is a selection of Grayson’s comments. I was especially surprised by the PBS interview excerpted here, courtesy of NewsBusters:


A states’ rights defense against Barack Obama

The Wall Street Journal’s Bret Stephens says an attack on Syria without regime change — taking out Assad — would be “feckless.” Other mainstream conservatives say random and indecisive, certain to bring payback. Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) say it is a case of American global status, which is an immoral assessment, a product of arrested and unbalanced development.

New York Times regular Nicholas D. Kristof says, “Striking Syria now may seem inconsistent, but it’s better than consistently doing nothing in the face of atrocities,” which is immoral also: Just go out there and kill a bunch of those Indians.

But this, vengeance, really is the basis of much military action: Revenge, retaliation, about something historic. Atlanta was the price of Southern secession; Nagasaki was the price of Pearl Harbor. And to our immediate times: Iraq was a direct, gut response to 9/11. President Obama’s consideration now on Syria is identical to the Cheney/Bush invasion of Iraq.


The Ted Cruz birther problem

Let's see if every Republican, Tea Party advocate and rightist who raised the birther issue against President Obama will publicly state that Ted Cruz should not run for president because his dual citizenship with Canada should disqualify him.

Don't get me wrong. I do not believe the issue should disqualify Cruz, despite my lack of esteem for his politics. I don't think it should matter if Cruz has or had dual citizenship. But imagine what the right would do if Matt Drudge bannered a revelation that President Obama is a dual citizen with another country!