Quijano's bias of omission in debate follows Holt's playbook
© Greg Nash

What is it about Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonBiden slams Trump over golf gif hitting Clinton Overnight Cybersecurity: Equifax hit by earlier hack | What to know about Kaspersky controversy | Officials review EU-US privacy pact Overnight Tech: Equifax hit by earlier undisclosed hack | Facebook takes heat over Russian ads | Alt-right Twitter rival may lose domain MORE's email and Clinton Foundation controversies that presidential and vice presidential debate moderators are apparently allergic to?

We've now had 180 minutes of debate between Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpBiden slams Trump over golf gif hitting Clinton Trump Jr. declines further Secret Service protection: report Report: Mueller warned Manafort to expect an indictment MORE, Hillary Clinton, Mike PenceMichael (Mike) Richard PenceNew GOP ObamaCare repeal bill gains momentum Pence hires Freedom Caucus adviser for press secretary Lawmakers, pick up the ball on health care and reform Medicaid MORE and Tim KaineTimothy Michael KaineWeek ahead: Crunch time for defense bill’s cyber reforms | Equifax under scrutiny Insurer Anthem to cover bare ObamaCare counties in Virginia Senate votes down Paul's bid to revoke war authorizations MORE. And these two obvious topics — two of the Clinton campaign's biggest vulnerabilities — have not been directly addressed to Clinton or Kaine in two events watched by at least 120 million people.

ADVERTISEMENT
The question to NBC’s Lester Holt and CBS’s Elaine Quijano is a simple one: Why?

Quijano's second question in the debate was about Clinton's character and mentioned the email and Clinton Foundation controversies, but the question was not pointed at all and allowed Kaine to easily skirt both issues.

"Sen. Kaine, on the campaign trail, you praised Secretary Clinton's character, including her commitment to public service, yet 60 percent of voters don't think she's trustworthy," Quijano said. "Why do so many people distrust her? Is it because they have questions about her emails and the Clinton Foundation?" 

In his answer, Kaine said that he trusted Clinton and then managed to pivot to criticisms of Trump and the birther issue without even mentioning the foundation or email scandals. 

Quijano didn't both to follow up — at the time or in the more than an hour of questioning that followed. 

Yet in the next section of the debate, after a question to Pence about polls showing many Americans think Trump is "erratic," Quijano offered two follow-up questions to Pence about the disconnect with Trump as the GOP vice presidential candidate pivoted to criticism of Clinton. 

Both Quijano and Holt were considered seasoned, sound, smart, non-partisan journalists going into their respective debates. And Clinton's mishandling of emails, the destruction of evidence, the staff members all electing to plead the fifth and/or be granted immunity is easily the largest shadow over her campaign against an equally flawed (for different reasons) opponent.

The Clinton Foundation also deserves infinitely more scrutiny from Clinton and Kaine given the access donors received, the appointments given to donors, donations in return for speeches from former President Bill ClintonBill ClintonGOP rep: North Korea wants Iran-type nuclear deal Lawmakers, pick up the ball on health care and reform Medicaid The art of the small deal MORE, and the donations from foreign governments, just to name a few parts of the laundry list.

But does any of these vulnerabilities get broached by Holt or Quijano?

Nope.

The New York Times, not exactly a bastion of conservative sentiment, first had this to say about Quijano's performance last night:

“Elaine Quijano, the moderator, helped Mr. Kaine along, opening one question with a recitation of Mr. Trump’s statements.”

Curiously however, the Times has since scrubbed the analysis above. No editor's note was made regarding the deletion.

It has been said in this space that Executive Editor Dean Baquet doesn't remotely have the integrity to hold responsibility at the paper of record. And on a regular basis, he keeps proving the sentiment right.

But back to Quijano. She showed her inexperience as having never moderated a debate in spades last night. Control was fleeting, particularly as it pertained to an overzealous — and patently annoying by many pundit accounts — Tim Kaine, who decidedly lost the debate after Clinton won hers by an average margin of about 30 points last week.

All told by The Hill's count, Kaine interrupted Pence and Quijano 70 times in 90 minutes.

And when Quijano was allowing to Kaine to mostly run roughshod over the presentation, she didn't allow illuminating exchanges to go on longer when the dialogue absolutely warranted doing so.

Former Obama campaign chief strategist CNN contributor David Axelrod summed up the popular sentiment thusly:

It was allergy season in Virginia last night.

Elaine Quijano certainly caught them last night.

No email questions. Nothing pointed about the Clinton Foundation.

It was Lester Holt 2.0 on the moderating front.

Yet the Republican still somehow came out on top.

Trump and Clinton meet again this Sunday night. ABC's Martha Raddatz and CNN's Anderson Cooper will moderate.

The question is: Will these two break the string of two debates by actually asking a Democrat in the room something resembling a difficult question?

Concha is a media reporter for The Hill


The views of Contributors are their own and are not the views of The Hill