THE HILL
 

Obama’s attempted freeze-out

By Armstrong Williams - 10/23/09 09:29 AM ET

As questions intensify about what President Barack Obama has actually accomplished, the administration has taken to the offensive by attacking Fox News.

On Thursday, the administration announced that White House pay czar Kenneth Feinberg would give interviews to all of the members of the White House TV pool — CNN, ABC, NBC and CBS — except Fox News. The attempted strong-arm tactic follows a series of critical remarks by White House officials aimed at discrediting Fox News. Appearing on CNN, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel said that the administration is essentially blacklisting Fox News because the president doesn't want "the CNNs and the others in the world [to] be led in following Fox." Emanuel later added that Fox News “is not a news organization so much as it has a perspective." Translation: The American president is attempting to co-opt the national dialogue by censuring an entire news organization.


The administration’s tack is both obvious and appalling. With the president’s healthcare proposal floundering, the administration is clearly trying to distract the public by shifting the focus to Fox News. This is the oldest play in the book: Unable or unwilling to defend criticism of its policies, the administration has taken to attacking its critics.

Yet the breadth of those attacks is truly alarming. This country has a rich First Amendment tradition that is animated by the idea that a free press is the surest safeguard against government tyranny. Our First Amendment safeguards are predicated on the idea that through the friction of diverse perspectives the truth always rises up. This rich tradition trusts the voting populace to cut through the cacophony of opinion and to make self-interested decisions. By attempting to censure an entire news network, the administration is not only trampling on the First Amendment, it is displaying an appalling lack of faith in the American populace. This kind of arrogance is near-tyrannical.

This point was not lost on the other bureau chiefs in the White House TV pool, who vigorously objected to the White House’s attempt to freeze out Fox News, ultimately forcing it to relent. The rest of the media rightly recognized that if the administration can exclude media whose opinions it doesn't respect or like, no media organization in the future will be exempt from exclusion. It may be a conservative organization that is excluded from the administrations interview today, but in three years it could be the liberal mainstream organization being excluded. Hooray for the liberal media who are finally waking up to the fact that Emperor Obama is attempting to co-opt the freedom of the press.

Of course, the great irony in all of this is that the administration’s attacks have only benefited Fox News. As News Corp Chairman Rupert Murdoch observed, "All I can tell you is that it's tremendously increased their ratings."


Williams can be heard nightly on Sirius/XM Power 169 from 9 to 10 p.m. EST.

Visit www.armstrongwilliams.com .

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/media/64497-obamas-attempted-freeze-out

Comments (30)

restating a comment and claiming it as your basis is rather disingenous as well as misleading..Classic case of 'cognitive dissonance'. ArmstrongBY docb on 10/23/2009 at 12:18
Why is The Hill associating with this corrupt operative who's only interested in lining his own pockets? He is in no position to attack anyone's integrity, and severely damages The Hill's credibility. There are honest, decent conservatives out there who can actually write. Get one.BY Remmy on 10/23/2009 at 12:57
i am glad the mainstream media is finally waking up and realizing the truth, foxnews was right about acorn, van ones, jennings, and they have the video and audio to back it up, the mainstream is scared to piss off obama because they see how he has thrown all who dissagree with him under the bus and they know they could be next if they dont stand up for foxnews. you never hear anything about acorn,seiu or any of his radical, confirmed czars or his other associations on the regular news, only on foxnews, they are the only ones keeping up with what is going on and calling them out. the whitehouse is acting like spoiled little kids and even had the woman controlling the wh media admit on camera that the w.h. was controlling what the media said. and yes, she is on video admitting it, but you will never see this or anything else bad about the w h on mainstream tv or papers. the mainstream media is nothing more than a sell out.BY cargo65 on 10/23/2009 at 13:02
I used to go to CNN first to get the news. I used to watch the News Hour on PBS. I got so fed up with the biased pro Obama news that I switched to FOX news but I also read The Hill and even the Huffington Post. I feel that Obama is just what the name without the vowels is.BY Grayfos88 on 10/23/2009 at 14:08
WE HAVE HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF OUR FINEST YOUNG MEN AND WOMEN STATIONED ALL OVER THE WORLD DEFENDING OUR FREEDOM AND RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH. WE HAVE A P RESIDENT AND CONGRESS THAT IS TRYING EVERY DAY TO TAKE THESE FREEEDOMS AWAY FROM US. LET US NOT HAVE THESE RIGHTS TAKEN AWAY BY OUR GOVERNMENT. WE NEED TO VOTE THEMN OUT OF OFFICE.BY Wayne on 10/23/2009 at 14:09
Maybe the administration is scared of Fox or they were never taught "keep your friends close and your enemies closer". Either way Mr. Obama has yet to act presidential and perhaps never will.BY LESC on 10/23/2009 at 14:18
To Wayne and Les and the rest of the nut ball fringe;Obama is not taking away Fox's free speech rights. What it is doing is flatly stating that they will talk with them when they want to. Fox Noise has declared war on the Obama presidency and the WH has decided to fight back. What other News network has ever promoted a political rally or event designed to oppose the current administration? None except Fox. Therefore Fox is not a new netowrk.BY Mike Coleman on 10/23/2009 at 16:20
The mainstream media is supported by advertising. Advertising gravitates to demographics as the ratings reveal. If Fox's ratings are increasing and the other media outlets do not gravitate their programming to correlate to the ratings we will over time be left with fewer media outlets. All media has bias, money, without it they will go bankrupt. That is why I am a bit perplexed by the actions of the administration. If they attack the Fox outlet and if it contributes to increased viewership and further alienates that audience will that not in time hurt the media outlets the administration prefers? Kinda cutting off their nose to spite their face.BY jadedfellow on 10/23/2009 at 16:40
Dear Mr. Coleman, If media is the outlet of information to individuals in a society, (that includes news or opinion), why would the administration choose to isolate a portion of society? I have always questioned the message of all media simply from the standpoint that due to time constraints, some elements of data/information have to be left out to fit with programming constraints. The decision to leave out data/information usually is a subjective decision and that requires a variety of media inputs to better understand the complexity of issues. I challenge your statement that Fox has declared war on this administration in that if their holy war was not credible or desired by a segment of society they would have lost the battle long ago. It's the viewers that are behind this and if the administration is in defense mode they are defending themselves from a segment of society. That is scary!BY jadedfellow on 10/23/2009 at 17:26
Just how much more are the people going to take from this Administration.I don't think we can wait for another year and have these people running our Country.These people are going after Fox and talk radio and this thing they call Net neutrality.But it is the fairness doctrine for the Internet.BY Robert Munyan on 10/23/2009 at 17:30

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.