THE HILL
 

Scoundrel stars

By Ronald Goldfarb - 11/16/09 03:43 PM ET

I didn’t understand it then, and I still don’t. When many of the Watergate defendants, some convicted criminals, got lucrative book contracts and became media stars, I wondered. Why weren’t they committing suicide or running off to New Zealand and changing their names? Since when was scandal a credential for fame and fortune? I’m reminded of this phenomenon reading two newspaper stories today. A columnist in The Miami Herald reports that “Jayson Blair, the plagiarizing, fabricate-as-you-go former New York Times reporter, was invited to speak to journalism students at Washington and Lee University, on, of all things, ethics.” Blair’s talk was about losing his ethical way, but it seems to me that a fine university like Washington and Lee might have found a more virtuous lecturer on journalistic ethics than one whose claim to fame — or infamy — is having ignored those very ethical standards about which he was recruited to lecture.

The other story, in The New York Times, is the brilliant Michiko Kakutani’s review of Sarah Palin’s about-to-be published political memoir, Going Rogue, for which she reportedly received a $5 million advance and which already has engendered breathless media attention. Palin has many fans, no doubt, but her book was written “with an assist” from Lynn Vincent, an evangelical magazine writer. Few of her readers, and no doubt her publisher, who paid so well for her book, expect that Palin is an author worthy of a huge advance. She is a celebrity, and one whose intellectual talents have been mocked widely. But notoriety sells books, her experience reminds us.

As one who writes books (11 so far) and has negotiated sales of many books by serious writers, it irks me to have to beg for modest advances for talented authors with interesting and often important things to say. Monica Lewinsky received a larger advance for her book about the Clinton scandal she participated in than did professional authors who wrote serious analyses of the same subject. Sour grapes, some would say. But I deplore the value system that underwrites this phenomenon. After all, it is the world of “literature” under discussion, a world that has been eclipsed by the public interest in entertainment, and often scandalous entertainment at that.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/media/67945-scoundrel-stars

Comments (5)

Why is it okay for "professional" authors and so-called news organizations to profit from scandals, and not okayfor the people involved in the scandals, like Monica Lewinsky, to cash in as well? God only knows how manymillions of dollars in profits the Clinton scandal generatedfor big media companies and publishers. Keep in mindthat for me the term "scoundrel" applies to people who are guilty of serious crimes, not to people involved insalacious sex scandals.BY Harold Nikiforakis on 11/16/2009 at 16:57
Wow Ron that was whiney. Whiners don't get large advances. Also, putting Lewinsky and Palin in the same column wasn't very skillful as a journalist. Yikes! While people like Sarah Palin are out their living life, I suggest you wipe the self-pitying mucus from your eyes and grow a back bone and write some real stuff.BY JFK-HRC on 11/16/2009 at 18:47
"BlairBY Tony on 11/17/2009 at 09:15
Aw Bill go soak your head.BY poptoy on 11/17/2009 at 12:10
I realize that a lot of people consider the Nixon White House crew to be law breakers and criminal's. God I miss them! They pale by comparison to the So[***]t in Chief and his minions.They actually loved America and were attempting to stop the Liberals from taking the White House. Too bad someone could not have pulled it off in 2008. The end always justifies the means.BY Bill on 11/17/2009 at 13:02

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.