Media

People Need to Make Their Health Deadline a Priority

So many things come to mind in the wake of the passing of the great and gifted Tim Russert. But two are fitting for this column.

First, what a small town our capital city still is, isn’t it? Nearly everyone has a Tim Russert story — about how they met him in a restaurant or at the ballpark, how he remembered your kids’ names and asked about them like he really cared — because he did. He’d show up at my IFE/INFO Policy Roundtables and be the first one there, eager to talk with people, learn what folks were thinking. Tim certainly could call any of the IFE/INFO speakers and get straight through, but he liked listening to the Q and A. He valued that personal interaction, which was a key to his success.
Read More...

Tim Russert: Always a Gentleman

Like millions of other Americans, out of habit I tuned into “Meet the Press” Sunday morning. It’s still hard to believe Tim wasn’t there — and Sunday mornings will never be the same without him.

Tim was, first of all, a great guy. Larger than life, and great fun to be around. He loved life, loved his family, and loved politics.

As famous as he became, Tim never forgot his working-class roots in Buffalo. And he never abandoned his Catholic faith. In fact, Tim came to journalism through politics. And he came to politics through his faith, where he learned politics — and, later, journalism — as the highest form of public service. For him, the Catholic faith was all about helping those less fortunate than we are. I considered it the greatest compliment when he once called me a “Sermon on the Mount Catholic.”
Read More...

Tim Russert

Tim Russert was not just another pretty face.

Let’s face it. He wasn’t really a pretty face.

But he was the best at his craft.

He wasn’t a traditional journalist. He migrated from politics to journalism, so he knew well the field that he covered.

You could always sense that Tim loved politics as much as he loved the country.
Read More...

Cable's Psychosexual Clinton Disorder

Listening to the weird, strange and obsessive discussion about Bill and Hillary Clinton on cable talk shows, one can only conclude that counseling and treatment is required in certain cases, and turning the channel is required in others.

This is not a criticism of the Clintons, it is a criticism of the punditocracy and commentariat classes who have been almost preternaturally wrong in predicting the election, and candidly, don’t have much to say beyond the lunch-talk conventional wisdom of the day.

First, let’s get this straight, Hillary Clinton will not be the vice presidential choice and an entire swath of cable coverage is flat-out wrong, silly and ridiculous. Watching the almost addictive saturation fantasizing about this, which I for one will no longer watch, makes one wonder if this is clinical. It is amazing that close to 90 percent of what runs on cable political news involves a fantasy that will not happen.
Read More...

A More Humble Mr. Williams

Armstrong Williams asks that his current work not be judged by his past, and reminds everyone that his thoughts are his own, not paid for by anyone.

Read More...

The New Media Lingo

The ongoing political campaign has been a boon to the media, especially the cable punditry. One interesting feature of its current coverage is the new lingo I’ve noticed seeping into the commentary. These are some of my favorite clichés.

“Throw him under the bus ...” This one is used by all the commentators in questioning why Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) did not divorce himself sooner from the provocative rhetoric of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Not only should the senator have criticized his former pastor, he should have “thrown him under the bus.” What’s that supposed to mean? A metaphor, no doubt, but surely not what the picture connotes.

“At the end of the day ...” This is how pundits sum up. Not “considering all these points, I conclude ...” or something like that. It is invariably, “At the end of the day ...” Since the political vicissitudes change daily, why use this inapt reference? At the end of the day comes tomorrow.
Read More...

Bev Broadman: A Memorial

The differences between showbiz and newsbiz are small. Anybody with half a brain can tell you that the real stars are the ones no one hears about.

I'm talking about the real brains behind the scenes, the ones we sarcastically call "The Little People.” Of course, they're actually the giants on whose shoulders these performances rest.

One of these people was Beverly Broadman. I say "was” because Bev died this week, consumed by illness.

She leaves us at a relatively early age, but she was not too young to leave behind a remarkable legacy.
Read More...

Carville, Coulter and the Others

In today's media Tower of Babel, the only way to prosper is to get noticed, to be heard above the din. Somehow. It's the very best way to get to the front of TV's Clamoring Class. From there it's a direct link to those coveted (and obscenely lucrative) speaking engagements.

James Carville is a poster boy for this. How better, for instance, to enhance his image as the always-outspoken "Ragin' Cajun" than to compare Bill Richardson to Judas Iscariot?

Richardson certainly infuriated Carville and his fellow Clinton backers by coming out for Barack Obama, but does that warrant a comparison to one of Christianity's supreme villains? Even Carville finally had to admit that was "out of bounds.” Mind you, he didn't apologize. He made light of it. That way he could calm the uproar a bit while keeping the bad-boy image intact and the big buck flying toward that carefully maintained high profile.
Read More...

For Better or For Worse

Armstrong Williams compares Silda Spitzer's situation to that of Hillary Clinton during the Monica Lewinsky scandal.


Read More...

Obama’s Real Experience: His Candidacy

The best evidence of Obama’s readiness to lead the nation is the ability with which he has run for president. After all, what is more difficult, complicated or challenging than getting elected president? What other life experience better illustrates one’s qualification to hold the office than a manifest skill in seeking it? For anyone who has ever been elected president, the race that sent him to the White House was the single most important event in his life and dwarfs any other experience he might have had before running.

As we have watched Obama surmount the hurdles that lay in his path, we cannot help but be impressed with his judgment. Adam Wallinsky, who served on Bobby Kennedy’s staff, once singled out good judgment as JFK’s most salient characteristic. Obama has faced so many delicate questions and issues and seems always to have the right feel for how to handle them.
Read More...

Pages