In my latest column,
“Les GOP Misérables,” I wrote that the GOP obsession with pursuing
losing issues (e.g., cutting Medicare and Social Security) has led to
recent defeats and will lead to more. The right might love it when
Republicans say Obama "does not need the left,” but on Social Security
and Medicare the Democrats and the left win big. Republicans and the
right lose big. This is the ace in the hole for House Minority Leader
Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) during the fiscal-cliff negotiations:
The chessboard is now being arranged in a way in which House Republicans will vote to cut Medicare and Social Security while their Democratic challengers in the next election will not.
Why do you think, dear reader, that Pelosi wrote her recent op-ed regarding Medicare?
My advice to Speaker BoehnerJohn BoehnerLast Congress far from ‘do-nothing’ Top aide: Obama worried about impeachment for Syria actions An anti-government ideologue like Mulvaney shouldn't run OMB MORE would be to accept means-testing for wealthy Medicare recipients in return for accepting tax cuts for the middle class being continued and tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans being ended. And to avoid like the plague asking GOP members to vote for any increase in the Medicare age or for any cut in Social Security benefits or cost-of-living adjustments.
I do not expect my advice to be taken by the GOP. This is Pelosi's ace in the hole. Democratic House challengers in 2014 will clobber GOP House incumbents in 2014 who vote against Medicare and Social Security. This is why I titled my latest column "Les GOP Misérables.”