THE HILL
 

Newt's new pickle

By A.B. Stoddard - 10/27/09 12:55 PM ET

Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R), a 2012 presidential prospect, has stepped into the fray and endorsed the third-party candidate in NY-23, leaving former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) all by his lonesome in the GOP establishment. 

Doug Hoffman, who is running against Democrat Bill Owens and liberal Republican Dede Scozzafava, has now earned the endorsements of Pawlenty, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, former Sen. Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.) and former House Majority Leader Dick Armey (R-Texas). Scozzafava, a State Assemblywoman, supports abortion rights, card-check for unions and same-sex marriage.
The reaction to Gingrich's choice is all you need to know about why Pawlenty — known for his big-tent philosophy and preference for broadening the GOP — didn't want to be left out in the cold by bringing Scozzafava in.

Gingrich's troubles started when he answered a question at a book-signing last week, taped and posted on YouTube by a tea party activist. Gingrich said it is a mistake to support Hoffman when Scozzafava has a better chance of winning the general election and added, "If we give the seat to the Democrats, shame on us."

But the backlash has begun and now well-known voices in the GOP are openly bashing the Newt-ster, according to this story.

An early supporter of the tea party organizers, Gingrich even noted a few months back that a third party could soon break off from the GOP if Republicans didn't apologize for their big-spending ways. He said last week on C-SPAN that he and his wife Callista will consider the landscape in early 2011 and decide to launch a presidential campaign if his country calls on him.

"If there's a requirement as citizens that we run, I suspect we probably will. And if there's not a requirement, if other people have filled the vacuum, I suspect we won't," Gingrich said.

Now that those comments are being mocked by tea partiers and establishment figures alike, it's likely the vacuum will be filled. Watch for Newt's pivot from this very thorny corner.


SHOULD THE WHITE HOUSE BACK UP REID ON THE PUBLIC OPTION, OR STAND BACK IN CASE HE DOESN'T HAVE THE VOTES? Ask A.B. returns Monday, Nov. 2. Please join my weekly video Q&A by sending your questions and comments to This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it . Thank you.


Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/national-party-news/64983-newts-new-pickle

Comments (11)

I can't believe Newt would endorse such a canidate. He's always saying that the conservatives should stick to their principles. This woman is anything but conservative. If Newt did ever run for President, this endor[***]t would haunt him in the South.BY Eric A. on 10/27/2009 at 14:07
And the HALF AKED ALASKAN who is the most unethical and ignorant former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin… STOP Already!! Palin is a flippin Fool and a embarrassment…She has NO legitamacy to support anyone or anything…BY Syrin on 10/27/2009 at 15:11
WOW Syrin, What did they spike your Kool-Aid with?The article isn't about Palin. Why would you spew your hate towards her in an article where she is clearly only mentioned as one of a large crowd who disagree with Newt. Did she shoot your favorite moose or something? I may be wrong, (it's happened once or twice before) but I am going to go out on a limb here and say that I don't think that you would call yourself a Conservative. Likewise, you would not proudly claim the title of Liberal, instead, grasping at the title of "progressive"; hoping to distance yourself publicly from those liberal policies you privately support.BY Joseph on 10/27/2009 at 16:15
Syrin: Prove it. Give us one example of Gov Palin's lack of ethics. Give us one example of Gov Palin's ignorance. Give us one example of Gov Palin's foolishness…and you misspelled legitimacy…and why did you leave the "B" off of baked? When did "baked" become a word that needs to be euphemized?I for one am no longer going to let brainwashed leftists continue to spew falsehoods without demanding you back them up with examples. And not made up examples. They have to be examples that anyone can see for themselves.The fact is you know nothing about this woman and you don't want to know.BY Distant Smoke on 10/27/2009 at 18:25
I was disapointed in Newet suporting her. He should have supported Hoffman!! What happened to his morals?BY Ivanhoereborn on 10/27/2009 at 19:26
Syrin: you sound like a FLAAPL suffering from PDS. Agree very much with Distant Smoke and Joseph - why are you spouting such hatred against Palin? Is your opinion formed from first hand knowledge or the garbage that the main stream media fools have panned? Prove it, indeed!BY Gwen on 10/28/2009 at 03:28
Newt and Morals. Was not Newt the man leading the charge to impeach Clinton for his wholly inappropriate conduct in the White House which lead ultimately to a charge of perjury? Was not this Newt the very same Newt who at this very same time was stepping out on his wife number 2 and getting a bit of action on the side with a then Congressional aid? All of this occurring while he was the Speaker of the House? I believe this is also the very same Newt who when he first ran for the House ran on the slogan "Let Our Family Represent Your Family". He was reportedly stepping out on wife number 1at that time. If one is looking for morals from good ol' Newt, you'd better bring a mighty powerful microscope along so as to identify any trace elements of said morals that may be hanging on by a thread. But, to cut the little fella some slack here, he is after all a Politician, so don't get your hopes up to high for the poor dear. After three decades wallowing in the beltway sewer is it fair to expect too much from the little guy? One thing he does still possess is the lust for power, I really should say power over Us, The People. It is just this desire in the class of permanent political elites that is destroying this once Great Republic. He's a ship without a rudder. Personally, I wouldn't trust him further than I could spit.BY Casual Observer on 10/28/2009 at 09:36
Newt was just keeping in mind the typical effect of third party candidates on races. It's not out of support for Scozzafava or anything: he is simply endorsing what he sees as the best one to beat the Democrat. The Dem is probably going to win now that a whole bunch of inexperienced conservative GOP heads have endorsed someone outside their party. This could very well be emanated throughout the nation in 2010 and 2012…thus handing the Congress back to Pelosi and the White House to Obama.BY Chris W on 10/28/2009 at 12:20
What Newt's endor[***]t of the Scozz indicates is that he is blind and tonedeaf to the views of most Republicans. Get out of the Beltway, Newt, and get reacquainted with mainstream Republicans.BY GregA on 10/28/2009 at 13:42
The republicans are fracturing because most of the policy (that matters) is coming from economic liberals (irony, but historically, low tax, free market economic outlook was called "liberal" - ie, free from gov't). But that can be turned inside out by populist rhetoric, so to get the numbers necessary to win, they have to augment the social conservatives using a lot of "family values"/religion talk. Sure, a lot of folks are both "free market" and pro-life, etc. But you have whole areas of the country that want low taxes and free market but do not care at all about abortion and have no problem with gay marriage. They also tend to support free trade, including free movement of workers across borders, which sends quite a few of the republican "base" up the wall. Someone will forge THAT third party (like the "Libertarian" party, but without all that marijuana!!), and it will be a bigger blow to the old GOP than the Democrats (who will likewise be hurt, but not to the same extent… probably).BY Dave on 10/28/2009 at 20:03

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.