THE HILL
 

NFL: Caveat venditor

By Terence Kane - 10/14/09 11:36 AM ET

In general, the media spends too much time talking about Rush Limbaugh, but the idea that Limbaugh might buy the St. Louis Rams of the NFL is too tempting to resist commenting on, but only because it combines a couple of my favorite topics: sports, economics and politics.
 
The essential question is whether Limbaugh’s propensity for racially and politically insensitive remarks make him unfit to be an owner of an NFL team. On one hand, you can argue that the St. Louis Rams are private property and society should not start conditioning ownership of private property on a person’s legal speech habits. Conversely, you can argue that there is a different standard between a person’s opinions expressed as a political talk radio host and the political opinions expressed as an owner of an NFL franchise. An NFL franchise might not be deserving of public money (though many do), but they often capture a community’s trust, dedication and identity. Granted, it’s not as large a standard as there is between what a talk radio host can say on air and what is permissible for an appellate justice to express in public.


Ultimately, I would argue purchasing an NFL team isn’t like buying 500 Bugatti Veyrons. The other owners in the NFL take a vote on whom they let join their 32-member club. In that vote, the owners will make a judgment whether Limbaugh and his partner are the best ownership bid. NFL owners have a right to consider a potential owner’s public conduct, in addition to the strength of his financial bid.

Several years ago, ESPN hired Limbaugh to be an analyst on its pre-game show, and he made an incredibly stupid remark about Donovan McNabb. The remark wasn’t the most offensive thing I’ve ever heard, but it was so far off the mark that it revealed that Limbaugh relishes in stoking racial discontent. Granting Limbaugh an ownership stake would be an affirmation of his behavior.

One final side note, after watching the excellent documentary “The Band that Wouldn’t Die” about the marching band of the Baltimore Colts that kept going even after Jim Irsay, the self-destructive owner, moved the team to Indianapolis, I think an owner’s commitment to a local community should be an overriding consideration in any bid. Additionally, the film reiterated that NFL franchises aren’t simply a purely private commodity.


The views expressed in this blog do not represent the views or opinions of Generations United.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/sports-a-entertainment/63051-nfl-caveat-venditor

Comments (18)

Without rancor, I have but one comment: Who cares?BY Savant Noir on 10/14/2009 at 13:08
Yes, it's not like the NFL doesn't have a horrible racial history itself. In particular when the year before Limbaugh made his comments the Detroit Lions were fined $200,000 for hiring a WHITE coach. Not one liberal would protest that blatant act of discrimination. Throw in a few criminals, like the recently rehired Michael Vick and the NFL has little room to worry about any standards. http://www.adversity.net/special/rush_limbaugh.htm Remember also that this past summer the NFL levied a fine against the Detroit Lions to the tune of $200,000 for hiring a white coach. The fine was levied because the NFL had previously bowed to the racial special interests and had agreed to interview at least one "person of color" for coaching jobs before making their final selection. Unfortunately, the Detroit Lions had trouble getting any black coaching candidates to agree to an interview because the black coaching candidates all knew that they were to be "window dressing", i.e., not seriously considered for the job, simply in order to satisfy this absurd and facially racist NFL requirement. On his popular EIBN radio talk show Rush Limbaugh had been extremely critical of that particular ra[***]t farce, so he was already on the "hit list" of the racial special interests. (Interestingly, in his earlier criticism of the Detroit Lions farce, Limbaugh pointed out that such moronic racially sensitive policies were bad for black athletes and coaches and he expressed sympathy for the blacks who were forced by such policies to be used as "window dressing". The racial special interests didn't make a peep about that comment.) In that context, today's hysterical reaction of the racial special interests to Rush Limbaugh's innocuous statement on ESPN last Sunday was totally predictable. In this age of political correctness and racial orthodoxy it is not permissible to criticize the race-sensitive double standards which give special preferences or benefits or media treatment to blacks, Hispanics, or Native Americans. Rep. Elijah Cummings and NAACP's Kweise Mfume made that perfectly clear on behalf of their special particular racial interest, which happens to be black folks (and which interest specifically excludes white folks).BY Robert Rosencrans on 10/14/2009 at 13:19
Yeah sure, the owners always care for the community. That's why Art Model moved the Browns out of Cleveland but dares never to return for fear of being stoned. The Dodgers left Brooklyn when I was a kid…I still hate them. But in the grand scheme of things, it is all about money. Don't attach community importance to any pro sports team…like manufacturing goes where the cheap labor is, sports teams will go where the stadium is newer and the payoff is greater. There is no loyalty among thieves.BY Jimmy Knuckles on 10/14/2009 at 13:49
Mr KaneI don't know why anybody would or should care about Rush Limbaugh owning a portion of anything. As a matter of fact why would anybody care what you think.BY Dave Hamlin on 10/14/2009 at 14:13
I am not concerned with what others own…What does upset me though is hypocrisy. I really digress here, but when it comes to ownership, I know this Administration wants us all to own Prius automobiles. Naturally, they have their limo's and jets. They wouldn't be caught dead in a Prius. I had to chuckle as I remember Jerry Brown when he was Governor of California…he wanted to show the world what an energy-conscious guy he was. ON several occasions I woudl see him at Bijan's on Rodeo Drive in Beverly Hills. The always had a photo-op of him standing next to his little Chevy Nova. But, he always arrived in town with 3 limo's (in which he was passenger in one, and the other two were used to haul his clothing purchases away)! Just an amusing story from the archives of my mind!BY Savant Noir on 10/14/2009 at 15:04
Savant, Brown wants to be governor again! I wrote him a email and told him he should have been impeached because he is attorney general of California and did not represent the majority of the people in the man and woman marriage. He represented the [***]. He also doubled welfare after Regan had reduced it by requiring andy one receiving welfare had to work. I told him he has not had a job in the private sector and we do not want him as governor.BY William on 10/14/2009 at 22:36
The NFL has now set the new 'Rush Standard' of how everybody is suppose to act. Now it is time for the NFL to apply this standard to owners, employees, players, supplies and everybody who purchases a ticket or watches on tv.BY Joe on 10/15/2009 at 06:11
Rush Limbaugh, day in and day out, has made millions influencening and shaping minds and hearts toward hatred, divisiveness, racial intolerance and just genuine negativity! He has been a pestulance and cancer on society. He has contibuted mightily toward the culture of uncivility and rudeness! America is changing. America must change toward civility, tolerance, cooperation, all the things Rush Limbaugh is not and does not represent.BY Angellight on 10/15/2009 at 06:49
ANGELLIGHT, I do not know what got under your skin but your ignorance shows right through. The thought that the NFL has standards is a complete joke and to think to that a company can restrict a purchase from a customer due to their ideology is quite wrong. You may not agree with what a person stands for but the last time I checked this was still America for the time being. And for the NFL to have the likes of The RACE BAITER All Sharpten voice in, states VOLUMES.BY MAX on 10/15/2009 at 07:22
Frankly, I can't stand Rush Limbaugh, but that doesn't have anything to do with whether or not he should be allowed to buy into a football franchise. Seems to me it's simply another version of intolerance. I don't think the sports world as a whole has much room to criticize anyone. Beyond that, I don't really care who owns them as long as they don't cost me anything.BY Glennis on 10/15/2009 at 09:02

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.