THE HILL
 

Oprah & exploitation

By Armstrong Williams - 11/13/09 09:38 AM ET

Since appearing on a Nov. 11 taping of “The Oprah Winfrey Show,” Charla Nash’s destroyed face has become an Internet sensation.

Nine months ago, Nash was attacked by a 200-pound chimpanzee. The chimp ripped off her nose, her lips, one thumb and a large part of her scalp. Surgeons had to create a hole in her face so she could drink meals through a straw. In her first interview since the highly publicized attack, Nash appeared on Oprah adorned in a black veil. During the early part of the interview, Nash explained that she wears the veil so as not to scare people away.

Then Oprah went too far. In a move that has the stench of “sweeps” all over it, Oprah prodded Nash to lift the veil and reveal the swollen, scarred remains of her face. In a moment, Nash’s destroyed face was beamed around the world. It did not take long before Nash’s terrible suffering was turned into comic fodder. The New York Daily News observed, "If Charla Nash still had eyes, she too would be horrified."

No one can deny that Oprah is a master of the interview. But this circus-like exploitation of the disfigured is too much. Oprah simply went too far in trotting out Nash’s disfigured face for the gawking edification of America. Nash has already endured enough. Was it really necessary to subject her to yet another indignity?


Williams can be heard daily on Sirius/XM Power 169 from 9 to 10 p.m. EST.

Visit www.armstrongwilliams.com .

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/sports-a-entertainment/67631-oprah-a-exploitation

Comments (5)

That's your misread which you're entitled to. One cannot stop the gwakers given the reach of social media and the immature minds who think Charla's situation is funny. On the positive side, Charla will no doubt go thru multi surgeries and hopefully she will get public support including donations if needed. On that count Oprah provided a public service. Maybe Charla's appearance will bring home the message that we all need to be very careful when deciding which animals make for good house pets.BY Siddan on 11/13/2009 at 09:53
AW — I agree with you 100%. Cold very cold.BY JFK-HRC on 11/13/2009 at 11:05
I don't think it was exploitive at all. The woman wanted to reveal her face on her terms with dignity she chose Oprah as the forum to do it. Oprah humanized her and allowed the world to be desensetized to her face in the process. The sooner we all get used to the disfigured, the easier their lives will be.BY Kez on 11/13/2009 at 12:26
I feel really badly for this woman to have suffered so much and the message about exotic animals is needed. Oprah could have adequately gotten this message out and still left the veil on, makes you wonder if Charla was secondary to Oprah's greed.BY Winfield on 11/13/2009 at 14:11
I'm shocked. Not at her face. Not at Oprah's willingness to provide her with a supportive environment to share it with the world. I'm stunned that someone was actually dumb enough to think this was all an impromptu decision made while the cameras were rolling. That's scarier than any face could ever be.BY Melissa on 11/13/2009 at 17:36

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.