Political decency may triumph despite Trump's DACA decision
© Greg Nash

Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpO’Malley tells Dems not to fear Trump Right way and wrong way Five things to know about the elephant trophies controversy MORE wants you to think of him as a good guy.

Case in point: his decision to end the program which allows 800,000 young adults to remain in this country who were born somewhere else but qualified to stay here temporarily because of the executive order issued by President Obama.

You are supposed to be moved that Trump was so conflicted and pained to make this decision. This is the same person who previously said, "We're going to show great heart. DACA is a very, very difficult subject for me ... You have these incredible kids ... We are going to deal with DACA with heart ... Because you know, I love these kids."

ADVERTISEMENT
If those sentiments weren't enough, how about these remarks proclaimed in a 2011 Fox interview: "You have people in this country for 20 years: They've done a great job, they've done wonderfully, they've gone to school, they've gotten good marks [and] they're productive. Now we're supposed to send them out of the country? I don't believe in that."

 

But obviously, Trump did not remember his own words and allowed Attorney General Jeff SessionsJefferson (Jeff) Beauregard SessionsFederal judge rules Trump defunding sanctuary cities 'unconstitutional on its face' FBI informant gathered years of evidence on Russian push for US nuclear fuel deals, including Uranium One, memos show Alabama election has GOP racing against the clock MORE to do the dirty work and make the announcement and justify the new policy.

Sessions, you might recall, a short time ago was in jeopardy of losing his job. Trump all but invited him to resign. He refused to say he had confidence in him and went out of his way to insult him publicly and question his professional and legal credentials.

But for this function, Trump gladly permitted the "beleaguered" attorney general to have the stage all to himself and bask in the limelight.

Sessions has long been buoyed by his former Senate aide, Stephen Miller. Miller has moved on to being a senior White House policy advisor.

Not enough has been made about Miller, truly a dark and sinister force still remaining in the West Wing. You would think that Chief of Staff John KellyJohn Francis KellyMORE would have purged him from service as he had done with Stephen Bannon and Sebastian Gorka.

If Kelly is genuinely interested in cleaning up the White House and improving its image, Miller should be the next to go.

Back to Sessions. He took no questions after making his announcement.

This is the way he operates. One would think that a pronouncement of this consequence would merit some discussion and edification. No; Sessions prefers to act by fiat.

There is a silver lining in all this controversy and heartache. Seeing Sen. Dick DurbinRichard (Dick) Joseph DurbinQuestions loom over Franken ethics probe GOP defends Trump judicial nominee with no trial experience Democrats scramble to contain Franken fallout  MORE (D-Ill.) and Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamAlabama election has GOP racing against the clock Graham on Moore: 'We are about to give away a seat' key to Trump's agenda Tax plans show Congress putting donors over voters MORE (R-S.C.) holding a press conference and striving to find a "bipartisan" solution was a refreshing and welcoming development.

Graham's words were particularly meaningful and poignant: "From a Republican Party point of view, this is a defining moment. You have a chance to show the nation, as the president of all of us, where your heart's at."

Furthermore, there are House Republicans who seem to sincerely believe a solution can be found and an actual bill can be passed.

Leading moderate Rep. Charlie Dent (R-Pa.) hopefully said, "I believe the votes are there to pass some kind of DACA program in the House."

Better yet, the House leadership seems to share this optimistic vision. The No. 3 Republican in the House, Rep. Cathy McMorris RodgersCathy McMorris RodgersOvernight Finance: Trump calls for ObamaCare mandate repeal, cuts to top tax rate | Trump to visit Capitol Hill in tax reform push | CBO can't do full score before vote | Bipartisan Senate bill would ease Dodd-Frank rules Overnight Regulation: Bipartisan Senate bill would curb Dodd-Frank rules | Opioid testing rule for transport workers finalized | Google faces state antitrust probe | Dems want investigation into FCC chief Trump to visit Capitol Hill amid tax-reform push MORE of Washington said, "Congress must protect the Dreamers who are currently shielded from deportation."

She concluded by passionately stating, "The principle is fundamental for me."

All the years of strife, ugly words and bitter recriminations can come to an end. The most heartening words came from the one person who can actually bring up the issue for a vote and influence the outcome, Speaker of the House Paul RyanPaul Davis RyanDem: Ex-lawmaker tried to pin me to elevator door and kiss me Two months later: Puerto Rico doesn’t have power, education or economy running again On Capitol Hill, few name names on sexual harassment MORE.

On Tuesday he publicly called for consensus and provided a practical and moral justification for acting in the public good. He said, "that those who have done nothing wrong can still contribute as a valued part of this great country."

Maybe the final act for this epic struggle can conclude on a high and humane note. House and Senate Republicans who have the power of the majority can finally do something right. When they do just that, they will denounce the duplicity of Trump and the smallness of Sessions.

Mark Plotkin is a contributor to the BBC on American politics and a columnist for The Georgetowner. Previously, he was the political analyst for WAMU-FM, Washington’s NPR affiliate, where he co-hosted the “D.C. Politics Hour With Mark Plotkin.” He later became the political analyst for WTOP-FM, Washington’s all-news radio station, where he hosted “The Politics Hour With Mark Plotkin.” He is a winner of the Edward R. Murrow Award for excellence in writing.


The views expressed by contributors are their own and are not the views of The Hill.