THE HILL
 

Going out of their way to irritate women

By John Feehery - 11/19/09 11:09 AM ET

It was bad enough that he beat the most viable female presidential candidate in our nation’s history. Now it seems the president is going out of his way to irritate the fairer sex in our nation.

Most men like me already distrusted Barack Obama. It is no shock to anyone that white men voted overwhelmingly against candidate Obama in the last election, while women voted overwhelmingly for him.

What is shocking is seeing how the Obama Democrats are now seemingly going out of their way to irritate working women, and especially working mothers.

How do I count the ways?

Well, there was the screw-up on swine flu vaccinations. They told mothers that they had to get their kids immunized. And then they failed to produce enough of the vaccine to meet the demand that they themselves created. That is pretty irritating on a very personal level.

They then allowed the healthcare thing to get completely screwed up with an unnecessary abortion fight. (Unnecessary, because there is no reason why the federal government should be taking over the entire healthcare system.) That alienated the president’s most passionate supporters, pro-choice women.

Then they allowed a panel that they picked to completely muddy the waters on mammograms. Should women check for breast cancer? Should they not? Are you kidding me? Of course they should check to see if they have breast cancer. On a macro-level, it might make sense to have fewer people in to see their doctor if they feel a lump in their breast. It leads to lower costs. But on a very personal level, it is a completely stupid decision not to check. And most women (and most men, for that matter) make these decisions through the prism of their own personal experiences. The Obama administration opened themselves up to the charge that they were promoting the first step to healthcare rationing.

And now the president’s team is targeting cosmetic surgery and other cosmetic improvements for a special tax. My wife calls it the Bo-Tax, because it will make botox more expensive. You want to really make the ladies angry? Tell them they have to pay the government a special tax if they want to look more beautiful through the wonders of cosmetic surgery.

I am a guy, and sometimes I unintentionally irritate my wife, and sometimes I do it on purpose. It never turns out particularly well for me when I do it on purpose.

The president might be in the doghouse with female voters for a long time after these tone-deaf decisions.


Visit www.thefeeherytheory.com.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/the-administration/68601-going-out-of-their-way-to-irritate-women

Comments (7)

I wonder if Mic[***]e Obama would say, "heck, if that distinguished panel recommends not doing mammogram until I am 50, I'll certainly skip it and save some Government plan some money". Or, is this "recommendation" for the rest of American working women? Welcome to rationing, ladies.BY Bzdashek on 11/19/2009 at 12:38
"Most men like me already distrusted Barack Obama."?CNN exit poll from the 2008 Presidential election, for males: Obama 49, McCain 48"It is no shock to anyone that white men voted overwhelmingly against candidate Obama in the last election"Oh, right - only *white* men matter."There is no reason why the federal government should be taking over the entire healthcare system."Common right-wing lie that anyone wants to "take-over" the health care system; creating a new insurance option won't take over the healthcare system anymore than Medicare or the VA did."Then they allowed a panel that they picked to completely muddy the waters on mammograms. Should women check for breast cancer? Should they not? "Um, they changed the recommendation from every year starting at 40 to every year starting at 50, and they never said you shouldn't get one. What is "muddy" about that? Oh, right: the author needed to portray the government as dangerous."And now the president’s team is targeting cosmetic surgery and other cosmetic improvements for a special tax." Because low taxes on luxury items is a plank in the GOP fiscal responsibility platform (after they spent us into a hole for 14 years).BY torrentprime on 11/19/2009 at 13:07
Read BZ, above Read again.BY Reality Check on 11/19/2009 at 13:12
You infidels may not understand this, but someone with 72 virgins on his hand has to think long-term. In no time all of them reach 40 years of age and how would their master afford these costly procedures every year times 72? Add to their upkeep the cost of pap smears and getting 72 virgins no longer looks attractive for heroic warriors. That is why American Government looks for people interests. Thank you. Mister President Obama.BY Adbul Nasral on 11/19/2009 at 13:15
What BS this author spews…These may be democrats but OBAMA DID NOT WRITE THIS INTO THE BILL…Stupidpa k wrote this and the ole blue pill takers passed it …Betrayal and treason by the legislators who wrote it NOT OBAMA!BS BS BSBY Docb on 11/19/2009 at 13:34
As a woman I would prefer my breasts to be handled by a private physician rather than a dumb Government clerk.BY Pizda on 11/19/2009 at 16:48
I wonder how much in back Bo-taxes Pelosi would owe if that were to become law? This is whole charade is frightening simply because democrats are [***] bent on passing this stuff no matter if it is well written or not. They are convinced that if they pass these legislative measures that suddenly everyone will like them again. Unfortunately once entitlement legislation is passed it becomes exceedingly difficult to repeal.BY Winfield  on 11/20/2009 at 17:01

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.