THE HILL
 

Professional incompetence and the making of a terrorist

By Charlie Law - 11/20/09 01:35 PM ET

As with most things, the path that led Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan to allegedly stage an attack on his fellow servicemen and -women at Fort Hood was complex. No doubt his minority status had something to do with it, although an awful lot of adherents of minority religions get along just fine in the U.S. military. Heck, these days, anybody who professes any religious belief at all is going to find himself a target for somebody's criticism. Still, it's highly plausible that a practicing Muslim in the post-9/11 military would run up against more than his share.

Beyond all this identity stuff, however, it looks as if Hasan had a clear history of professional incompetence, at least according to a memo from a supervisor at Walter Reed Army Hospital.

You have to wonder how much of Hasan's twisted perspective came from professional resentment and plain old insecurity. If so, shouldn't we hold as partly accountable those who passed him along through his psychiatric training and beyond?

If the professional criticism is warranted, this guy was already very likely doing serious damage to his patients without even leaving his office. Fortunately, he seems to have seen far fewer patients than most of his peers — only 10 percent of the norm when he worked at Walter Reed, according to sources contacted there by National Public Radio.

It's easy to imagine someone with minimal proficiency in his profession shifting blame for his incompetence to the system that employs him. And how much easier on his own psyche — and nobler-seeming, all around — to claim that his failure to garner professional approval was due to his religious beliefs.

Fill this vacuum with the approval, from some extremist quarters, that he presumably hoped to gain by the atrocities he is said to have committed, and you've got a pretty good recipe for a violent outburst.

The long and short of it is that anything that motivates a human being to do what Hasan purportedly did is going to be complicated. The vast majority of Arab-Americans and American Muslims are quick to acknowledge their gratitude to a society that, while far from perfect, has offered them an equal shot at life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Let's not write off the tragic case of Nidal Hasan as Y.A.M.T. (Yet Another Muslim Terrorist).

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/the-military/68885-professional-incompetence-and-the-making-of-a-terrorist

Comments (12)

CHARLES: A few things that came out about the Hasan investigation have not been explained as yet. (1) - The medication found in his room included pills for bronchitis and HIV. I heard he was scheduled for an HIV screening test prior to leaving for Iraq. Was he a drug adict or homosexual and was trying to cover that up? (2) They also found the professional business cards indicating he was a MD Psychiatrist, along with religious lettering on the card. This individual was obviously leading a double life. Did he have his own private practice on the side? Was he a spy for the enemy? Could he have been trying to recruit others to join the military? What was he doing when he was not seeing his fair share of patients on the military base?BY JFK-HRC on 11/20/2009 at 14:21
I haven't heard anyone mention the fact that this man, who was a muslim, was counseling soldiers who had been in Iraq and Afghanistan, who probably had killed innocent people there. If he had to hear the bloody details of children being murdered, of women being raped in front of their families, and other atrocities, maybe that's why he didn't show up for those sessions. It may be that some of these soldiers bragged about their actions, knowing that it would bother him. All facts of this case must come out, if we want to know the truth of why he did what he did.BY Regina Carpenter on 11/21/2009 at 17:51
The Miltiary 'hierarchy' is so absurd; if Hasan was a known gay guy, he would have been thrown out just for that. Think about that, everybody.BY Joyce M on 11/21/2009 at 19:24
The kind of people who become terrorists are losers in every nation. People who are failures in what they are doing who seek some external purpose to infuse a sense of importance by attacking the innocent. PatheticBY student1776 on 11/21/2009 at 19:51
This is ridiculous. If Mr Law understood how 'health care professionals' are trained, he would realize what a gargantuan task it would be to hold responsible those institutions that are responsible for passing along - even shielding - incompetents.You can prove fraud and bias, but superiors only smirk at you, hide records, give you the runaround… We've a huge number of incompetents, frauds, etc., in every field - but you rarely hear about more than an occasional isolated case. See what is required to bring even one case to the public?BY Jack Mack on 11/21/2009 at 20:45
For hundreds of years history and medical texts have referrred to the Forth Hood massacre as "amok." as in running amok. Dictionary.com has a deft and accurate definition of amok. There is no motive in an amok, but a variant of mania in which the perpertator kills as many people in as short a time as possible, as in battle.BY Scholar on 11/21/2009 at 23:29
Why isnt this being labeled a terrorist attack? Is it possible people will start saying [***] Cheney was right?BY Roger on 11/22/2009 at 10:51
To Jack Mack: There are lapses in all fields, and I'm sure medicine is no exception, despite the high stakes. Still, I don't believe what you describe is true across the board. Last week a physician friend on staff at a teaching hospital spent a week as part of a team of nine interviewing 135 applicants for two ENT residency positions. I gathered from talking to him the interviewers were taking their job pretty seriously.BY Charlie Law on 11/22/2009 at 13:31
Charlie Law. "what Hasan purportedly did is going to be complicated". Trust me, he did it. Let loose of the "Law" part of it. That we are even having this conversation is pathetic. The fact that he has not already been "strung up" or "spattered against a wall" shows what we have become; a people more interested in the "rights" of the wrong than the "wrong" of the wrong. It isn't worth 10 minutes of our time, let alone the 10's of millions of dollars which will be spent ensuring his "rights" are upheld. And if you think that all the "learned experts" are going to come up with one iota of information we don't already know relating to why he did what he did, you are nuts. The signs were there for many to see for years. His incompetence was the least of it. See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil in the name of political correctness, two words you avoid using in your epistle. As a doctor, retired military officer and freedom loving American, you can see I for one have had my fill of it. The cauldron in boiling.BY J Edgar Swoop on 11/22/2009 at 22:52
What needs to be determined is whether or not Hasan had a hidden agenda. Or gradually developed one. I guess since he has been charged with pre-meditated murder that the investigators must believe he did. I believe too much was overlooked in his case. Another example of someone or someones dropping the ball but it never pays to fingerpoint after such a tragedy. Just determine what needs to be done to prevent another occurence.BY fedupinny on 11/23/2009 at 01:21

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.