feed-image Pundits Blog - The Hill's Pundits Blog Feed »
  May 3, 2007, 6:12 am

Lying low, for now

By Peter Fenn
What is all this political hand-wringing over the Iraq votes?  How many votes for an override, the differences between the liberal Democrats and the blue dogs, are Democrats over-reaching?

The Democrats are not only doing the right thing pushing back against the Bush administration but the Republicans are quaking in their boots every time they have to cast another vote for Bush’s Iraq policy.

Here’s my guess. Many Republicans feel that they have until early fall to keep their powder dry and lie low. They raise some questions in their public comments but basically toe the Bush line on the votes. If there is not a dramatic turnaround in Iraq soon they know that there is no Plan B. They know that the politics of Iraq, if it rolls into 2008, will be a disaster for Republicans. They know that this war has no light at the end of the tunnel, only more devastation and disaster. They also know that things are unraveling in Afghanistan with more and more civilians getting caught in the crossfire and increasing concern about U.S. troop presence and action on the ground. Read more...
Archived under: Foreign Policy
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
  May 3, 2007, 4:16 am

Tonight: The 10 White Men

By A.B. Stoddard
Tonight at the Reagan Library the GOP presidential candidates, known as the 10 White Men, all hope they will have a chance to break away from the pack. We are sure to hear much gushing about their hero, Ronald Reagan, and some awkward statements about the current Republican president, George W. Bush. But to make an impact the candidates clearly need to talk about themselves, and  to do a good job of it.

This task is hardest for Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) who has built his career as a politician defined by his independence — that is, until recent years, when he has become defined by his contradictions. All eyes are on him tonight as the former frontrunner fighting to regain his momentum. To win, candidate McCain must become someone beyond the guy who infuriated conservatives and opposed Bush, then the guy who embraced conservatives and Bush. Read more...
Archived under: Presidential Campaign
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
  May 3, 2007, 4:14 am

Thoughts on Tonight's Debate

By Karen Hanretty
A couple quick thoughts this morning before tonight's GOP presidential debate in Southern California at the Ronald Reagan Library:

1.    Intensity, intensity, intensity. It ain't there. If the GOP doesn't fall in love with their eventual nominee by next year, they aren't going to turn out to vote. And that, of course, could have a ripple effect throughout the country in state and local races. I think part of the angst is that Republicans aren't sure what they would get by voting for any of the top three candidates. Would McCain be a good capitalist in the White House? Not sure. Would Romney be as eager to veto socially liberal bills as he says he would spending bills? Maybe. Would Rudy go a tad too far in wire-tapping every citizen for the sake of the greater good?  Who knows. Read more...
Archived under: Presidential Campaign
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
  May 2, 2007, 1:45 pm

House Override Vote Means Issue Not a Clear Winner for Democrats

By John Feehery
It was a very close vote in the House. Not in the sense that the president’s veto was close to being overridden; rather in the sense that House Democrats are not really sure this is a winning issue for them.

Seven House Democrats abandoned their leadership and voted to sustain the president’s veto, while only two Republicans abandoned their president.

All the passion on this issue is coming from the crazy left, who dominate the primary process for House Democrats. Yet seven thought it was worth the risk of alienating their base and possibly inspiring a primary fight to vote with the president. Read more...
Archived under: Foreign Policy
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
  May 2, 2007, 1:43 pm

Stephanie Miller Wows 'Em On MSNBC

By Brent Budowsky
Progressive radio talk show host Stephanie Miller is doing a great job in the old Imus spot on MSNBC, and I hope everyone has a chance to catch her show.

Stephanie is a comedienne, radio host and progressive impressario, and it's great to see her doing cable television.

She's funny, pointed, provocative, progressive and her time on MSNBC is a mini-breakthrough and I suspect we'll be seeing more of her. Read more...
Archived under: Media
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
  May 2, 2007, 11:56 am

Missed Opportunity for Obama

By A.B. Stoddard
Barack, Barack, Barack. What is it going to take for this guy to take a gimme?

According to a story in our paper yesterday by Alexander Bolton, Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) was asked a year ago by the Congressional Black Caucus to do a fundraiser for the CBC political action committee and still hasn't found the time.

Has Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) found the time? You betcha. Why would
she pass up the chance to help? And Bill Clinton has found the time to lend a hand as well — no surprise there — with plans to chair a charity golf and tennis tournament organized by the spouses of Black Caucus members. Read more...
Archived under: Presidential Campaign
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
  May 2, 2007, 8:30 am

Bridge on the River Kwai

By John Feehery
In the Academy Award-winning movie “Bridge on the River Kwai,” British Lt. Col. Nicholson (played by Alec Guinness) becomes so enamored of his project of building the bridge, which will help his enemy in the long run, he actually attempts to stop efforts to blow it up by his fellow allies. That is called losing the proper focus.

House Republicans may be accused of pulling a “Nicholson” if they cooperate too much in finding a solution to the war-funding crisis. House Minority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), in particular, has proposed some steps to bridge the gap between the White House and congressional Democrats.

But unlike Nicholson, Blunt is actually serving a bigger purpose than just building a bridge. He and his House Republican colleagues may actually save the reputation of congressional Republicans and the Republican Party. Read more...
Archived under: Foreign Policy
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
  May 2, 2007, 8:10 am

The Foxification of America

By Bill Press
He already owns the Fox Network, the Fox News Channel, the New York Post, the Weekly Standard, Sky News, and 20th Century Fox movie studios. And he’s starting a new Fox Business Channel. But that’s not enough. Now he wants to buy the Wall Street Journal.

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the United States of Murdoch! Yes, right-wing media mogul Rupert Murdoch has made a $5 billion offer to buy Dow Jones, parent company of the Journal.

Make no mistake about it, the FCC should not allow this deal to go through. Because it’s bad news for America. Read more...
Archived under: Media
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
  May 2, 2007, 8:07 am

There You Go Again, Karen Hanretty

By Brent Budowsky
Karen, having the taken the opportunity to quote my favorite Reagan line, you missed my point, reiterated here.

I was not particulary bothered and did not mention the death penalty issue or the comparison between Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) on the matter.

What I did respond to was, first, the incorrect suggestion that there was some major booing of Hillary at the San Diego meeting, which did not happen, and, second, the portrayal of those who opposed the war policy as "lefty bloggers" or "granola caucus" or "peaceniks." Read more...
Archived under: Presidential Campaign
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
  May 2, 2007, 4:11 am

Rethinking Bush in Iraq

By Armstrong Williams
The president held to his principles and vetoed the $124 billion emergency war spending measure that would have required him to begin withdrawing troops as early as July. I had joined the chorus of criticism of this administration, but seeing the president’s defense of his action during his press conference has caused me to reconsider.

There is no question that the casualties are incalculable from this Iraq conflict and war against terror. We’re not talking only about thousands of dead bodies, but also Bush’s credibility, Dick Cheney’s abysmal approval rating, the loss of both chambers in Congress and the possibility of annihilation in the ’08 congressional and presidential elections. The president’s secretary of state, along with key aides, have suffered severe credibility loss over what is perceived as the president’s blindness and stubbornness.

It’s easy to believe that we know everything about this war based on rumor, publication of books and public declarations; realistically, however, we’ve been shown very little. That which we’ve seen is not enough to dismiss the threats against us and the true reason why this administration is unwavering with Iraq: It believes it’s a matter of existence and nonexistence, life and death. Read more...
Archived under: Foreign Policy
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
« Start< Prev771772773774775776777778779780Next >End »
VISIT THE HILL'S HOMEPAGE FOR THE LATEST ON CONGRESS ››
 

More Videos »

Pundits Blog Twitter - Click to follow
More From The Web
bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire (Energy) »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »

More Healthwatch »

More Floor Action »

More Transportation »

More DEFCON Hill »

More Global Affairs »

More In The Know »

More RegWatch »

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.