|
|
|
March 13, 2007, 9:51 am
By
Bill Press
If I heard it once, I heard it a hundred times. Every time I warned that new, unlimited police powers under the Patriot Act could be used by the FBI against law-abiding citizens, some conservative know-nothing would insist, “Oh, no. The FBI would never do anything like that!”
Oh, yeah? Well, now we know: The FBI could, and would, and did.
Thanks to a report by the Justice Department’s own inspector general, we now know the FBI used “national security letters,” under the Patriot Act, without a court order -- and without any evidence of links to terrorists -- to obtain phone, bank, and credit card records of thousands of innocent Americans.
Read more...
Archived under:
Civil Rights, Homeland Security
|
|
|
March 13, 2007, 8:54 am
By
A.B. Stoddard
Yes, Republicans are enjoying surprising unity in vexing the Democrats on war policy. But what could surprise them more than seeing the editorial boards of the Los Angeles Times and The Washington Post agree with them?
WARNING: The words below were not written by a House GOP Conference press staffer.
Yes, the L.A. Times yesterday called the Democrats' war-funding blueprint an unruly mess of bad policy and bad precedent that Bush should veto.
Read more...
Archived under:
Foreign Policy
|
March 13, 2007, 7:10 am
By
Brent Budowsky
The most underestimated statistic in American politics is that 21 Republican senators are running for reelection in 2008, creating the possibility of seismic gains for Democrats.
Is Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) a brilliant tactician leading his caucus to a catastrophic disaster in 2008?
Consider the perspective of Dick Morris. In his analysis, the Iraq war votes are a game of chicken in which Republicans aggressively go to the mat for the president's policy, and prevail because of their iron will.
Setting aside whether the lives of our troops should be subject to a game of chicken by partisans in Washington, in a war that is going poorly, with tidal opposition from the American people, this strategy at best achieves irrelevant short-term tactical gains in return for strategic disaster for the GOP.
Read more...
Archived under:
Campaign, Foreign Policy
|
March 13, 2007, 6:45 am
By
John Feehery
The Republican brand has taken a beating, especially among younger Americans. The war is one reason, but there are others, especially global warming. The irony, of course, is that only the Republicans have been taking seriously the ticking time-bomb that is run-away entitlement spending. When college kids get ready to ready to retire, Social Security and Medicare spending will take about 90 percent of the budget, or some crazy number like that. But most kids don’t worry about that now. They worry about other things, like war and global warming.
Read more...
Archived under:
Campaign
|
March 13, 2007, 6:34 am
By
Peter Fenn
The president has three choices on the pardon of Scooter Libby. He can pardon him now, get it over with and take the political flak. (And save the Libby donors to his legal defense fund millions for additional appeals.) Second, he can wait until all the appeals are over, presumably after the 2008 elections, and lump Libby in with his other pardons. This would save the 2008 Republican presidential candidates a heck of a lot of grief. The third option, of course, is to let the legal process take its course and not pardon him at all.
Read more...
Archived under:
Campaign, Lawmaker News
|
March 12, 2007, 12:39 pm
By
Brent Budowsky
The major media is missing the full magnitude of the grassroots Republican surge that will soon transform the 2008 field.
The remnants of the Bush presidency and recent Republican Congress is a crisis of conservatism with a major backlash brewing beneath the surface. None of the Big Three (McCain, Romney, or Guiliani) has won the confidence of authentic conservatives. The boomlet for Fred Thompson will grow and challenge the conventional wisdom, again.
Read more...
Archived under:
Campaign
|
March 12, 2007, 12:26 pm
By
John Feehery
What is a conservative? While the conservative brand has taken a beating over the last several months with many independent voters, being a conservative is still essential for winning the Republican nomination for president.
But what kind of conservative? That remains the most difficult point of contention as the Republican primary process commences and as Hill Republicans seek to gain their voice and their footing in a Democrat-dominated Congress.
Read more...
Archived under:
Campaign
|
March 12, 2007, 6:39 am
By
Armstrong Williams
As the Democratic 2008 presidential campaign moves forward, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, competitors for the Democratic presidential nomination, claim to be legends of the civil rights movement benefiting from the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Yet neither was there when white police beat black Alabamans 42 years ago. Obama was born in 1961 and the confrontation at Selma took place in 1965. Hillary, on the other hand, was born in 1947 and had the advantage of being involved with the civil rights movement. But in 1964, a year after Martin Luther King’s famous address at the Lincoln Memorial, she was a 17-year-old class president at Main East High School in the Chicago suburbs describing herself as “an active Young Republican” and “a Goldwater girl, right down to my cowboy outfit.”
Read more...
Archived under:
Campaign, Civil Rights
|
March 12, 2007, 4:25 am
By
A.B. Stoddard
The story of seven U.S. attorneys being fired abruptly and together failed to register with Official Washington when it happened on Dec. 7. Minds were focused on critical power shifts taking place — in Congress, where Democrats took over after 12 years of GOP rule, and at the Pentagon, where Robert Gates got to pick up the pieces, and the war in Iraq, from former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.
But the latest in what is now a huge story is an acknowledgment yesterday from the White House that President Bush's top adviser — yes, that would be Karl Rove — has played a role.
Read more...
Archived under:
Lawmaker News
|
|
March 9, 2007, 11:06 am
By
A.B. Stoddard
As the House leadership searches for a principled yet politically practical course on funding the war in Iraq, it appears that Republicans are unified and resolved but Democrats are mired in turbulent and burgeoning disarray. Republicans in the House wear wide smiles when asked about their success thus far in staying united, while two months into power the Democrats continue to divide. If the supplemental spending bill for the Iraq war isn't "clean" and is loaded with the dates certain or Democrats' conditions, they can vote against it, they claim, because they have been consistent with the American people about protecting the troops.
The liberals are squirming and want hard deadlines. The conservatives are warning they can't sign on to anything that appears to micromanage the war or compromise the troops. This is more than a headache for Democratic leaders in the House and Senate. But a close ally of Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.)reminded me of the big picture yesterday. Sure, Democrats are scrambling now, split and struggling to get enough numbers to pass their bill. But, the ally said, the legislative sausage-making on Iraq won't be under the microscope in 2008 — the Republicans' unity and refusal to buck President Bush will be.
It may feel good for Republicans now, but if they put off joining the Democrats in a solution, they could soon find themselves in another election just like 2006.
Archived under:
Uncategorized
|
|
VISIT THE HILL'S HOMEPAGE FOR THE LATEST ON CONGRESS ››
|
|
Pundits Blog Most Popular Stories
|
|
Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.
|