

Coburn pushes back on union criticism over FAA funding showdown
In his standoff with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) over a bill to fund highway and aviation programs last week, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) was never trying to shut down the agencies, a spokesman told The Hill on Tuesday.
Instead, Coburn was trying to stop Reid from tying the funding for the Federal Aviation Administration to road-beautification projects, Coburn spokesman John Hart said.
“I don’t think the [Communication Workers of America] understands [Senator] Coburn’s position,” Hart said in an email to The Hill. “[Senator] Coburn was never threatening to ‘shutdown’ the FAA. He was objecting to Majority Leader Reid’s decision to hold FAA hostage to the transportation enhancement program. What’s extreme, in our view, is linking funding for squirrel sanctuaries to the FAA bill. The CWA may want to do a little more homework next time.”
“If Republican colleagues successfully pressured Tom Coburn … why won’t they do the same to Rep. John Mica [R-Fla.] and his extreme, union-busting views that led to the last FAA shutdown?” CWA spokeswoman Candice Johnson said Monday in a news release.
The fight between the union and Coburn and Mica highlights what has become an ideological battle over the normally routine matter of the FAA’s funding. Mostly because of labor disputes, lawmakers have approved 22 short-term extensions of the FAA bill, and a long-term bill appears out of reach, though it has been passed in different forms by both the House and Senate.
The House approved a four-year, $59 billion bill for the FAA, which in addition to being longer and less expensive per year than the two-year, $34 billion bill the Senate passed, includes an effort to make it harder for transportation workers to unionize that drew a veto threat from President Obama.
Coburn eventually agreed to drop his opposition to a short-term extension before a deadline of last Friday in exchange for votes on separate amendments that addressed his issues. The amendments failed, and the larger bill was approved on a 92-6 vote.








