The Hill
Sunday, July 05, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room Blog
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Cheri Jacobus
John Del Cecato
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Announcements
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Aerospace
Energy Special Report
Telecom Special Report
Transport Special Report
Earth Day Special Report
Consumer Safety Report
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Business & Lobbying arrow Farm worker groups sue EPA to stop pesticide use
Business & Lobbying PDF Print E-mail
Farm worker groups sue EPA to stop pesticide use
Posted: 08/01/07 08:43 PM [ET]
Having failed to add new pesticide controls to a House farm bill, farm worker and environmental groups are trying the courts to block what they say is a particularly hazardous chemical now used on a variety of crops.

EarthJustice, Farmworker Justice, United Farm Workers of America and the Natural Resources Defense Council argue in a lawsuit that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is violating the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act by allowing the use of chlorpyrifos on farm fields.

The suit was filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

A neurotoxin, chlorpyrifos is banned from indoor use. Acute symptoms include headache, nausea and diarrhea. Exposure to chlorpyrifos in the womb can damage a fetus’s intellectual development.

“It was designed to affect the nervous system of insects, but it affects the nervous system of humans just as badly,” said Dr. Routt Reigart, a professor of pediatrics at the Medical University of South Carolina. Reigart was part of a press conference yesterday discussing the lawsuit.

An EPA fact sheet dated February 2002 states: “provided that risk mitigation measures are adopted, chlorpyrifos fits into its own ‘risk cup’ — [its] individual risks are within acceptable levels.”

The groups involved with the lawsuit also were backing several provisions included in a farm bill authored by Reps. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) and Ron Kind (D-Wis.) that was offered as a substitute to the farm bill written by the House Agriculture Committee.

The debate over the two rival bills centered on how each treated payments to farmers. Another difference was that the Flake-Kind bill would have also required more complete reporting of pesticide use in agriculture. It would also have provided money to help growers use safer methods to raise crops.

Chlorpyrifos is used on a variety of crops including, corn, cotton, wheat, oranges and apples.

The House approved the committee’s version of the farm bill. Backers of the pesticide provisions still hope they are included in the Senate version of the measure.

The EPA found that the pesticide residues in food or drinking water “do not pose risk concerns.”

Shelley Davis, deputy director of Farmworker Justice, said that “by refusing to ban agricultural use of this toxic pesticide, EPA is saying the health of farm workers and rural children doesn’t matter.”

 
 
 
BLOGS
TheHill.com Blogs Briefing Room Pundits Room Congress Blog Twitter Room
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.