The Hill
Monday, July 06, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room Blog
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Cheri Jacobus
John Del Cecato
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Announcements
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Aerospace
Energy Special Report
Telecom Special Report
Transport Special Report
Earth Day Special Report
Consumer Safety Report
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Business & Lobbying arrow K Street taking a hit from Freddie, Fannie takeovers
Business & Lobbying PDF Print E-mail
K Street taking a hit from Freddie, Fannie takeovers
Posted: 09/29/08 06:35 PM [ET]

At least a half-dozen lobbying firms that worked for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have filed termination forms with the Senate Office of Public Records over the last two weeks.

The two giant mortgage companies have cut long ties with some of K Street’s biggest names, including firms well-connected to both the Democratic and Republican parties.

The wave of contract terminations is not surprising. When the two companies were taken over by the government, they said they would end lobbying practices that had made them a powerful force in Washington.

Still, the lost contracts could hit K Street hard.

Overall, 37 outside firms filed second-quarter reports for Fannie and Freddie, according to Senate records.

“If your client is in trouble, that’s good for business. They go out of business? Not so much,” said one consultant who has worked with Freddie Mac.

Fannie’s and Freddie’s largesse among political circles was mammoth, even by Washington standards.

The Center for Responsive Politics, a campaign finance watchdog group, estimates that the two housing giants spent nearly $200 million on lobbying and political contributions over the past two decades. Last year alone, Fannie spent $5.6 million on lobbying while Freddie spent $8.5 million.

“With Fannie and Freddie going down, dozens of lobbyists are now out … it ain’t good,” said the consultant, who added that other firms damaged by the mortgage crisis could also cut down on their lobbying expenses.

Observers suspect other financial services firms that have taken on government assistance because of the Wall Street crisis, such as American International Group, might also drop their K Street business.

“When you see other companies under stress, it is an unpredictable bounce to the football. You don’t know which way it is going,” said the consultant. “It could metastasize into many of the other in-house lobbying shops going down.”

Among those who have ended their agreements with Fannie are Ricchetti Inc., headed up by Steve Ricchetti, a former deputy chief of staff to President Bill Clinton and fundraiser for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s (D-N.Y.) presidential run; Fierce, Isakowitz & Blalock, with Kirk Blalock, former deputy special assistant to President Bush, as name partner; and Cauthen Forbes & Williams, which includes Jeff Forbes, a past staff director for the Senate Finance Committee.

A Fannie Mae spokeswoman declined to comment.

So far, only Arnold & Porter has filed termination forms for Freddie. Dwight Fettig, once legislative director to Sen. Tim Johnson (D-S.D.), worked on that contract.

But more could be on the way.


 
 
 
BLOGS
TheHill.com Blogs Briefing Room Pundits Room Congress Blog Twitter Room
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.