The Hill
Monday, July 06, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room Blog
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Cheri Jacobus
John Del Cecato
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Announcements
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Aerospace
Energy Special Report
Telecom Special Report
Transport Special Report
Earth Day Special Report
Consumer Safety Report
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Business & Lobbying arrow Major restructuring looming for top Army program
Business & Lobbying PDF Print E-mail
Major restructuring looming for top Army program
Posted: 01/10/09 11:15 AM [ET]

The Army is planning to drastically reduce its ambitious modernization program, known as Future Combat Systems, according to congressional, industry and Pentagon sources.

Army Chief of Staff George Casey was expected to meet with four- and three-star Army generals on Saturday to discuss plans for restructuring. Army officials are expected to have several other meetings over the next few weeks.

The Future Combat Systems (FCS) is designed to make the Army lighter and more agile through an intricate web of manned and unmanned ground and aerial vehicles all linked together by a digital network. At a price tag of at least $160 billion, it is the Army’s most expensive weapons program ever.

Boeing and Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC) are the main contractors for FCS with the task of integrating the various technologies and managing scores of subcontractors.

Details on the restructuring plan are scant and closely held, but sources told The Hill that the plan includes cutting out four of the eight manned vehicles that were initially supposed to be developed.

The two contractors working on the manned vehicles are General Dynamics and BAE Systems.

The four remaining vehicles will be evenly split between the two defense giants.

The vehicles that the Army is likely to seek funding for are the non-line of sight cannon, the reconnaissance vehicle, the infantry carrier vehicle and the command and control vehicle, according to industry sources.

The Army will defer the development and production of the other four, but could invest some research money into them.

Part of the restructuring plan is also to have the digital network be developed separately from the vehicles.

The Army has restructured the program several times, as the program has garnered criticism and funding cuts on Capitol Hill, particularly in the House.

The Army has already canceled or deferred several other components in the last few years, including the intelligent munitions system, the armored personnel carrier, the mounted combat system and several kinds of unmanned aerial vehicles.

The program has been mentioned as one major target for cuts and changes under the new Obama administration.

Any kind of major restructuring of the program before Obama Pentagon officials and advisers get to it could ensure that the Army restructures the program on its own terms and could present a plan to the new administration that it could accept.

Even with the expected restructuring in the works, the Army is launching a public-relations campaign to drum up support for the program. The Army is planning a series of events to showcase its vehicles and network, including a media event at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md., to display the service's new network integration and test center.

 
 
 
BLOGS
TheHill.com Blogs Briefing Room Pundits Room Congress Blog Twitter Room
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.