The Hill
Sunday, July 05, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room Blog
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Cheri Jacobus
John Del Cecato
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Announcements
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Aerospace
Energy Special Report
Telecom Special Report
Transport Special Report
Earth Day Special Report
Consumer Safety Report
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Business & Lobbying arrow Medicare’s private insurers await impending cutbacks
Business & Lobbying PDF Print E-mail
Medicare’s private insurers await impending cutbacks
Posted: 11/24/08 06:28 PM [ET]

Congress and the incoming Obama administration are poised to slash subsidies to private insurers under Medicare, a move that could significantly change the landscape for health plans in the entitlement program — and their beneficiaries.

A longstanding ideological battle between liberals and conservatives over the propriety of turning over a growing portion of the Medicare entitlement to private companies is meeting head-on with the need for Congress to make cuts to certain programs in order to finance other priorities.

Democrats — and, increasingly, some prominent Republicans — cite multiple studies that show private insurance plans cost the taxpayer an average of 13 percent more per beneficiary than traditional Medicare costs.

The government spends $94 billion a year on Medicare Advantage subsidies. Democrats say $15 billion of that amount is excessive and that these so-called overpayments to private insurers could be spent on other things, such as comprehensive healthcare reform.

Earlier this year, Congress overrode President Bush’s veto to enact $14 billion in cuts to Medicare Advantage over five years.

“Further cuts are coming to the program. The payments are so high that they really don’t make any sense right now. There really is no rationale for the level of payments,” a Democratic congressional aide said Monday at an event sponsored by the journal Health Affairs.

Democrats are not alone in their skepticism about the value of the dollars set aside for Medicare Advantage, though Republicans generally are skeptical of Democratic plans to make deep cuts to the subsidies.

A Republican aide emphasized at the event that government-run Medicare, by far the largest healthcare purchaser in the United States, influences the market to such a degree that the private plans’ performance cannot be evaluated fairly.

“The underlying Medicare fee-for-service program hugely distorts the market for healthcare services,” the GOP aide said. “Generally, Republicans have concerns about public programs crowding out private options.”

Private health insurance companies, which provide benefits under the Medicare Advantage program, count nearly one-quarter of Medicare enrollees on their rolls.

Deep cuts in the subsidies to these plans could cause them to abandon Medicare, creating uncertainty for the more than 10 million seniors and disabled people signed up for Medicare Advantage plans.

The funds targeted for cuts allow private plans to offer extra benefits, such as vision and dental coverage, which traditional Medicare does not provide. In addition, the plans can reduce beneficiaries’ out-of-pocket costs.

Enrollment in the private plans grew — simultaneous with the introduction of private Medicare Part D prescription drug plans — but so did costs.


 
 
 
BLOGS
TheHill.com Blogs Briefing Room Pundits Room Congress Blog Twitter Room
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.