By Alexander Bolton - 12/04/13 06:00 AM EST
Republican lawmakers bashed the Obama administration at a House Judiciary Committee hearing Tuesday for opting not to enforce core parts of the Affordable Care Act, such as minimum requirements for individual healthcare plans.
Rep. Trent Franks (Ariz.), the chairman of the Judiciary panel’s Constitution and Civil Justice subcommittee, said Congress should sue the administration to spur Obama to enforce the healthcare law as written.
“He simply embodies a breathtaking arrogance that ignores the law he’s sworn to uphold.”
But neither Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) nor Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has endorsed a potential lawsuit against the administration.
A spokesman for Boehner referred questions about a potential lawsuit to the House Judiciary panel.
A spokesman for McConnell did not respond to a request for comment.
Boehner and McConnell have taken on Obama in the courts. The Speaker took on the administration when it shifted its stance on the Defense of Marriage Act. McConnell filed an amicus brief on Obama’s use of recess appointees.
Republicans on the Judiciary Committee highlighted various laws Tuesday that the administration has declined to enforce, such as immigration law.
Obama announced during the 2012 presidential campaign that he would halt the deportation of law-abiding illegal immigrants who were brought to the country as children.
“Mr. Obama is unilaterally ignoring immigration law in many cases,” Franks said at Tuesday’s hearing.
Rep. Luis Gutiérrez (D-Ill.) defended Obama’s action and noted at the hearing that he had three such immigrants working in his congressional office.
“They’re here. There are 11 million of them. Let’s figure out a way how we legalize their status,” he said
The administration has also eased off of prosecuting the federal prohibition against marijuana in states that have decriminalized the sale and use of the drug.
The administration announced over the summer it would reduce mandatory-minimum sentencing, and in September, Attorney General Eric Holder expanded mandatory-minimum sentencing relief.
Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) said last month she is discussing with several GOP colleagues the possibility of suing Obama over his decision to suspend the Affordable Care Act’s requirements for health insurance plans, which threatened to cause millions of people to lose their policies.
The congresswoman’s office told the MinnPost: “She and some of her colleagues have had discussions about the best recourse to put a stop to his unconstitutional actions.”
However, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and a former clerk to Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito while he was on the Third Circuit Court, is skeptical.
He said it would be difficult for Congress to demonstrate that it had legal standing to sue the administration for delaying ObamaCare’s employer mandate or allowing insurance companies to continue offering plans that did not meet the law’s requirements.
“There are a couple problems. The president and those who are advising him are very smart. They’ve made these executive modifications in areas where it may be difficult to find someone who can establish Article III standing,” he said.
“Take the one-year suspension of the employer mandate. Who’s injured by that?” he added. “Because these are one-year suspensions we’re looking at, it can be somewhat difficult to push through a piece of litigation in that one-year period.”
The danger potential GOP litigants face is that it would take far longer than a year to resolve their complaints in court, by which time the one-year suspension of the employer mandate or the health plan requirements would be moot.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), another member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and a former clerk to former Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist hasn’t endorsed the legal option, either. He says it’s premature to discuss his next round of tactics for dismantling ObamaCare.
But Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) on Tuesday countered that Congress would have little recourse to curb Obama’s power if it could not use the courts.
“If we cannot go and get the court to decide the differences between the two branches then … the imperial presidency is complete,” he said.
Republicans on the Judiciary Committee warned Tuesday that Obama had dramatically expanded the powers of the presidency and eclipsed Congress’s authority.
Franks at Tuesday’s hearing pointed to other actions taken by the administration not based explicitly on laws passed by Congress.
He cited taxation of political contributions, political speech disclosures for federal contractors and the deep-water drilling ban.