THE HILL
 

New administration rules could trigger lobbying deregistration rush

By Dave Wenhold - 09/29/09 07:00 PM ET

And here we go again.

In the latest head-scratching, ill-advised policy coming from the White House, the administration has decided to ban lobbyists from serving on public agency advisory boards and committees.

With hundreds of advisory boards and committees, the loss of registered, law-abiding, compliant, subject-matter experts — who just happen to call themselves lobbyists — will have many unintended consequences that could threaten the efficacy of these boards to make solid recommendations to the government.

These advisory boards, committees and groups need, and should be able, to identify the best people possible to serve, regardless of job title. Should the administration ban CEOs next because of their companies’ interests or associations that the administration doesn’t agree with? The argument that there is some perceived inherent danger in working with a lobbyist is simply absurd.

The unintended consequences of this latest policy are in direct conflict with the administration’s stated goals of increasing transparency, limiting big special interests and being inclusive of all solid ideas.

Individuals will simply deregister as “lobbyists” in order to remain on the advisory boards and committees and shift their lobbying responsibilities so as not to trigger the registration threshold. They will continue to provide the service to their clients, but will no longer be subjected to any rules governing them!

Also, because the small and medium associations, organizations and businesses make up a large percentage of these positions, they are going to be disenfranchised from participating because most cannot afford to assign a different non-lobbyist expert to serve on these advisory boards and committees. Conversely, the Fortune 500 and other major corporations can afford to do so; therefore, this policy will only increase their input. So once again, the people and voices representing Main Street won’t have a say, while Wall Street gets more say.

The hypocrisy of the administration’s anti-lobbying policy is illustrated by its announcement that it wanted to rid the boards of registered lobbyists who have ties to industry; yet, not a week later, the administration went against its own internal policy and named a lobbyist to head the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. I am sure this person will do an excellent job and is the right person for the position, but the fact that the administration says one thing and does the complete opposite is mind-blowing. The agencies in charge of these advisory boards must be astounded by the “Do as I say, not as I do” policy that they are being forced to implement.

Additionally, it cannot be reassuring to those in charge of these advisory boards and committees that they will ultimately be responsible for creating and implementing policies while eliminating many of their longtime experts. The loss of those skilled in both the institutional knowledge of the industry and knowledge of the political process will only serve to weaken the decisions made on these policies. At a time when our country needs the best merit-based decisions, putting political neophytes on a board dealing with complex issues is surely a recipe for disaster.

The administration’s need to continually point to lobbyists as the “problem” reminds me of the parable of the scorpion and the frog. Instead of working together to create a better solution and a more transparent community, they decide to “sting the frog that is helping them” and ultimately hurt themselves in the process. It appears this administration cannot help itself because, as the parable states, “it’s in their nature.” This administration would rather cut off its nose to spite its face than ever admit that lobbyists can, and do, add value to the political process.

 
Wenhold, CAE, is a founding partner of Miller/Wenhold Capitol Strategies, a Washington government-affairs and grassroots lobbying firm. He also serves as president of the American League of Lobbyists. He can be reached at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Source:
http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/k-street-insiders/k-street-insiders/60823-new-administration-rules-could-trigger-lobbying-deregistration-rush

Comments (2)

Mr. Wenhold obviously is unaware of a giant corruption probe that began about 6 years ago and is run by D.C. Special Counsel. I was in the process of running a sting for investigators and the DHS Asst Secretaries, their Deputies, Chiefs of Staff and Program Managers dropping like flies all last year. The only way Mr. Wenhold could have learned they had been caught was if he had called the switchboard and asked for them. The reply people would get from the operator was that they wouldn't be returning to work, with no explanation why given. Marcus Stern's (Propublica) 12/3/08 article makes reference to this giant probe when the article tells how Mitchell Wade also answered questions related to another very important large investigation. There are about 1,000 people being indicted in this other investigation…clearly Mr. Wenhold's friends!All the people that fell had conflicts of interest (pension stock, former lobbyists, simultaneously employed by contractors, Board of Directors posts) that they carried into their DHS posts. Everyone at the Homeland Security Advisory Council, too, has conflicts of interest that they protect via policy decisions. That some of those people were knowing 911-insiders and had conflicts of interest shared with 911's masterminds and financiers is still another issue!I head federal operations for the tech standard NIST calls "smart wallet." 911's masterminds offered management a 100 % financing package starting 12/1/01. This is the world's only next-gen identification credential and the only one not compromised with 911's orchestrators. 8 months into the financing package being extended and at that point very much more sweetened as we persistently were told everyone who needed to be bought had been to force us to accept the package, I developed a unique to government contracting paper trail in which I was told to found a federal launch and given instructions how to go about the launch. Such things happen when a company has an invention of merit, but the more than 100 solicitations for money from members of Congress pouring into my Sea Cliff, NY mailbox told me merit means nothing with Appropriators.The DHS when it opened was run exclusively by Special Interests and to this day is run by Special Interests. The first financing offer extended 19 mos, and I later declined to buyout offers from agents of 911's masterminds. If I should have a change of heart, 911's planners have a retreat less than 5 minutes drive from my house and office. There's so much apart of the grand jury investigation the public doesn't know about, including who was behind 911 and where the training really was done. Here's a hint: 911's masterminds are a type of Orthodox Christian with institutions not readily found in the U.S.Truth to emerge: Corruption is terrorism's greatest financier!Mr. Wenhold is defending a status quo that indictments soon will prove led to the DHS leadership and advisors becoming 911-insiders. Mr. Wenhold's defense of the status quo has made him a 911-insider, too.BY Anonymous on 10/01/2009 at 16:55
Some of points from this article are very helpful for me as I haven’tBY storesonline on 10/11/2009 at 01:58

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.