The Hill
Sunday, July 05, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room Blog
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Cheri Jacobus
John Del Cecato
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Announcements
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Aerospace
Energy Special Report
Telecom Special Report
Transport Special Report
Earth Day Special Report
Consumer Safety Report
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Campaign arrow Ads by Romney, Hunter fail to make early marks
Campaign PDF Print E-mail
Ads by Romney, Hunter fail to make early marks
Posted: 03/07/07 06:53 PM [ET]
The first ads of the 2008 presidential campaign got lukewarm receptions from political insiders and are unlikely to be memorable when the primaries begin early next year, according to a survey by Wilson Research Strategies.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (R) made a splash by being the first major presidential candidate to launch campaign ads in important primary states. While their effectiveness was rated slightly above average, they didn’t strike respondents as particularly memorable or worth talking about.

Meanwhile, Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) ran commercials in primary states through his political action committee (PAC), not his official campaign. Those ads scored average across the board except for their appeal, which was very low.

Respondents preferred Romney’s ads to Hunter’s by about a 2-to-1 margin, but Romney’s didn’t score significantly better in individual categories.

Romney’s ad features panning shots of the Republican candidate, flanked by a large American flag, giving a speech about his beliefs on how government should run.

The ad scored well for its strength of message and its effectiveness, with a 6.0 and 5.6, respectively, on a scale of 1 to 10. It fell short, however, in measures of memorability (4.8) and buzz-worthiness (4.5).

The ad did score well in every category among Republicans. But it wasn’t memorable or buzz-worthy among Democrats or independents.

Hunter’s ad, which shows him walking along the double fence at the Mexican border near San Diego and talking about illegal-immigration enforcement, scored slightly better for memorability and buzz, but it fell short on measures of effectiveness and appeal.

Respondents gave Hunter a 4.1 for the ad’s appeal and a 4.8 for its effectiveness. Independents and Democrats gave the commercial equally low marks, while Republicans scored it above 6.0 on every measure except appeal (5.6).

“The Hunter ad really doesn’t stand out at all,” said Chris Wilson, CEO of Wilson Research Strategies. “In fact, it’s a little bit below average in terms of effectiveness and appeal, which is where he probably needs to be doing a lot better.”

The ad, which was paid for by Hunter’s Peace Through Strength PAC, began running in January. The Romney ads began airing in February.

Working with The Hill for its Air War feature, Wilson Research Strategies e-mails campaign or issue ads to survey participants who view the ads and rate their effectiveness on several criteria.
 
 
 
BLOGS
TheHill.com Blogs Briefing Room Pundits Room Congress Blog Twitter Room
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.