The Hill
Monday, July 06, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room Blog
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Cheri Jacobus
John Del Cecato
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Announcements
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Aerospace
Energy Special Report
Telecom Special Report
Transport Special Report
Earth Day Special Report
Consumer Safety Report
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Campaign arrow All eyes on big speech at Invesco Field
Campaign PDF Print E-mail
All eyes on big speech at Invesco Field
Posted: 08/27/08 08:46 PM [ET]

DENVER — Barack Obama’s speech Thursday night will determine whether the Democratic convention was a successful launch into the fall campaign or a high-profile display of intra-party bickering and meaningless theatrics that could drown out whatever message the candidate wants to convey to undecided voters.

For Obama  to right a convention ship that hit some big rocks this week, he faces several significant challenges, analysts warn, not least of which is the possibility that the voters Obama most covets — white, blue-collar voters — could be turned off by the glitz of a speech in front of 75,000 fans. Democratic strategists said Thursday that for Obama’s speech to be considered a success, he has to strike the right balance between the lofty, inspirational rhetoric for which he is known and a concrete connection with voters that lets them know Obama is not that different from them and shares their concerns.

“He has got to raise voters’ comfort level with him as commander in chief and as the steward of the economy,” Democratic strategist Dan Gerstein said. “They’re not quite ready to give him the keys to the country.”

Democratic strategists James Carville and Stan Greenberg said Obama, who has come to be seen as a “cool” or “suave” candidate, could go a long way in connecting with voters by showing some anger or disgust about the condition of the economy and the war in Iraq, but they warn that he must be sincere.

“That’s what they’ve got to see,” Greenberg said. “It’s an engagement. It’s a passion. I think one of the challenges is how he gets there authentically.”



Greenberg and Carville, two former aides to the Clintons, spoke to a group of reporters Wednesday at a lunch sponsored by The Christian Science Monitor. Both men, who gained prominence with the rise of Bill Clinton to the presidency, said they are wary of the venue Obama’s campaign chose for such a critical speech.

“I’m nervous about the stadium as a format,” said Greenberg, a prominent Democratic pollster. He said “the festive quality” of a stadium filled with more than 75,000 cheering people, perhaps doing “the wave,” could diminish the candidate’s ability to communicate to undecided voters that he understands that people are hurting economically.

Greenberg noted that such a view on TV sets across America could defeat Obama’s attempts to show empathy. “Out in the real world, you know, people are struggling,” he said.

Carville and Greenberg also noted that media reports and pictures that appeared Wednesday, describing a Greek architecture-inspired temple from which Obama will speak, could cancel out any effort to strike a chord with voters angry at Republicans but unsure whether Obama is a candidate of substance and not just, as Republicans have said, a celebrity short on experience and ability.


 
 
 
BLOGS
TheHill.com Blogs Briefing Room Pundits Room Congress Blog Twitter Room
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.