The Hill
Monday, July 06, 2009
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
Twitter Room Blog
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign
Obama Cabinet
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Cheri Jacobus
John Del Cecato
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Announcements
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Aerospace
Energy Special Report
Telecom Special Report
Transport Special Report
Earth Day Special Report
Consumer Safety Report
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Campaign arrow The Air War
Campaign PDF Print E-mail
The Air War
Posted: 09/14/06 12:00 AM [ET]

The advertisements for the two candidates running in the hotly contested Senate race in Missouri reflect the political climate.

Republican Sen. Jim Talent makes no mention of his party affiliation while Democratic state Auditor Claire McCaskill is concerned with establishing her red- state credentials. Each candidate tries to appeal to the centrist voters of the other’s party.

Talent stresses his bipartisanship and his ability to pass legislation combating methamphetamine addiction, bringing home money for roads and bridges and adding incentives to increase the use of ethanol in gasoline. McCaskill’s ad features her mother and daughter to hammer the point that she’s from Missouri: her dad worked in a mill and taught her the values of integrity and hard work.

The survey conducted by Wilson Research Strategies showed that the advertisements were equally appealing:Talent’s ad was slightly more effective than McCaskill’s ad, 42 to 38 percent. But among independents, McCaskill’s ad trumped Talent’s by 42 to 34 percent.

Nevertheless, neither ad was particularly impressive to the respondents in terms of message, effectiveness or an ad that “I would talk about.” Both ads scored lower than the average in each category. Yet they were equally appealing, earning a 5.8 on a 10-point scale. McCaskill’s ad was more memorable.

Talent led McCaskill in the survey 32 to 19 percent, but 49 percent did not know who would win—perhaps indicating just how tight the race is. Political handicapper Stuart Rothenberg wrote last week in his newsletter that of the five most vulnerable Republican seats, the Republicans are most likely to hold Talent’s seat.

The race is “still a toss-up,” he wrote, “but don’t bet against Talent.”

Talent’s ads tested very well among Capitol Hill staffers and lobbyists whereas both groups, especially senior Capitol Hill staffers, panned McCaskill’s ad.

“The D.C. community thinks this is a better ad than middle America,” said Chris Wilson, president of Wilson Research. “In an anti-incumbent year, and maybe an anti-Republican year, what you’re seeing is that the traditional ads are being eschewed by the public.”

Working with The Hill for its Air War feature, Wilson Research Strategies e-mails campaign or issue ads to survey participants who view the ads and rate their effectiveness on several criteria.

 
 
 
BLOGS
TheHill.com Blogs Briefing Room Pundits Room Congress Blog Twitter Room
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2009 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.