Fight over tax reform would dominate first year of a Romney presidency

Mitt Romney’s selection of Rep. Paul RyanPaul Davis RyanGeorge Will: Vote against GOP in midterms Trump tweet may doom House GOP effort on immigration On The Money — Sponsored by Prudential — Trump floats tariffs on European cars | Nikki Haley slams UN report on US poverty | Will tax law help GOP? It's a mystery MORE (R-Wis.) for vice president made the 2012 election about big domestic policy changes, especially Ryan’s plan to transform Medicare. 

But getting a polarized Washington to enact reforms quickly will be a huge task even if the GOP takes control of the Senate.

Washington experts and congressional aides from both parties say that for political and procedural reasons, year one of the Romney-Ryan administration would be much more about taxes and “ObamaCare” than about Medicare, let alone Ryan’s ideas on Social Security. 

With the Ryan choice, any fear or hope that Romney would pivot to Obama-style stimulus spending after the election is effectively dead. 

But enacting the elements of Ryan’s House-passed budget will rely on arcane budget procedures — and could depend on the ability of Ryan to cut some deals with vulnerable Democrats, experts said.

After a November win, Romney and Ryan would have to pressure a lame-duck Congress and the Obama administration to turn away from the “fiscal cliff” of tax increases and spending cuts set to hit Jan. 1. Experts expect the new team will be able to gain at least a six-month reprieve by arguing they need time to put their vision — newly mandated by voters — in place. 

Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former Congressional Budget Office director and adviser to Sen. John McCainJohn Sidney McCainDon’t disrespect McCain by torpedoing his clean National Defense Authorization Act Meghan McCain rips Trump's 'gross' line about her dad Trump's America fights back MORE (R-Ariz.) during his 2008 presidential bid, said Romney’s first task after inauguration will be repealing President Obama’s healthcare reform law.

“That is the first thing they have to do,” he said. “They will then focus on tax reform. We need to grow more rapidly.”

Holtz-Eakin said Romney and Ryan would not likely reform Medicare without first courting bipartisan support, however. 

“If Ryan-Romney win, they would certainly pursue a major tax cut plan,” Bob Bixby of the anti-deficit pressure group The Concord Coalition agreed. “It would be very difficult to do entitlement reform and tax reform at the same time.”

He said the key variable is the size of a GOP Senate majority after the elections, and whether Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellPolitical figures pay tribute to Charles Krauthammer Charles Krauthammer dies at the age of 68 Overnight Energy: EPA declines to write new rule for toxic spills | Senate blocks move to stop Obama water rule | EPA bought 'tactical' pants and polos MORE (R-Ky.) — who could become the chamber’s majority leader if Republicans capture the majority there — can spare some defections on entitlements. 

When the 2012 Ryan budget came up for a vote in the Senate this year, five Republicans voted against it. 

The budget from Ryan, the House Budget Committee chairman, offers future seniors a choice of staying in traditional fee-for-service Medicare or opting out and receiving a government subsidy to buy a pre-approved private policy. 

GOP naysayers Sens. Scott Brown (Mass.), Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsSenate Gang of Four to meet next week on immigration Republicans agree — it’s only a matter of time for Scott Pruitt Skyrocketing insulin prices provoke new outrage MORE (Maine) and Dean HellerDean Arthur HellerTreasury gave special designation to Nevada county after GOP lobbying: report The Hill's Morning Report — Sponsored by PhRMA — Immigration drama grips Washington The Hill's Morning Report — Sponsored by PhRMA — GOP lawmakers race to find an immigration fix MORE (Nev.) are looking to return next year, as is Sen. Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard PaulGOP senators call for probe of federal grants on climate change Overnight Health Care — Presented by the Association of American Medical Colleges — Key ObamaCare groups in limbo | Opioids sending thousands of kids into foster care | House passes bill allowing Medicaid to pay for opioid treatments US watchdog: 'We failed' to stem Afghan opium production MORE (R-Ky.), who felt the plan did not cut enough spending. 

Conservative Brian Darling of The Heritage Foundation predicted that Romney and Ryan would use budget reconciliation procedures to pass both tax reform and Medicare changes, to bypass a Senate Democratic filibuster. 

Once both the House and Senate have passed a budget, Republicans could use a fast-tracked reconciliation bill to enact major policies. This type of bill only needs 51 votes to pass in the Senate, rather than the 60 votes needed to break a filibuster.

“After setting up a filibuster-proof reconciliation vehicle for tax reform and entitlement reform, the negotiations would begin to see what the Republicans could get passed in a 2013 Congress,” he said.

Bill Hoagland, a former Senate Budget GOP staff director, agreed that Romney and Ryan would try to pass everything “you could possibly cram in” to a budget reconciliation bill. 

But he warned reconciliation could be difficult for technical reasons.

Even though the process was used to pass the 2003 Bush-era tax cuts, which increased the federal deficit, it is by no means a given that Senate rules would allow a tax reform plan that adds to the deficit, he said. 

Democrats said they will make political hay out of any attempt to offset tax reforms with cuts to social programs like food stamps. 

Hoagland said that using reconciliation to pass Medicare reforms faces bigger hurdles. 

The Ryan plan involves authorizing-type legislation to set up a system of government-approved private plans. The Senate’s Byrd Rule could be raised against this on the floor, as authorizing on a reconciliation bill is not permitted. 

On top of this, the Ryan plan does not affect seniors for 10 years. Reconciliation bills under current rules only deal with changes in a 10-year budget window.

Because tax reform will involve eliminating popular tax breaks, it is more likely that the new administration will seek a deal, other experts said. This could put Ryan in the key spot of negotiating, as Romney would risk conservative ire if he tried to do a deal without Ryan’s seal of approval. 

House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.) this summer laid out a blueprint for tax reform, and he and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max BaucusMax Sieben BaucusClients’ Cohen ties become PR liability Green Party puts Dem seat at risk in Montana Business groups worried about Trump's China tariffs plan MORE (D-Mont.) plan to work together on a plan no matter who wins in the fall. 

The stumbling block is whether tax reform raises any new revenue to reduce the deficit, as Democrats are insisting. 

Scott Lilly, a former Democratic staff director of the House Appropriations Committee, now at the Center for American Progress, indicated Romney could get some bipartisan cooperation on tax cuts. 

“There are likely to be few Democrats who go along with a wide range of things,” he predicted. 

Steve Ellis of Taxpayers for Common Sense said Democratic senators up for reelection would be prime targets for wooing. These include Sens. Mark BegichMark Peter BegichFormer Alaska senator jumps into governor race Overnight Energy: Trump directs Perry to stop coal plant closures | EPA spent ,560 on customized pens | EPA viewed postcard to Pruitt as a threat Perez creates advisory team for DNC transition MORE (D-Alaska), Mary LandrieuMary Loretta LandrieuLandrieu dynasty faces a pause in Louisiana Senate GOP rejects Trump’s call to go big on gun legislation Project Veritas at risk of losing fundraising license in New York, AG warns MORE (D-La.), Chris CoonsChristopher (Chris) Andrew CoonsSenate moderates hunt for compromise on family separation bill All the times Horowitz contradicted Wray — but nobody seemed to notice Hillicon Valley: Trump hits China with massive tech tariffs | Facebook meets with GOP leaders over bias allegations | Judge sends Manafort to jail ahead of trial | AT&T completes Time Warner purchase MORE (D-Del.) and Mark PryorMark Lunsford PryorMedicaid rollback looms for GOP senators in 2020 Cotton pitches anti-Democrat message to SC delegation Ex-Sen. Kay Hagan joins lobby firm MORE (D-Ark.).

Holtz-Eakin noted that Ryan collaborated with House Budget Committee ranking member Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) to try to move a type of line-item veto bill and said those seeing Ryan as a hardliner are making a mistake. 

But Lilly sees the possibility that a more limited role for Ryan could come about, especially if Romney comes to view his ideology as a liability. “I see the guy as a visionary and as an ideologue. I have seen very little evidence that he compromises.”