The Hill
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Editorial arrow Being seen and heard
Editorial PDF Print E-mail
Being seen and heard
Posted: 04/07/08 05:10 PM [ET]

Tuesday’s Capitol Hill testimony by Gen. David Petraeus, commander in Iraq, and Ambassador Ryan Crocker has an air of unreality about it, for the hearings will have little to do with oversight of the executive branch, which is their ostensible purpose.

Let’s start with Sen. John Kerry’s (D-Mass.) comment, quoted by The Washington Post on Monday, that,

“It’s all completely predictable this time, what everyone is going to say.”

This is true. Democrats have long said the Iraq war is a failure and it is past time to pull out American troops. Republicans argue that the troop surge executed by Petraeus has succeeded and there is a real chance of America achieving a good proportion of its goals.

These positions have hardened as the November election has drawn nearer. Each party knows the position it is fighting from, and lawmakers from both sides can be expected to stick to their scripts. As is fairly common, the hearing will therefore be less about what executive branch officials say to lawmakers than about what lawmakers say to the public.

Thus, the hearing is (and is bound to be) almost entirely political. Which makes it odd for Sen. Joseph Biden (D-Del.), chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, to say, “The biggest mistake we could make is politicizing this …” when in truth, there is no way he can stop it.

Certainly he cannot by declining, as he has, to allow Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), front-runner for his party’s presidential nomination, to move up the pecking order to where he could be certain of speaking in time for the evening news.

Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), the Republican nominee-in-waiting, will take position front and center during the Armed Services Committee hearing because, as ranking member, he may cut in freely, and anyway speaks immediately after the chairman, Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.).

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), another member of Armed Services and the third of the three plausible presidential nominees, will, meanwhile, be waiting her turn low down the seniority list.

Seniority often gives way to convenience in speaking order at hearings. Lawmakers get permission to go out of turn so they can rush away to another event on their schedule. It would be odd for the Democrats to keep their two candidates waiting, when all eyes are on them, although Biden (whose own presidential poll numbers never broke out of the margin of error) could be forgiven for asking of Obama, “Must he have everything?”

These are the first hearings in a long while that the presidential hopefuls have attended. With the events ineradicably political, the Democrats surely would want to help their candidates shine as brightly as McCain.

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.