The Hill
Tuesday, December 02, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Editorial arrow Bills that go bump in the night
Editorial PDF Print E-mail
Bills that go bump in the night
Posted: 12/18/07 06:00 PM [ET]

That heavy thump you heard shortly after midnight on Monday was the sound of a 3,565-page spending bill landing on the legislative calendar. How many pages will lawmakers have read by they time they vote on it? Five hundred maybe, or possibly a thousand if they’re both conscientious and quick.

But it’s impolite to count. No one is going to get through the legislation before it becomes law. That’s the point. For the odd thing about the omnibus is that despite its bulk — it contains 11 spending bills — it is actually built for speed. It is designed to skate through the House, proceed just as swiftly through the Senate, return to the House with funds for the Iraq war and get lawmakers out of town.

Consider what has been excised: a provision easing restrictions on trade with Cuba — out; language allowing federal aid to go to clinics that counsel on abortion — out; language forcing the government to pay prevailing wages — out. All of these controversial policy riders were cut to avoid President Bush’s veto.

Now consider what has been included. Knowing passage is likely, lawmakers shoveled the omnibus full of pork. There are at least 9,200 earmarks in the combined bills — 696 pages of line items, many “airdropped” in at the last moment. The omnibus contains $11 billion of “emergency” spending but that phrase is used so loosely that it includes $100 million for next year’s presidential nominating conventions.

So here we are at the end of 2007 and another round of appropriating will have been completed without the irksome task of doing it transparently. It has happened this way for decades under Republicans and Democrats alike.

President Reagan blasted the process in 1988 and House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt (D-Mo.) blasted it in 1998. Someone will blast it again in 2008, for nothing will have changed.

Like St. Augustine praying, “Lord, make me good, but not yet,” Congress doffs its cap to reform. It establishes procedures to reduce earmarks and to shame the authors of the most egregious. But then leaders negotiate secretly and cobble together a massive, misshapen bill that mocks any suggestion that a new leaf has been turned on Capitol Hill.

It is both weird and easy to understand the core paradox of congressional appropriations, which is this: Almost everyone agrees that the system is broken, and almost nobody is willing to do anything about it.

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.