The Hill
Tuesday, December 02, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Editorial arrow Clever tactics
Editorial PDF Print E-mail
Clever tactics
Posted: 11/09/07 08:24 PM [ET]

The Senate’s 79-14 vote Thursday on the Water Resources Development Act was the first veto override of the Bush presidency.

Many presidents more popular than this one have arrived at lame-duck status by this point in their incumbencies. Bush now knows that the Republican cohorts on Capitol Hill have ceased to be his. He cannot count on them to back him, even though they still do on many issues.

One cannot know what bill, if any, might produce a second override, but having broken ranks with Bush once, GOP lawmakers will find it easier to do again.

It is interesting to look at the override not merely as a precedent — the big first step — but rather as the culmination of a more intriguing and less familiar process. It was a process deftly manipulated by the Democratic majority controlling Congress.

The water bill was vetoed and the veto was overridden not at the outset of a legislative phase but at its conclusion.

The bill itself was ready for the president weeks ago, with big majorities in favor of its $23 billion worth of projects.

(There is a bipartisan taste for bills that bring federal money and jobs to congressional districts.)

But the water bill was not the only piece of legislation for which there were substantial majorities in both chambers and on which a veto override was possible.

The other was the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), and Congress and the administration spent weeks fighting over it. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) very deliberately decided to undertake the much tougher challenge of getting SCHIP renewal enacted before turning to the much easier task of brushing the president aside on the water bill.

Which bill was more likely to attract public sympathy — water or children’s health? Hmmm — not difficult for Pelosi and Reid to answer. So they engaged their political enemies on SCHIP first, knowing it would be a long fight generating weeks of bad PR for Republicans preaching fiscal responsibility. And in the end, if they could not override the veto, they could bring in the water bill for a swift smack-down of the beleaguered executive.

If the Democrats had done the water bill first, the memory of the override would have been buried beneath weeks of battle that ended in presidential victory on SCHIP.

But, using the water bill as their ace in the hole, the Democrats instead secured an easy victory at the conclusion of a long fight that leaves Republicans nursing their SCHIP black eyes.

The Democrats may not have been right about how much taxpayer money should be spent expanding children’s health insurance and paying for water projects all over the nation; both bills came with hefty price tags. However, being right is not the same thing as being clever, and the majority party was certainly clever in its congressional tactics. 

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.