The Hill
Friday, August 29, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
CONVENTIONS
Democratic
Republican
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Editorial arrow Durham bulls
Editorial PDF Print E-mail
Durham bulls
Posted: 09/07/07 07:13 PM [ET]

It’s widely agreed that former Sen. Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.) lost the GOP presidential debate in Durham, N.H., Wednesday night — because he didn’t take part. He parried that wisdom fairly neatly on his TV appearance with Jay Leno by saying the debate itself was not “a very enlightening forum.”

It’s certainly true that the debates are stilted and that a sense of sameness emerges from them despite their evident differences of outcome. That is because campaigns insist on essentially identical trappings (podiums, lighting, colors, etc.) every time.

As noted, however, the outcomes differ markedly. And so it was with this week’s outing. Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), who has looked stiff and angry in previous encounters despite, or perhaps because of, his repeated use of the phrase “my friends” to engage the audience, put in a strong and effective performance this time. He was forceful and authoritative and easily slapped former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney into line during an exchange about Iraq.

Romney, seeking to put distance between himself and President Bush on the war, said the surge in U.S. troop numbers was “apparently working.”

McCain interjected: “Governor, the surge is working. The surge is working, sir.”

Romney: “That’s just what I said.”

McCain: “No, not ‘apparently.’ It’s working.”

The senator much more effectively distanced himself from the administration when he said, “Nothing we could gain from torture could possibly be worth the damage to the integrity of our country.”

So, a good night for McCain.

But the winner was Rudy Giuliani. The former New York City mayor has been criticized, and will continue to be criticized, for answering so many questions with reflections on his tenure commanding and cleaning up the great city.

The criticism misses the point. The core and nearly the entire content of Giuliani’s campaign is his record as a brilliant executive during a harrowing time of trial. The presidential election is the process of choosing an executive, and there is no doubting that America, at war, is going through a time of trial. Every time Giuliani harks back to his lead role in New York’s renaissance and to his 24/7 work ethic in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, he makes the point that he is the man for this turbulent and dangerous season in the nation’s history.

His may not be the right message, but it also might be. It certainly is not obviously wrong, and Giuliani can’t be faulted for sticking to it. He did so on Wednesday and he can probably expect a bump in the polls as a result.


 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.