The Hill
Monday, October 13, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
Hillscape
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Editorial arrow Schumer unbound
Editorial PDF Print E-mail
Schumer unbound
Posted: 10/05/07 06:51 PM [ET]
Does Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) ever get bad news? We’re just asking, in the light of Sen. Pete Domenici’s (R-N.M.) decision to retire at the end of this Congress, throwing open another GOP seat.

Schumer, chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC), presided over his party’s six-seat pick-up in last year’s midterm congressional elections. He now looks increasingly likely to preside over a pick-up of the same size or perhaps even better.

This would mean that in just four years, the brash New Yorker would have helped elevate Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) from the position of minority leader to that of majority leader with a sufficient caucus to flatten attempted GOP filibusters, especially with the handful of Republican centrists in the upper chamber.

Timing is key, and Schumer’s is perfect. Which politician wouldn’t like to take over a campaign committee at the precise moment when a second-term president from the other party was about to suffer a popularity implosion, and when, simultaneously, the opposition party was about to suffer a series of self-inflicted black eyes for corruption?

Schumer must pinch himself to check he’s not dreaming about his good fortune in taking over not just in those favorable circumstances but also when the sweeping Republican triumphs of previous cycles have offered successive elections in which the GOP has been forced to defend far more seats than the Democrats.

Schumer will approach the prospect of fighting for the New Mexico seat against Rep. Heather Wilson (R), who confirmed her candidacy Thursday, with equanimity. She only narrowly retained her House seat last year and is tainted by the U.S. attorneys firing scandal.

The DSCC is confident of shifting New Mexico from the red column to the blue almost no matter which of the several possible Democratic candidates becomes its chosen standard-bearer.

But here’s a test for Schumer. If he surveys the New Mexican landscape for the strongest candidate, who does he see? There’s Rep. Tom Udall; he would be a serious contender against Wilson. One could go on and name a few others, but only if one were determined to ignore the 800-pound gorilla — we hope he will excuse the comparison — who could probably take the vacant New Mexico seat in a walk.

That is Gov. Bill Richardson. We haven’t forgotten he is running for the Democratic presidential nomination. And no, we don’t dismiss the notion that he has his sights on being Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s (D-N.Y.) vice presidential pick.

But, for the sake of argument, let’s assume he really wants the presidency. He must now see that he is unlikely to get it. Might not the persuasive Mr. Schumer prod the capable Mr. Richardson into a Senate bid?

The latter man has the credentials, and the former has the chutzpah. He also tends to get what he wants, as he did when former Virginia Gov. Mark Warner (D) opted against holding out for a vice presidential nod and launched his Senate bid.
 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.