The Hill
Tuesday, December 02, 2008
SEARCH
Home
HillTube
Mobile
White Papers Portal
New Member Guide
BLOGS
Pundits Blog
Congress Blog
Blog Briefing Room
NEWS
Leading The News
Business & Lobbying
K Street Insiders
John Breaux
John Engler
Vin Weber
Dave Wenhold
The Executive
Campaign 2008
Endorsements '08
COLUMNISTS
Dick Morris
A.B. Stoddard
Brent Budowsky
Ben Goddard
David Hill
David Keene
Josh Marshall
Mark Mellman
Jim Mills
Markos Moulitsas (Kos)
Byron York
COMMENT
Editorial
Letters
Op-eds
Weyant's World
CAPITAL LIVING
Today's Stories
50 Most Beautiful 2008
Other Features
In The Know
Bookshelf
Food & Drink
Onward and Upward
RESOURCES
Classifieds
Subscribe
Order Reprints
Last Six Issues
Useful Links
RSS


Home arrow Today's Stories arrow Seersucker fever on Capitol Hill
Today's Stories PDF Print E-mail
Seersucker fever on Capitol Hill
Posted: 07/26/06 12:00 AM [ET]

The seersucker suit generally elicits two reactions: one of admiration for those who wear such brightly striped attire, and another of wisdom for sporting cooler material in the scorching summer weather.

Last week, seersucker reached a feverish pitch as several lawmakers wore the characteristic blue-and-white-striped suit. Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.) was decked out in full seersucker regalia, as were Reps. Howard Coble (R-N.C.) and Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.).

Davis looked confident in his seersucker, as he should, considering he represents Virginia and the suit strikes a Southern image. For him, seersucker seems to be a perfect fit, depicting a man at a social gathering who has made the conscious decision to wear the cooler, summer fashion-worthy material.

Rep. Zach Wamp (R-Tenn.) won’t wear seersucker. He has tried it a few times, once to the Kentucky Derby, but has not taken to it.

“It’s like a bow tie,” he says. “I got a lot of compliments, but it didn’t feel good. Only worn ’em twice. Just a way to stay cool, just trying to beat the heat.”

Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho) doesn’t believe wearing seersucker is for him. “I’m pro-seersucker,” he says, “but I wouldn’t be caught dead in it.”

Simpson says he enjoys it when colleagues wear the material because “it makes the rest of us look good. If I was selling ice cream, I’d like it.”

Shockingly, seersucker is far too pricey to be worn selling ice cream. At Brooks Brothers, a seersucker suit can set you back $298. But at the discounted Syms, it was on sale last week for $85.

Across the aisle, the Senate reserves a special day for seersucker called “Seersucker Thursdays,” a declared day that lawmakers ought to wear the fabric. Sens. Trent Lott (R-Miss.), Thad Cochran (R-Miss.) and Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) are well-known seersucker aficionados.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who bought her suit at Brooks Brothers, wears the female version of a striped blazer and skirt.

A GOP aide familiar with “Seersucker Thursdays” says he isn’t comfortable wearing it, as he has lived a good deal of his life in the Northeast.

“They aren’t awful-looking,” he says, but adds, “You can’t wear it all the time, maybe once every 10 days.”

Which brings the Fashion Critic to a critical point: Use your seersucker in moderation — and put it deep in the closet after Labor Day.

 
 
 
BLOGS
ADVERTISER
Home | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions
The Hill
1625 K Street, NW Suite 900
Washington, DC 20006
202-628-8500 tel | 202-628-8503 fax

The contents of this site are © 2008 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.