THE HILL
 

Senate OKs defense bill, 68-29

By Roxana Tiron - 10/22/09 04:20 PM ET

The Senate on Thursday sent the massive 2010 Pentagon policy bill to the president's desk for signing. The Senate approved the bill authorizing $680 billion in defense spending by a vote of 68-29.

For the first time in a decade-long effort, the bill will include a provision that expands the federal hate-crimes law to cover offenses based on sexual orientation. The provision received a boost from the Democratic majority in Congress and has President Barack Obama’s backing. Democrats view the successful passage of hate-crimes legislation as a tribute to the late Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.), the champion of expanding the law.

The 2010 defense authorization bill also continues to fund an alternate engine for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. The Obama administration initially threatened to veto the bill if authorized funds for a second engine would seriously disrupt the overall F-35 program.

But Obama is not expected to veto the defense authorization bill. He won a big victory on it: The Senate voted to stop production of the F-22 fighter jet at 187 planes. The Senate vote had ripple effects through conference with the House authorizers and prompted defense appropriators to also scrap any plans for funding additional planes.

While Obama is not likely to veto the policy bill, he has yet to take a definitive stance over the 2010 defense appropriations bill. Senate and House appropriators are still negotiating the conference report and several lawmakers, including Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.), the House Appropriations Defense subcommittee chairman, have indicated that funding for an alternate engine is likely to be in the bill.

The $680 billion defense policy bill also authorizes $130 billion for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq for fiscal year 2010, which started Oct. 1. 

This story was updated at 5:20 p.m.


Source:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/64377-senate-to-vote-on-defense-bill

Comments (9)

This story says nothing about the threat to the Franken anti-rape amendment. Is it in jeopardy or not?BY tom lyons on 10/22/2009 at 17:10
this bill is wrong not because of a crime of hate, it should be a hate crime for all, women, children, the elderly, gay ,or disabled, this law singles out one for special treatment instead of justice is for all not just a select few justice is supposed to be blind equality for allBY wtobias on 10/22/2009 at 18:21
Makes no mention of the anti gay hate crimes billBY SuSaN_2009 on 10/22/2009 at 18:26
This is what is wrong with congress. What the heck does hate crime legislation have anything to do with defense? If hate crime legislation is that important, and I am not saying it is or is not, then let it stand on its own.BY Mark X on 10/22/2009 at 18:40
I don't claim to understand why the hate crimes legislation was attached to the defense bill, but the simple fact is over 60 senators had to vote for it in order for the amendment to even be attached in the first place so I see no problems here.BY Dameon on 10/22/2009 at 20:11
To WTOBIAS: The current law singles out one group as EXCLUDED from the protection from hate crimes that other groups, like the ones you mention, enjoy. This measure remedies that.BY Jonathan on 10/23/2009 at 15:55
This hate crimes bill is an attack on the church, nuff said.If a pastor on the pulpit preaches against the immoral lifestyle of homosexuality, from what I understand he can be charged with a hate crime.BY Mike on 10/24/2009 at 13:47
Mike - the bill only applies to violent actions. Anything that is said in a church or elsewhere is protected by the 1st Amendment.BY Sarah on 10/25/2009 at 04:41
Mike. As a church-going Christian I understand your concern. But as has already been pointed out this bill only applies to violence. There are people in my church who have been misinformed too and think this bill makes it illegal to say homosexuality is wrong. This is not the case. This bill was set in place so that harming or killing someone specifically because he or she is gay will now be treated with the same severity of committing such crimes on the basis of race, gender, etc… This is something I have found that once other Christians understand they agree with.BY Adam on 10/28/2009 at 16:02

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.